Optic neuritis and autoimmune optic neuropathies: advances in diagnosis and treatment
Open accessAbstract
Optic neuritis is an inflammatory optic neuropathy that is commonly indicative of autoimmune neurological disorders including multiple sclerosis, myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Early clinical recognition of optic neuritis is important in determining the potential aetiology, which has bearing on prognosis and treatment. Regaining high-contrast visual acuity is common in people with idiopathic optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis; however, residual deficits in contrast sensitivity, binocular vision, and motion perception might impair vision-specific quality-of-life metrics. In contrast, recovery of visual acuity can be poorer and optic nerve atrophy more severe in individuals who are seropositive for antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, AQP4, and CRMP5 than in individuals with typical optic neuritis from idiopathic or multiple-sclerosis associated optic neuritis. Key clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings differentiate these disorders, allowing clinicians to focus their diagnostic studies and optimise acute and preventive treatments. Guided by early and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis subtypes, the timely use of high-dose corticosteroids and, in some instances, plasmapheresis could prevent loss of high-contrast vision, improve contrast sensitivity, and preserve colour vision and visual fields. Advancements in our knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment of optic neuritis will ultimately improve our understanding of autoimmune neurological disorders, improve clinical trial design, and spearhead therapeutic innovation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Optic neuropathy can be caused by other inflammatory causes, such as MOGAD and NMOSD, as well as infectious, vascular, metabolic, nutritional, drug-induced, genetic and toxic causes.
“Optic neuropathy can be caused by other inflammatory causes, such as MOGAD and NMOSD, as well as infectious, vascular, metabolic, nutritional, drug-induced, genetic and toxic causes. 38,76,77”
From The use of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [76]
The paper’s opening summary identifies optic neuritis as an inflammatory optic neuropathy associated with MOGAD and NMOSD. The available passages do not substantiate the additional infectious, vascular, metabolic, nutritional, drug-induced, genetic, and toxic causes attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]1. Petzold A, Fraser C, Abegg M, et al. Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol (in press). Google Scholar
- [2]2. Thompson, AJ ∙ Banwell, BL ∙ Barkhof, F ∙ et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17:162-173 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (2833) PubMed Google Scholar
- [3]3. Newman, NJ ∙ Yu-Wai-Man, P ∙ Biousse, V ∙ et al. Understanding the molecular basis and pathogenesis of hereditary optic neuropathies: towards improved diagnosis and management Lancet Neurol. 2022; published online Sept 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00174-0 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Google Scholar · DOI · Paper page
- [4]4. Biousse, V ∙ Danesh-Meyer, H ∙ Saindane, A ∙ et al. Imaging of the optic nerve: technological advances and future prospects Lancet Neurol. 2022; published online Sept 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00173-9 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Google Scholar · DOI
- [5]5. Beck, RW ∙ Cleary, PA ∙ Anderson, Jr, MM ∙ et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis N Engl J Med. 1992; 326:581-588 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
- [6]6. Lennon, VA ∙ Wingerchuk, DM ∙ Kryzer, TJ ∙ et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis Lancet. 2004; 364:2106-2112 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (2539) PubMed Google Scholar
- [7]7. O'Connor, KC ∙ McLaughlin, KA ∙ De Jager, PL ∙ et al. Self-antigen tetramers discriminate between myelin autoantibodies to native or denatured protein Nat Med. 2007; 13:211-217 Crossref Scopus (284) PubMed Google Scholar
- [8]8. Hickman, SJ ∙ Petzold, A Update on optic neuritis: an international view Neuroophthalmology. 2021; 46:1-18 Crossref Scopus (2) PubMed Google Scholar
- [9]9. Hassan, MB ∙ Stern, C ∙ Flanagan, EP ∙ et al. Population-based incidence of optic neuritis in the era of aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; 220:110-114 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (20) PubMed Google Scholar
- [10]10. Beck, RW ∙ Cleary, PA ∙ Backlund, JC The course of visual recovery after optic neuritis. experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1771-1778
- Authors
- Bennett, J. L., Costello, F., Chen, J. J., Petzold, A., Biousse, V., Newman, N. J., & Galetta, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University College Hospital (GB)
- Emory University (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bennett, Jeffrey L
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296902573
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 162 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (P30-EY06360)
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
- National Institutes of Health (R01-EY022936, R01-NS115488, R21-032399)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Keywords
- optic neuritis, autoimmune optic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, aquaporin-4 antibodies, optic atrophy, visual acuity recovery, contrast sensitivity, corticosteroid therapy, plasmapheresis, treatment
- MeSH terms
- Autoantibodies, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, Optic Nerve Diseases, Optic Neuritis, Aquaporin 4, Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review