Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study
Abstract
Background The risk of type 2 diabetes among women with glucose intolerance during pregnancy that does not meet gestational diabetes criteria requires further investigation. We aimed to explore the associations between various degrees of gestational glucose intolerance and the risk of type 2 diabetes in young adulthood. Methods For this population-based cohort study, the national Israeli conscription database was linked to Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), the second-largest state-mandated health provider in Israel. We included 177 241 women who underwent a pre-recruitment evaluation at adolescence (age 16-20 years), 1 year before mandatory military service, and later underwent, from Jan 1, 2001, to Dec 31, 2019, two-step gestational diabetes screening with a 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) based on a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7·8 mmol/L), followed as needed by a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Abnormal OGTT values were defined according to the Carpenter-Coustan thresholds: 95 mg/dL (5·3 mmol/L) or higher in the fasting state; 180 mg/dL (10·0 mmol/L) or higher at 1 h; 155 mg/dL (8·6 mmol/L) or higher at 2 h; and 140 mg/dL (7·8 mmol/L) or higher at 3 h. The primary outcome was incident type 2 diabetes in the MHS diabetes registry. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for incident type 2 diabetes. Findings During a cumulative follow-up of 1 882 647 person-years, and with a median follow-up of 10·8 (IQR 5·2-16·4) years, 1262 women were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Crude incidence rates of type 2 diabetes were 2·6 (95% CI 2·4-2·9) per 10 000 person-years in women with gestational normoglycaemia, 8·9 (7·4-10·6) per 10 000 person-years in women with an abnormal GCT and normal OGTT, 26·1 (22·4-30·1) per 10 000 person-years in women with one abnormal OGTT value (in the fasting state or 1 h, 2 h, or 3 h post-challenge), and 71·9 (66·0-78·3) per 10 000 person-years in women with gestational diabetes. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, adolescent BMI, and age at gestational screening, the risk of type 2 diabetes was higher, compared to the gestational normoglycaemia group, in women with an abnormal GCT and normal OGTT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3·39 [95% CI 2·77-4·16]; p<0·0001), in women with one abnormal OGTT value (9·11 [7·64-10·86]; p<0·0001), and in women with gestational diabetes (24·84 [21·78-28·34]; p<0·0001). The risk of type 2 diabetes was modestly increased in women with isolated elevated fasting glucose (adjusted HR 11·81 [95% CI 8·58-16·25]; p<0·0001), and in women with gestational diabetes and an abnormal fasting glucose (38·02 [32·41-44·61]; p<0·0001). Interpretation Gestational glucose intolerance, including conditions not meeting gestational diabetes criteria of the two-step strategy, confers a high risk of type 2 diabetes in young adulthood. These conditions should be recognised as risk factors for type 2 diabetes, especially among women with abnormal fasting glucose concentrations during pregnancy. Funding None.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with gestational diabetes mellitus have increased risk of future type 2 diabetes, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease.
“Women with gestational diabetes mellitus have increased risk of future type 2 diabetes, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Bardugo, A., Bendor, C. D., Rotem, R. S., Tsur, A. M., Derazne, E., Gerstein, H. C., Tzur, D., Pinhas-Hamiel, O., Cukierman-Yaffe, T., Raz, I., Hod, M., Tirosh, A., Lebenthal, Y., Afek, A., Chodick, G., & Twig, G.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Harvard University (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Twig, Gilad
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 333-344
- ISSN
- 2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4362517382
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- glucose intolerance in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, early-onset type 2 diabetes, type 2 diabetes risk, oral glucose tolerance test, glucose challenge test, hyperglycemia in pregnancy, young adult women, conscription, diabetes incidence, Carpenter and Coustan criteria, gestational weight gain, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes screening
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose, Humans, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Glucose Intolerance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review