Cited by 39Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychiatric care and mental health services

The economic case for improved coverage of public mental health interventions

Campion, Jonathan, Knapp, Martin·2018·The Lancet Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30433-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the UK, models and individual patient data analyses have reported cost savings and increased benefits (such as improvements on clinical outcome scales) associated with early intervention in psychosis services.

    “In the UK, models and individual patient data analyses have reported cost savings and increased benefits (such as improvements on clinical outcome scales) associated with early intervention in psychosis services.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [424]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campion, J., & Knapp, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Campion, Jonathan
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
103-105
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767235967
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
economic burden of mental disorders, cost of mental illness, mental disorder prevention, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Mental Health Services, Public Health, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review