Tissue-dependent effects of immunization with a nicotine conjugate vaccine on the distribution of nicotine in rats
Abstract
Vaccination of rats against nicotine reduces nicotine distribution to brain even at nicotine doses greatly exceeding the estimated binding capacity of the available antibody. This observation suggests a differential effect by which vaccination reduces nicotine distribution to brain to a greater extent than to other tissues. To test this hypothesis, vaccinated rats received a single intravenous nicotine dose equal to twice the estimated binding capacity of nicotine-specific antibody in vaccinated rats. The total and bound serum nicotine concentrations were higher in the vaccinated rats compared to controls, while the unbound serum nicotine concentration was lower. Distribution of nicotine to brain was reduced in vaccinated rats in a time-dependent manner, with a greater reduction at 1 min (64%) than at 25 min (45%). Vaccination reduced nicotine distribution to muscle, testis, spleen, liver, heart, and kidney, but to a lesser extent than to brain, while nicotine distribution to fat was increased. Chronically infused nicotine showed a similarly altered pattern of tissue distribution in vaccinated rats, but differences were in general smaller than after a single nicotine dose; brain nicotine concentration was 24% lower in vaccinated rats, while lung nicotine concentration was higher. The presence of nicotine-specific antibody in tissues may have contributed to the increased nicotine concentrations in fat and lung. These data suggest that vaccination reduces nicotine distribution to brain not only by sequestering nicotine in serum but also by redirecting tissue distribution disproportionately away from brain, such that nicotine concentrations are reduced to a greater extent in brain than in other tissues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nicotine vaccine reduces the early distribution of nicotine to the brain in rats by up to 65% in clinically relevant acute and chronic nicotine doses.
“Study results have shown that the nicotine vaccine reduces the early distribution of nicotine to the brain in rats, by up to 65%, in clinically relevant acute and chronic nicotine doses (132).”
From Tobacco addiction (2008) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Satoskar, S. D., Keyler, D. E., LeSage, M. G., Raphael, D. E., Ross, C. A., & Pentel, P. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Satoskar, S.D
- Venue
- International Immunopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 957-970
- ISSN
- 1567-5769 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054127699
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Immunopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1u19da013327-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U19 DA13327, R01DA010714, DA10714)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- nicotine vaccine, tissue distribution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Brain, Immunization, Male, Nicotine, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Vaccines, Conjugate, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review