Cited by 14Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsMental Health Treatment and AccessClinical practice guidelines implementation

Cochrane for global mental health

Open access
Barbui, Corrado, Purgato, Marianna, Churchill, Rachel, Adams, Clive, Amato, Laura, Macdonald, Geraldine, McCleery, Jenny, Minozzi, Silvia +1 more·2017·The Lancet Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30090-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socio-cultural differences in relation to psychological suffering exist, and the transposition of psychosocial interventions and models from Western to non-Western cultures might potentially influence therapeutic relationship and outcomes.

    “Socio-cultural differences in relation to the psychological suffering exist, and the transposition of psychosocial interventions and models from Western to non-Western cultures, with very different understandings and ways of dealing with psychological distress, might potentially influence therapeutic relationship and outcomes”

    From Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in asylum seekers and refugees: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Barbui et al., 2017

    In the section “Cochrane for global mental health” (page unavailable), the paper calls for culturally appropriate approaches and exchange between mental-health workers in different parts of the world. It does not say that transferring Western psychosocial models to non-Western cultures may affect therapeutic relationships or outcomes, or describe the asserted differences in experiences of psychological distress. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbui, C., Purgato, M., Churchill, R., Adams, C., Amato, L., Macdonald, G., McCleery, J., Minozzi, S., & Sheriff, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Regione Lazio (IT)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Corresponding author
Barbui, Corrado
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e6
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2598221021
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
Cochrane Collaboration, global mental health, systematic reviews, evidence-based care, access to evidence, health policy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Global Health, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review