The importance of language in engagement between health-care professionals and people living with obesity: a joint consensus statement
Open accessAbstract
Obesity is a chronic condition that requires long-term management and is associated with unprecedented stigma in different settings, including during interactions with the health-care system. This stigma has a negative effect on the mental and physical health of people with obesity and can lead to avoidance of health care and disruption of the doctor-patient relationship. Considerable evidence exists to suggest that simply having a conversation about obesity can lead to weight loss, which translates into health benefits. However, both health-care practitioners and people living with obesity report apprehension in initiating this conversation. We have collaborated with stakeholders from Obesity UK, physicians, dieticians, clinical psychologists, obesity researchers, conversation analysts, nurses, and representatives from National Health Service England Diabetes and Obesity. This group has contributed to the production of this consensus statement, which addresses how people living with obesity wish to have their condition referred to and provides practical guidance for health-care professionals to facilitate collaborative and supportive discussions about obesity. Expert stakeholders consider that changes to language used at the point of care can alleviate the stigma of obesity within the health-care system and support improved outcomes for both people living with obesity and for the health-care system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The power of language in medical discourse is widely discussed.
“The power of language in medical discourse is widely discussed.41,42”
From Dementia prevention and the GP’s role: a qualitative interview study (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 170
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Puhl R, Suh Y. Health Consequences of Weight Stigma: Implications for Obesity Prevention and Treatment. Curr Obes Rep 2015; 4(2): 182-90.
- Butland B, Jebb SA, Kopelman P, et al. Foresight 'Tackling Obesities: Future Choices' project 2nd edition. Gouvernment Office for Science 2007.
- Lupton D. Fat. London: Routledge; 2013.
- Warr W, Albury C, Tudor K, Aveyard P, Ziebland S. What is known about the beliefs, feelings and cultural norms of staff in primary care in discussing weight? A systematic review of qualitative studies. forthcoming.
- Authors
- Albury, C., Strain, W. D., Brocq, S. L., Logue, J., Lloyd, C., & Tahrani, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- The Open University (GB)
- National Health Service (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Strain, W David
- Venue
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 447-455
- ISSN
- 2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3017996987
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 36.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- obesity, weight stigma, physician-patient relationship, healthcare workers, patient engagement
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Language, Obesity, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Consensus, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review