The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research
Abstract
Organizational performance is widely recognized as an important – if not the most important – construct in strategic management research. Researchers also agree that organizational performance is a multidimensional construct. However, the research implications of the construct's multidimensionality are less understood. In this chapter, we use a synthesis of previous attempts to describe the dimensions of performance and our own analysis of performance measurement in the Strategic Management Journal to build a conceptual model of organizational performance and its dimensions. Our model suggests that operational performance and organizational performance are distinct, and that organizational performance can be further dimensionalized into accounting returns, stock market, and growth measures. The model has implications for how future research might advance understanding about performance and how empirical studies should conceptualize and measure performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“The value of triangulation has been widely accepted in the organization sciences (Jick, 1979).”
BackgroundOrganizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x · Cited by 3,550
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Cited by
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x · Cited by 3,550
COMBS, J., LIU, Y., HALL, A., & KETCHEN, D. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x · Cited by 2,092
Self-citationUnderstanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results
Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428110392383 · Cited by 642
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance
Santos, J. B., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012) · BAR - Brazilian Administration Review · doi:10.1590/s1807-76922012000500007 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L.
- Venue
- Research Methodology in Strategy and Management
- Publisher
- Emerald (MCB UP )
- Published
- 2005-12-17
- Pages
- 259-286
- ISSN
- 1479-8387 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1565051685
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1479-8387(05)02011-4
- The paper
- Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L. (2005). The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-8387(05)02011-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
