Cited by 102

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of pentacyclic triterpenic acids from frankincense gum resins and related phytopharmaceuticals by high-performance liquid chromatography. Identification of lupeolic acid, a novel pentacyclic triterpene

Büchele, Berthold, Zugmaier, Waltraud, Simmet, Thomas·2003·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

An HPLC gradient method with photodiode array detection was developed for the simultaneous analysis of 12 different pentacyclic triterpenic acids in Indian and African frankincense gum resins as well as in related phytopharmaceuticals. The triterpenic acids were obtained by an exhaustive extraction procedure. Identification of the compounds was based on retention times, UV-spectra and add on technique with standards isolated from African frankincense. The method allows differentiation of frankincense of different origin and standardization of frankincense-based phytopharmaceuticals. Further, this is the first report identifying a novel pentacyclic triterpene, lupeolic acid, as a constituent of frankincense gum resins.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00160-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Koch, 1998, Bioforum, 6, 352
  2. Winterstein, 1932, Z. Physiol. Chem., 208, 9, 10.1515/bchm2.1932.208.1-3.9 · DOI
  3. Pardy, 1978, Indian J. Chem., 16B, 176
  4. Fattorusso, 1983, Phytochemistry, 22, 2868, 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97720-3 · DOI
  5. Krohn, 2001, Phytochem. Anal., 12, 374, 10.1002/pca.606 · DOI
  6. Sander, 1998, Z. Rheumatol., 57, 11, 10.1007/s003930050051 · DOI
  7. Gupta, 1998, Eur. J. Med. Res., 3, 511
  8. Janßen, 2000, Klin. Pädiatr., 212, 189, 10.1055/s-2000-9676 · DOI
  9. Streffer, 2001, Neurology, 56, 1219, 10.1212/WNL.56.9.1219 · DOI
  10. Gerhardt, 2001, Z. Gasteroenterol., 39, 11, 10.1055/s-2001-10708 · DOI
  11. Safayhi, 1997, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 281, 460
  12. Safayhi, 1992, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 261, 1143
  13. Syrovets, 2000, Mol. Pharmacol., 58, 71, 10.1124/mol.58.1.71 · DOI
  14. Hoernlein, 1998, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 288, 613
  15. Belsner, 2003, Magn. Res. Chem., 41, 115, 10.1002/mrc.1138 · DOI
  16. Sacher, 2001, J. Chromatogr. A, 938, 199, 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01266-3 · DOI
  17. Ganzera, 2001, Planta Med., 67, 778, 10.1055/s-2001-18346 · DOI
  18. Tawab, 2001, J. Chromatogr. B, 761, 221, 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00335-8 · DOI
  19. Schweizer, 2000, J. Nat. Prod., 63, 1058, 10.1021/np000069k · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Büchele, B., Zugmaier, W., & Simmet, T.
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
791
Issue
1-2
Pages
21-30
ISSN
1570-0232
Cited by
102
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review