Cited by 16Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasSex and Gender in HealthcareAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Gender-based differences in cardiac disease

Open access
Yang, Pei-Chi, Clancy, Colleen E.·2011·Journal of Biomedical Research

Abstract

It has been observed that the incidence of heart failure and Brugada syndrome are higher in men, while women are more likely to have QT interval prolongation and develop torsades de pointes (TdP). Over the past decade, new studies have improved our understanding of the mechanisms of abnormal repolarization and the relationship between gender differences in cardiac repolarization and presentation of clinical syndromes. Nevertheless, the causes of gender-based differences in cardiac disease are still not completely clear. This review paper briefly summarized what is currently known about gender differences in heart failure, Brugada syndrome and long QT syndrome from molecular mechanisms to clinical presentations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1674-8301(11)60010-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women are known to have on average smaller hearts and have differences in electrophysiology, and this relationship between heart size and tissue properties may not be explicitly represented in a model.

    “For example, women are known to have on average smaller hearts and have differences in electrophysiology [69, 70], and this relationship between heart size and tissue properties may not be explicitly represented in a model.”

    From Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices (2024) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes intrinsic electrical differences between women and men, including differences in ion-channel expression. Our copy does not establish that women have smaller hearts on average. The statement about what a model may omit follows the citation and reads as the citing authors’ own observation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 16

Authors
Yang, P.-C., & Clancy, C. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Pei-Chi
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
81-89
ISSN
1674-8301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980863653
Cited by
16
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
sex differences, heart failure, Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, cardiac repolarization, molecular mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review