RETIRED: Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Abstract
This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Canada, the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus changed from 3.8 to 6.5% (SOGC) or 2.0-4.0% (DA) in 1992 to 7.0% using the two-step method or 16.1% using the one-step method.
“Analyzing the data, the incidence of GDM changed from 3.8 to 6.5% (SOGC) or 2.0–4.0% (DA) in 1992 to 7.0% using the two-step method or to 16.1% using the one-step method.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes
Carpenter, M. W., & Coustan, D. R. (1982) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
Metzger, B. E. (1991) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.40.2.s197 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Garner, P., Okun, N., Keely, E., Wells, G., Perkins, S., Sylvain, J., & Belcher, J. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70461-7 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Jang, H. C., Cho, N. H., Min, Y.-K., Han, I. K., Jung, K. B., & Metzger, B. E. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.10.1582 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RETIRED: Diabetes in Pregnancy
Berger, H., Gagnon, R., & Sermer, M. (2016) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.002 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berger, H., Crane, J., Farine, D., Armson, A. B., de la Ronde, S., Keenan-Lindsay, L., Leduc, L., Reid, G., & Aerde, J. V.
- ORCID
- John Van Aerde
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 894-903
- ISSN
- 1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4302401733
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM screening, glucose challenge test, oral glucose tolerance test, diagnostic criteria, WHO criteria, maternal and fetal outcomes, risk factor-based screening, universal screening, maternal age, body mass index, family history of diabetes, low-risk pregnancy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review