Cited by 382Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Identity, and Health

Pre-migration and post-migration factors associated with mental health in humanitarian migrants in Australia and the moderation effect of post-migration stressors: findings from the first wave data of the BNLA cohort study

Chen, Wen, Hall, Brian J, Ling, Li, Renzaho, Andre MN·2017·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The process of becoming a humanitarian migrant is potentially damaging to mental health. We examined the association between pre-migration and post-migration potentially traumatic events and stressors and mental health, and assessed the moderating effect of post-migration stressors in humanitarian migrants in Australia. Methods In this study, we used the first wave of data between 2013 and 2014 from the Building a New Life in Australia survey. The survey included 2399 migrants who had arrived in Australia holding a permanent humanitarian visa 3-6 months preceding the survey, with 77% and 23% of participants being granted visas through offshore and onshore humanitarian programmes, respectively. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was measured with the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder 8 items (PTSD-8) and severe mental illness was measured with the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6). Pre-migration potentially traumatic events and post-migration stressors related to asylum process and resettlement were measured with a self-reported questionnaire. Findings Of the 2399 participants, 762 (31%; 95% CI 29·4-33·2) had PTSD and 394 (16%; 95% CI 14·2-17·2) had severe mental illness. The mean number of pre-migration potentially traumatic events was 2·1 (SD 1·4). 64%, 59%, 49%, and 18% of participants reported poor social integration, economic problems, worrying about family or friends overseas, and loneliness as post-migration stressors. Pre-migration pote…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30032-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 382

Authors
Chen, W., Hall, B. J., Ling, L., & Renzaho, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Wen
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
218-229
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2585063996
Cited by
382
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8
FWCI
50.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Medical Board
  • Department of Social Services, Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
Keywords
humanitarian migrants, mental health, post-traumatic stress disorder, severe mental illness, pre-migration trauma, post-migration stressors, social integration, loneliness, asylum procedure, moderating effect, refugee resettlement in Australia, psychological distress screening, Kessler K6, family separation
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Transients and Migrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review