Cited by 22Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in East and Southern Africa

Open access
Scott, Heather, Dairo, Akinyele·2015·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract

Maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) is one of several low cost, high impact strategies to reduce maternal mortality. This initiative is supported in eastern and southern Africa by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and other partners. Currently, South Africa is the leading country in the institutionalization of MDSR through the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths (CEMD). With the support of UNFPA and other partners, at least 15 countries in the region have introduced MDSR into maternal and newborn health care programs. The report from the knowledge-sharing meeting and the findings of the evaluation of the South African MDSR show that MDSR is still not at an optimal level in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa, despite the efforts of national authorities and support from a number of development partners. Additional work is required on the part of national authorities, communities, and development organizations, and the challenges being faced were highlighted at the knowledge-sharing meeting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30030-5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Scott H. Evaluation of the processes of the South African National Committee on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths. 2014 (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Scott, H., & Dairo, A.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • United Nations Population Fund (US)
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
915-921
ISSN
1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178748590
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal death surveillance and response, maternal mortality, confidential enquiry into maternal deaths, South Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, UNFPA, knowledge sharing
MeSH terms
Africa, Eastern, Africa, Southern, Female, Humans, Population Surveillance, Maternal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review