Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 900

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study

Open access
Hogan, Alexandra B, Jewell, Britta L, Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Vesga, Juan F, Watson, Oliver J, Whittaker, Charles, Hamlet, Arran, Smith, Jennifer A, Winskill, Peter, Verity, Robert, Baguelin, Marc, Lees, John A, Whittles, Lilith K, Ainslie, Kylie E C, Bhatt, Samir, Boonyasiri, Adhiratha, Brazeau, Nicholas F, Cattarino, Lorenzo, Cooper, Laura V, Coupland, Helen, Cuomo-Dannenburg, Gina, Dighe, Amy, Djaafara, Bimandra A, Donnelly, Christl A, Eaton, Jeff W, van Elsland, Sabine L, FitzJohn, Richard G, Fu, Han, Gaythorpe, Katy A M, Green, William, Haw, David J, Hayes, Sarah, Hinsley, Wes, Imai, Natsuko, Laydon, Daniel J, Mangal, Tara D, Mellan, Thomas A, Mishra, Swapnil, Nedjati-Gilani, Gemma, Parag, Kris V, Thompson, Hayley A, Unwin, H Juliette T, Vollmer, Michaela A C, Walters, Caroline E, Wang, Haowei, Wang, Yuanrong, Xi, Xiaoyue, Ferguson, Neil M, Okell, Lucy C, Churcher, Thomas S, Arinaminpathy, Nimalan, Ghani, Azra C, Walker, Patrick G T, Hallett, Timothy B·2020·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has the potential to cause substantial disruptions to health services, due to cases overburdening the health system or response measures limiting usual programmatic activities. We aimed to quantify the extent to which disruptions to services for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries with high burdens of these diseases could lead to additional loss of life over the next 5 years. METHODS: Assuming a basic reproduction number of 3·0, we constructed four scenarios for possible responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: no action, mitigation for 6 months, suppression for 2 months, or suppression for 1 year. We used established transmission models of HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria to estimate the additional impact on health that could be caused in selected settings, either due to COVID-19 interventions limiting activities, or due to the high demand on the health system due to the COVID-19 pandemic. FINDINGS: In high-burden settings, deaths due to HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria over 5 years could increase by up to 10%, 20%, and 36%, respectively, compared with if there was no COVID-19 pandemic. The greatest impact on HIV was estimated to be from interruption to antiretroviral therapy, which could occur during a period of high health system demand. For tuberculosis, the greatest impact would be from reductions in timely diagnosis and treatment of new cases, which could result from any prolonged period of COVID-19 suppression interventions. The greatest impact on malaria burden could be as a result of interruption of planned net campaigns. These disruptions could lead to a loss of life-years over 5 years that is of the same order of magnitude as the direct impact from COVID-19 in places with a high burden of malaria and large HIV and tuberculosis epidemics. INTERPRETATION: Maintaining the most critical prevention activities and health-care services for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria could substantially reduce the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, UK Department for International Development, and Medical Research Council.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30288-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Smith, 2016, Maximising HIV prevention by balancing the opportunities of today with the promises of tomorrow: a modelling study, Lancet HIV, 3, e289, 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30036-4 · DOI
  2. Vesga, 2019, Assessing tuberculosis control priorities in high-burden settings: a modelling approach, Lancet Glob Health, 7, e585, 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30037-3 · DOI
  3. Griffin, 2016, Potential for reduction of burden and local elimination of malaria by reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission: a mathematical modelling study, Lancet Infect Dis, 16, 465, 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00423-5 · DOI
  4. Verity, 2020, Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis, Lancet Infect Dis, 20, 669, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Thornton, 2020, Covid-19: A&E visits in England fall by 25% in week after lockdown, BMJ, 369
  6. Black, 2020, COVID-19: the case for health-care worker screening to prevent hospital transmission, Lancet, 395, 1418, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30917-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. Plucinski, 2015, Effect of the Ebola-virus-disease epidemic on malaria case management in Guinea, 2014: a cross-sectional survey of health facilities, Lancet Infect Dis, 15, 1017, 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00061-4 · DOI
  8. Jewell, 2020, The potential impact of interruptions to HIV services: a modelling case study for South Africa, medRxiv
  9. Cilloni, 2020, The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis: a modelling analysis, medRxiv
  10. Kruk, 2015, What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola, Lancet, 385, 1910, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60755-3 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hogan, A. B., Jewell, B. L., Sherrard-Smith, E., Vesga, J. F., Watson, O. J., Whittaker, C., Hamlet, A., Smith, J. A., Winskill, P., Verity, R., Baguelin, M., Lees, J. A., Whittles, L. K., Ainslie, K. E. C., Bhatt, S., Boonyasiri, A., Brazeau, N. F., Cattarino, L., Cooper, L. V., Coupland, H., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Dighe, A., Djaafara, B. A., Donnelly, C. A., Eaton, J. W., van Elsland, S. L., FitzJohn, R. G., Fu, H., Gaythorpe, K. A. M., Green, W., Haw, D. J., Hayes, S., Hinsley, W., Imai, N., Laydon, D. J., Mangal, T. D., Mellan, T. A., Mishra, S., Nedjati-Gilani, G., Parag, K. V., Thompson, H. A., Unwin, H. J. T., Vollmer, M. A. C., Walters, C. E., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Xi, X., Ferguson, N. M., Okell, L. C., Churcher, T. S., Arinaminpathy, N., Ghani, A. C., Walker, P. G. T., & Hallett, T. B.
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
e1132-e1141
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041532377
Cited by
900
References
1
FWCI
28.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-01-01)
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Department for International Development, UK Government
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • European Commission
  • Department for International Development
  • Wellcome Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.