The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Self-citationEstimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2971733 · Cited by 5,486
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 · Cited by 4,230
Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects
Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951620 · Cited by 4,101
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Cited by
McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkt007 · Cited by 659
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258717727718 · Cited by 555
Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks?: Evidence from Chechnya
Lyall, J. (2009) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002708330881 · Cited by 499
When Should We Use Unit Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
Imai, K., & Kim, I. S. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12417 · Cited by 369
Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact
Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319900539 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M.
- Venue
- Handbook of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 3895-3962
- ISSN
- 1573-4471 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1594558933
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1573-4471(07)04061-2
- The paper
- Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Chapter 61 Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. Handbook of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4471(07)04061-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
