Cited by 75Income, Poverty, and InequalitySocial Policy and Reform StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Chapter 6 Income poverty in advanced countries

Jäntti, Markus, Danziger, Sheldon·2000·Handbook of Income Distribution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1574-0056(00)80009-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jäntti, M., & Danziger, S.
Affiliations
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Handbook of Income Distribution
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2000
Pages
309-378
ISSN
1574-0056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1516756564
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbook of income distribution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
income poverty, poverty measurement, poverty line, household income, Luxembourg Income Study, transfer payments, taxes and transfers, poverty mobility, intergenerational mobility, intragenerational mobility, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review