Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action

De Geest, Sabina, Sabaté, Eduardo·2003·European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a comprehensive report entitled Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action [1]. This report focuses on nine chronic conditions and their risk-factors. The conditions reviewed are hypertension, tobacco smoking cessation, asthma, cancer (palliative care), depression, diabetes, epilepsy, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. The report reviewed the available literature on the epidemiology of nonadherence worldwide; it stressed the multi-factorial nature of nonadherence, it identified health systems and health care teams as significant determinants to good adherence and discussed the health and economic consequences of nonadherence as well as some strategies for improving it. This report has major relevance for cardiovascular nurses. Cardiovascular disease is and will remain a major challenge for health care professionals and health care systems, and it contributes significantly to the global burden of disease in both developed and developing countries [2]. Nonadherence to treatment recommendations in patients with cardiovascular risk-factors as well as patients with cardiovascular disease is widespread, and it is a major factor contributing to poor outcome. Nurses are excellently positioned to target the behavioral dimension of chronic disease management. They can improve outcomes by developing and implementing adherence-enhancing strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk-factors, and to enhance adherence with non-smoking, diet, exercise and medication regimens [3]. The value of this WHO report is not only that it comprehensively reviews the current state of the literature including hypertension and tobacco smoking cessation, but also it highlights the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to adherence, emphasizes system factors that need to be addressed in successfully implementing adherence-enhancing strategies. Moreover, it also provides illustrative examples of the ways in which professionals have contributed in their own fields of expertise including cardiovascular care among other fields. This report, therefore, provides an instrument to cardiovascular nurses to expand the behavioral dimension of their patient management strategies, to teach students at undergraduate and graduate level, to guide their research endeavors, to guide policy makers, ultimately with the goal to improve outcomes of populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sabaté E., 2003, Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action

Cited by

See all 6,272

Metadata

Authors
De Geest, S., & Sabaté, E.
Venue
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2003-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
323-323
ISSN
  • 1474-5151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1953
OpenAlex
W1845225129
Cited by
6,272
References
1
FWCI
49.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4
The paper
De Geest, S., & Sabaté, E. (2003). Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.