Cited by 170Obesity and Health PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The importance of language in engagement between health-care professionals and people living with obesity: a joint consensus statement

Open access
Albury, Charlotte, Strain, W David, Brocq, Sarah Le, Logue, Jennifer, Lloyd, Cathy, Tahrani, Abd·2020·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Obesity is a chronic condition that requires long-term management and is associated with unprecedented stigma in different settings, including during interactions with the health-care system. This stigma has a negative effect on the mental and physical health of people with obesity and can lead to avoidance of health care and disruption of the doctor-patient relationship. Considerable evidence exists to suggest that simply having a conversation about obesity can lead to weight loss, which translates into health benefits. However, both health-care practitioners and people living with obesity report apprehension in initiating this conversation. We have collaborated with stakeholders from Obesity UK, physicians, dieticians, clinical psychologists, obesity researchers, conversation analysts, nurses, and representatives from National Health Service England Diabetes and Obesity. This group has contributed to the production of this consensus statement, which addresses how people living with obesity wish to have their condition referred to and provides practical guidance for health-care professionals to facilitate collaborative and supportive discussions about obesity. Expert stakeholders consider that changes to language used at the point of care can alleviate the stigma of obesity within the health-care system and support improved outcomes for both people living with obesity and for the health-care system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30102-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 170

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Puhl R, Suh Y. Health Consequences of Weight Stigma: Implications for Obesity Prevention and Treatment. Curr Obes Rep 2015; 4(2): 182-90.
  2. Butland B, Jebb SA, Kopelman P, et al. Foresight 'Tackling Obesities: Future Choices' project 2nd edition. Gouvernment Office for Science 2007.
  3. Lupton D. Fat. London: Routledge; 2013.
  4. Warr W, Albury C, Tudor K, Aveyard P, Ziebland S. What is known about the beliefs, feelings and cultural norms of staff in primary care in discussing weight? A systematic review of qualitative studies. forthcoming.

Authors
Albury, C., Strain, W. D., Brocq, S. L., Logue, J., Lloyd, C., & Tahrani, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Strain, W David
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
447-455
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017996987
Cited by
170
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 8
FWCI
36.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester
  • NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, weight stigma, physician-patient relationship, healthcare workers, patient engagement
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Language, Obesity, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Consensus, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review