A LIGHT IN THE FOG: CARING FOR WOMEN WITH POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION
Abstract
It is estimated that at least 1 in 10 women will experience postpartum depression, yet systematic screening for it in clinical practice is too often neglected. The foggy unreality of this affective disorder leads women to believe they are losing their minds, and their efforts to find help can be elusive. Women with postpartum depression who go undetected and untreated are at risk for immediate harm and potential lifelong sequelae for themselves and their families, and especially for their children. This article provides 1) an understanding of the woman's experience of postpartum depression, 2) a review of two instruments, developed through a focused program of research to screen for the disorder, 3) triage in clinical practice, and 4) an overview of the three dimensions of treatment: psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial care. Practical guidance and client information are provided to assist midwives and primary care providers to incorporate systematic screening into clinical practice, to identify effective interdisciplinary treatment teams, and to muster family and community resources to help with this commonly hidden childbearing crisis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many cases of postnatal depression go undetected and untreated.
“Postnatal depression affects approximately 13 % of mothers and 9 % of co-parents, with many cases going undetected and untreated, posing significant risks to women, their families, and especially their children [12 -14].”
Postnatal depression affects approximately 13% of mothers and 9% of co-parents.
“Postnatal depression affects approximately 13 % of mothers and 9 % of co-parents, with many cases going undetected and untreated, posing significant risks to women, their families, and especially their children [12 -14].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Kennedy, H. P., Beck, C. T., & Driscoll, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kennedy, Holly Powell
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 318-330
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2164766777
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, screening, midwives, primary care providers, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, psychosocial care, triage, family support, maternal mental health, childbearing
- MeSH terms
- Child, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Mothers, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Assessment, Postnatal Care, Primary Health Care, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Women's Health, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Depression, Postpartum, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review