Erectile function in men with type 2 diabetes treated with dulaglutide: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND placebo-controlled randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Diabetes is a major risk factor for erectile dysfunction, however, the effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on erectile dysfunction is unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence, prevalence, and progression of erectile dysfunction in men treated with dulaglutide compared with placebo, and to determine whether dulaglutide's effect on erectile dysfunction was consistent with its effect on other diabetes-related outcomes.Methods The Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of the effect of dulaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes. REWIND was done at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women aged older than 50 years with type 2 diabetes, who had either a previous cardiovascular event or cardiovascular risk factors, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either dulaglutide or placebo. Participating men were offered the opportunity to complete the standardised International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire at baseline, 2 years, 5 years, and study end. We did an exploratory analysis, in which we included participants who completed a baseline and at least 1 follow-up IIEF questionnaire. The primary outcome for these analyses was the first occurrence of moderate or severe erectile dysfunction following randomisation, assessed by the erectile function subscores on IIEF. This analysis was part of the REWIND trial, which is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01394952.Findings Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, 3725 (70·1%) of 5312 male participants with a mean age of 65·5 years (SD 6·4 years) were analysed, of whom 1487 (39·9%) had a history of cardiovascular disease, and 2104 (56·5%) had moderate or severe erectile dysfunction at baseline. The incidence of erectile dysfunction following randomisation was 21·3 per 100 person-years in the dulaglutide group and 22·0 per 100 person-years in the placebo group (HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·85-0·99, p=0·021). Men in the dulaglutide group also had a lesser fall in erectile function subscore compared with the placebo group, with a least square mean difference of 0·61 (95% CI 0·18-1·05, p=0·006).Interpretation Long-term use of dulaglutide might reduce the incidence of moderate or severe erectile dysfunction in men with type 2 diabetes.Funding Eli Lilly and Company.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The largest study in humans is an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial, which showed that dulaglutide was associated with a small yet significant reduction in ED risk (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.021) in 3725 patients with T2D and class I obesity.
“The largest study in humans is an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial, evaluating the effect of dulaglutide vs. placebo on CV outcomes, which showed that dulaglutide was associated with a small yet significant reduction in ED risk (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85–0.99, p = 0.021) in 3725 patients with T2D and class I obesity.”
From Incretin-based therapies for the treatment of obesity-related diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Bajaj, H. S., Gerstein, H. C., Rao-Melacini, P., Basile, J., Colhoun, H., Conget, I., Cushman, W. C., Dagenais, G. R., Franek, E., Hanefeld, M., Keltai, M., Lakshmanan, M., Lanas, F., Leiter, L. A., Lopez-Jaramillo, P., Pirags, V., Pogosova, N., Probstfield, J., Raubenheimer, P., Ryden, L., Shaw, J. E., Sheu, W. H.-H., & Xavier, D.
- Affiliations
- LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada) (CA)
- McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
- Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Gerstein, Hertzel C
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 484-490
- ISSN
- 2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3176374233
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-08-01)
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- Repositorio Universidad de Santander (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Keywords
- erectile dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, dulaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, REWIND trial, International Index of Erectile Function, cardiovascular disease
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review