Adopting Real-Time Surveillance Dashboards as a Component of an Enterprisewide Medication Safety Strategy
Abstract
Background High-alert medications are frequently responsible for adverse drug events and present significant hazards to inpatients, despite technical improvements in the way they are ordered, dispensed, and administered. Methods A real-time surveillance application was designed and implemented to enable pharmacy review of high-alert medication orders to complement existing computerized provider order entry and integrated clinical decision support systems in a tertiary care hospital. The surveillance tool integrated real-time data from multiple clinical systems and applied logical criteria to highlight potentially high-risk scenarios. Use of the surveillance system for adult inpatients was analyzed for warfarin, heparin and enoxaparin, and aminoglycoside antibiotics. Results Among 28,929 hospitalizations during the study period, patients eligible to appear on a dashboard included 2224 exposed to warfarin, 8383 to heparin or enoxaparin, and 893 to aminoglycosides. Clinical pharmacists reviewed the warfarin and aminoglycoside dashboards during 100% of the days in the study period-and the heparinlenoxaparin dashboard during 71% of the days. Displayed alert conditions ranged from common events, such as 55% of patients receiving aminoglycosides were missing a baseline creatinine, to rare events, such as 0.1% of patients exposed to heparin were given a bolus greater than 10,000 units. On the basis of interpharmacist communication and electronic medical record notes recorded within t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutions have implemented various dashboards that organize and present information from the EHR in a way that is easy to interpret.
“Similarly, to facilitate alert evaluations, institutions have implemented various dashboards that organize and present information from the EHR in a way that is easy to interpret.29–34”
From Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Wysowski, D. K., & Swartz, L. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.12.1363 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative
McCoy, A. B., Russo, E. M., Johnson, K. B., Addison, B., Patel, N., Wanderer, J. P., Mize, D. E., Jackson, J. G., Reese, T. J., Littlejohn, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac027 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationRamesh, S. H., Ouskine, A., Khorasani, E., Ebrahimipour, M., Finestone, H., Chan, A. D. C., & Rajabiyazdi, F. (2024) · Graphics Interface · doi:10.1145/3670947.3670978 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waitman, L. R., Phillips, I. E., McCoy, A. B., Danciu, I., Halpenny, R. M., Nelsen, C. L., Johnson, D. C., Starmer, J. M., & Peterson, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Waitman, Lemuel R.
- Venue
- The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 326-AP4
- ISSN
- 1553-7250 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W131357257
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Keywords
- high-risk medications, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, warfarin, heparin, enoxaparin, aminoglycosides, computerized physician order entry, clinical decision support, pharmacist review, medication errors, inpatient medication safety
- MeSH terms
- Aminoglycosides, Anticoagulants, Communication, Humans, Medication Errors, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Safety Management, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review