Qualitative research in nursing and health professions regulation
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Qualitative research has been identified by scholars as being critical to generating rich data on the development and implementation of regulatory policies and practices, and for understanding the perspectives of diverse system partners.
“Qualitative research has been identified by scholars as being critical to generating rich data on the development and implementation of regulatory policies and practices, and for understanding the perspectives of diverse system partners [218].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [218]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 108
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Nelson, L. K., Burk, D., Knudsen, M., & McCall, L. (2018). The Future of Coding. Sociological Methods & Research. Advance online publica- tion. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769114 · DOI
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research & applications (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Authors
- Squires, A., & Dorsen, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Regulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 2155-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895548890
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-07-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Regulation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- qualitative research methodology, nursing regulation, health professions regulation, stakeholder perspectives, sampling strategy, data collection challenges, research trustworthiness, regulatory design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
