Cited by 211Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Long-term safety and efficacy of ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis who have the Gly551Asp-CFTR mutation: a phase 3, open-label extension study (PERSIST)

McKone, Edward F, Borowitz, Drucy, Drevinek, Pavel, Griese, Matthias, Konstan, Michael W, Wainwright, Claire, Ratjen, Felix, Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle +5 more·2014·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Ivacaftor, a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) potentiator, is approved for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older with Gly551Asp-CFTR. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ivacaftor during 96 weeks of PERSIST in patients with cystic fibrosis who completed a previous 48-week, placebo-controlled trial of the drug (STRIVE or ENVISION). Methods In this phase 3, open-label extension study, patients received ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h in addition to their prescribed cystic fibrosis therapies. Patients who received placebo in their previous study initiated ivacaftor in this extension study. Patients were eligible if they had a Gly551Asp-CFTR mutation on at least one allele. The primary objective was to assess the long-term safety profile of ivacaftor as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and physical examination; secondary measures included change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), weight, and pulmonary exacerbations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01117012 and EudraCT, number 2009-012997-11. Findings Between July 8, 2010, and April 8, 2013, 144 adolescents/adults (≥12 years) from STRIVE and 48 children (6-11 years) from ENVISION were enrolled. Across both trials, 38 (20%) patients had a serious adverse event during the first 48 weeks and 44 (23%) during the subsequent 48 weeks. Two adults (1%) and one child (<1%) discontinued because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were pulmonary exacerbation, cough, and upper respiratory tract infection. Patients previously treated with ivacaftor had sustained improvements in FEV1, weight, and rate of pulmonary exacerbations for up to 144 weeks of treatment. Among adolescents/adults and children who previously received ivacaftor, absolute change in FEV1 at week 96 (144 weeks ivacaftor) was 9·4 and 10·3 % points and absolute increase in weight was 4·1 kg and 14·8 kg, respectively. For adolescents/adults only, the pulmonary exacerbation rate remained suppressed compared with that of patients who received placebo in the placebo-controlled study. Interpretation At 144 weeks of treatment, ivacaftor was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns. Ivacaftor also provided durable effects for 144 weeks in patients who had received active treatment in the placebo-controlled study. Those patients who previously received placebo had improvements comparable to those of patients treated with ivacaftor in the placebo-controlled study. Funding Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70218-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKone, E. F., Borowitz, D., Drevinek, P., Griese, M., Konstan, M. W., Wainwright, C., Ratjen, F., Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Plant, B., Munck, A., Jiang, Y., Gilmartin, G., & Davies, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • München Klinik (DE)
  • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
McKone, Edward F
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
902-910
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162070501
Cited by
211
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 3
FWCI
19.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
ivacaftor, cystic fibrosis, CFTR potentiators, long-term safety, FEV1, pulmonary exacerbations, weight gain, adverse events, children and adolescents, EnVision, CFTR modulator therapy, lung function decline, respiratory syncytial virus infection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aminophenols, Child, Cough, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Mutation, Respiratory Tract Infections, Time Factors, Quinolones, Weight Gain, Disease Progression, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review