Does tobacco use cause psychosis? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the association between psychotic illness and cigarette smoking is well known, the reasons are unclear why people with psychosis are more likely to smoke than are the general population. We aimed to test several hypotheses. First, that daily tobacco use is associated with an increased risk of psychotic illness in both case-control and prospective studies. Second, that smoking is associated with an earlier age at onset of psychotic illness. Finally, that an earlier age at initiation of smoking is associated with an increased risk of psychosis. We also aimed to derive an estimate of the prevalence of smoking in patients presenting with their first episode of psychosis. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO and selected observational studies in which rates of smoking were reported in people with psychotic disorders, compared with controls. We calculated the weighted mean difference for age at onset of psychosis and age at initiation of smoking. For categorical outcomes, we calculated odds ratios from cross-sectional studies and risk ratios from prospective studies. FINDINGS: Of 3717 citations retrieved, 61 studies comprising 72 samples met inclusion criteria. The overall sample included 14 555 tobacco users and 273 162 non-users. The prevalence of smoking in patients presenting with their first episode of psychosis was 0·57 (95% CI 0·52-0·62; p<0·0001). In case-control studies, the overall odds ratio for the first episode of psychosis in smokers versus non-smokers was 3·22 (95% CI 1·63-6·33), with some evidence of publication bias (Egger's test p=0·018, Begg's test p=0·007). For prospective studies, we calculated an overall relative risk of new psychotic disorders in daily smokers versus non-smokers of 2·18 (95% CI 1·23-3·85). Daily smokers developed psychotic illness at an earlier age than did non-smokers (weighted mean difference -1·04 years, 95% CI -1·82 to -0·26). Those with psychosis started smoking at a non-significantly earlier age than did healthy controls (-0·44 years, 95% CI -1·21 to 0·34). INTERPRETATION: Daily tobacco use is associated with increased risk of psychosis and an earlier age at onset of psychotic illness. The possibility of a causal link between tobacco use and psychosis merits further examination. FUNDING: NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smoking is associated with heightened prospective risk of mental disorders, earlier age of onset, and adverse outcomes in those living with mental illness.
“These findings are in line with multiple meta-analyses showing that smoking is associated with a heightened prospective risk of mental disorders, earlier age of onset, and adverse outcomes in those living with mental illness 53,54 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
The Discussion reports that daily smoking was associated with a modestly increased prospective risk of psychotic disorder and earlier onset of psychosis; the Results also quantify the earlier onset. The paper addresses psychosis, not mental disorders generally, and the passages found do not establish adverse outcomes among people already living with mental illness. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRegular tobacco use is associated with a significantly heightened prospective risk of psychotic disorders, around two-fold (daily tobacco use RR=2.18, 95% CI 1.23-3.85; personal active smoking RR=1.99, 95% CI 1.1-3.61).
“These meta-analyses consistently found a significantly heightened prospective risk of psychotic disorders, of around two-fold for smokers vs. nonsmokers, in terms of daily tobacco use (n=6, RR=2.18, 95% CI: 1.23-3.85, I²=97.7%) 53 and 'personal active smoking' (n=6, RR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.1-3.61, I²=97%) 52 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Significant publication bias and high statistical heterogeneity were found in the meta-analyses of smoking and psychotic disorders.
“However, significant publication bias was indicated and high levels of statistical heterogeneity were found 52,53 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 300
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [16]Stroup DF Berlin JA Morton SC for the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting JAMA 283 2000 2008 2012 10789670
- Authors
- Gurillo, P., Jauhar, S., Murray, R. M., & MacCabe, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Quirón Torrevieja (ES)
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 718-725
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4698800
- OpenAlex
- W1750202769
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2015-08-01)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre
- Medical Research Council (MR/L011794/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Keywords
- tobacco use, smoking, psychosis, first-episode psychosis, age of onset, smoking initiation age, smoking prevalence, causal relationship, psychosis risk factors, publication bias, tobacco control, mental health services, smoking cessation, tobacco advertising restrictions, tobacco marketing restrictions, tobacco product regulation, tobacco control policy evaluation, tobacco control policy implementation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychoses, Substance-Induced, Psychotic Disorders, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review