CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 357Marine Toxins and Detection MethodsMarine Plankton and BiogeochemistryAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monitoring Karenia brevis blooms in the Gulf of Mexico using satellite ocean color imagery and other data.

Stumpf, R.P., Culver, M.E., Tester, P.A., Tomlinson, M., Kirkpatrick, G.J., Pederson, B.A., Truby, E., Ransibrahmanakul, V., Soracco, M.·2003·Harmful Algae
DOI 10.1016/s1568-9883(02)00083-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1568-9883(02)00083-5

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Cannizzaro, J.P., Carder, K.L., Chen, F.R., Walsh, J.J., Lee, Z.P., Heil, C., Villareal, T., 2002. A novel optical classification technique for detection of red tides in the Gulf of Mexico: application to the 2001–2002 bloom event. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Harmful Algae, St. Pete Beach, Florida, 21–25 October 2002. p. 43.
  2. Culver, M.E., Soracco, M., Stumpf, R.P., Change, P.S., Steidinger, K.A., 2000. Integrating wind data to determine the influence on movement of a harmful algal bloom event along the northwest coast of Florida. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments. Veridian ERIM Intl., Ann Arbor, MI, USA, pp. 25–27.
  3. Dortch, Q., Moncreiff, C.A., Mendenhall, W., Parsons, M.L., Franks, J.S., Hemphill, K.W., 1998. Spread of Gymnodinium breve into the northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernandez, M.L., Wyatt, T. (Eds.), Harmful Algae. Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, pp. 143–144.
  4. Haddad, K.D., 1982. Hydrographic Factors Associated with West Florida Toxic Red Tide Blooms: An Assessment for Satellite Prediction and Monitoring, M.Sc. Thesis. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL.
  5. Heil, C.A., 1986. Vertical Migration of Ptychodiscus brevis (Davis) Steidinger, M.Sc. Thesis. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, 118 pp.
  6. Mueller, J.L., 1979. Prospects for measuring phytoplankton bloom extent and patchiness using remotely sensed ocean color images: an example. In: Taylor, D.L., Seliger, H.H. (Eds.), Toxic Dinoflagellate Blooms. Elsevier, New York, pp. 303–308.
  7. Stumpf, R.P., Ransibrahmanakul, V., Steidinger, K.A., et al. 1998. Observations of sea surface temperature and winds in association with Florida, USA red tides (Gymnodinium breve blooms). In: Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernandez, M.L., Wyatt, T. (Eds.), Harmful Algae. Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Paris, France, pp. 145–148.
  8. Stumpf, R.P., Arnone, R.A., Gould, R.W., Martinolich, P., Ransibrahmanakul, V., Tester, P.A., Steward, R.G., Subramaniam, A., Culver, M.E., Pennock, J.R., 2000. SeaWiFS ocean color data for US Southeast coastal waters. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments. Veridian ERIM Intl., Ann Arbor, MI, USA, pp. 25–27.
  9. Tester, 1998, Phytoplankton blooms and remote sensing: what is the potential for early warning, J. Shellfish Res., 17, 1469
  10. Tester, P.A., Stumpf, R.P., Steidinger, K.A., 1998. Ocean color imagery: what is the minimum detection level for Gymnodinium breve blooms? In: Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernandez, M.L., Wyatt, T. (Eds.), Harmful Algae. Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Paris, France, pp. 149–151.
  11. Thomas, D.G., 2000. The Use of SeaWiFS-Derived Bio-Optical Properties to Characterize Harmful Algal Blooms, M.Sc. Thesis. University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 357

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stumpf, R. P., Culver, M. E., Tester, P. A., Tomlinson, M., Kirkpatrick, G. J., Pederson, B. A., Truby, E., Ransibrahmanakul, V., & Soracco, M.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Mote Marine Laboratory (US)
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US)
Corresponding author
Stumpf, R.P.
ORCID
Venue
Harmful Algae
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
147-160
ISSN
1568-9883 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1568-9883(02)00083-5
OpenAlex
W1977142525
Cited by
357
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Harmful Algae (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Karenia brevis, harmful algal blooms, bloom monitoring, bloom prediction, ocean color remote sensing, SeaWiFS, bloom detection, wind data, shellfish management, public health advisories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review