Cited by 127Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health and Psychiatry

Comparison of a theoretically driven cognitive therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) with befriending for the treatment of persistent persecutory delusions: a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Open access
Freeman, Daniel, Emsley, Richard, Diamond, Rowan, Collett, Nicola, Bold, Emily, Chadwick, Eleanor, Isham, Louise, Bird, Jessica C +15 more·2021·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a large clinical need for improved treatments for patients with persecutory delusions. We aimed to test whether a new theoretically driven cognitive therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) would lead to large reductions in persecutory delusions, above non-specific effects of therapy. We also aimed to test treatment effect mechanisms. METHODS: We did a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial to test the Feeling Safe Programme against befriending with the same therapists for patients with persistent persecutory delusions in the context of non-affective psychosis diagnoses. Usual care continued throughout the duration of the trial. The trial took place in community mental health services in three UK National Health Service trusts. Participants were included if they were 16 years or older, had persecutory delusions (as defined by Freeman and Garety) for at least 3 months and held with at least 60% conviction, and had a primary diagnosis of non-affective psychosis from the referring clinical team. Patients were randomly assigned to either the Feeling Safe Programme or the befriending programme, using a permuted blocks algorithm with randomly varying block size, stratified by therapist. Trial assessors were masked to group allocation. If an allocation was unmasked then the unmasked assessor was replaced with a new masked assessor. Outcomes were assessed at 0 months, 6 months (primary endpoint), and 12 months. The primary outcome was persecutory delusion conviction, assessed within the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale (PSYRATS; rated 0-100%). Outcome analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Each intervention was provided individually over 6 months. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN18705064. FINDINGS: From Feb 8, 2016, to July 26, 2019, 130 patients with persecutory delusions (78 [60%] men; 52 [40%] women, mean age 42 years [SD 12·1, range 17-71]; 86% White, 9% Black, 2% Indian; 2·3% Pakistani; 2% other) were recruited. 64 patients were randomly allocated to the Feeling Safe Programme and 66 patients to befriending. Compared with befriending, the Feeling Safe Programme led to significant end of treatment reductions in delusional conviction (-10·69 [95% CI -19·75 to -1·63], p=0·021, Cohen's d=-0·86) and delusion severity (PSYRATS, -2·94 [-4·58 to -1·31], p<0·0001, Cohen's d=-1·20). More adverse events occurred in the befriending group (68 unrelated adverse events reported in 20 [30%] participants) compared with the Feeling Safe group (53 unrelated adverse events reported in 16 [25%] participants). INTERPRETATION: The Feeling Safe Programme led to a significant reduction in persistent persecutory delusions compared with befriending. To our knowledge, these are the largest treatment effects seen for patients with persistent delusions. The principal limitation of our trial was the relatively small sample size when comparing two active treatments, meaning less precision in effect size estimates and lower power to detect moderate treatment differences in secondary outcomes. Further research could be done to determine whether greater effects could be possible by reducing the hypothesised delusion maintenance mechanisms further. The Feeling Safe Programme could become the recommended psychological treatment in clinical services for persecutory delusions. FUNDING: NIHR Research Professorship and NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00158-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized controlled trial, Feeling Safe produced a large further reduction in persecutory delusions above an alternative psychological intervention delivered by the same therapists.

    “For example, in a randomized controlled trial, Feeling Safe produced a large further reduction in persecutory delusions above an alternative psychological intervention delivered by the same therapists (Freeman et al., 2021).”

    From A counterweight model for understanding and treating persecutory delusions. (2025) · cites this paper as Freeman et al., 2021

  • This approach generally produces a range of positive outcomes.

    “This approach generally produces a range of positive outcomes (Freeman et al., 2021; Jenner et al., 2024).”

    From A counterweight model for understanding and treating persecutory delusions. (2025) · cites this paper as Freeman et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 127

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Bighelli I Salanti G Huhn M Psychological interventions to reduce positive symptoms in schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta-analysis World Psychiatry 17 2018 316 329 30192101 PMC6127754
  2. [3]McGlanaghy E Turner D Davis GA A network meta-analysis of psychological interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis: impact on symptoms Schizophr Res 228 2021 447 459 33578368
  3. [6]Freeman D Startup H Dunn G Persecutory delusions and psychological well-being Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49 2014 1045 1050 24297621
  4. [7]Coid JW Ullrich S Kallis C The relationship between delusions and violence: findings from the East London first episode psychosis study JAMA Psychiatry 70 2013 465 471 23467760
  5. [9]Freeman D Pugh K Dunn G An early phase II randomized controlled trial testing the effect on persecutory delusions of using CBT to reduce negative cognitions about the self Schizophr Res 160 2014 186 192 25468186 PMC4266450
  6. [12]Freeman D Bradley J Antley A Virtual reality in the treatment of persecutory delusions: randomised controlled experimental study testing how to reduce delusional conviction Br J Psychiatry 209 2016 62 67 27151071 PMC4929408
  7. [14]Freeman D Bradley J Waite F Targeting recovery in persistent persecutory delusions: a proof of principle study of a new translational psychological treatment Behav Cogn Psychother 44 2016 539 552 27044885 PMC4988271
  8. [15]Sensky T Turkington D Kingdon D A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for persistent symptoms in schizophrenia resistant to medication Arch Gen Psychiatry 57 2000 165 172 10665619
  9. [16]Jackson HJ McGorry PD Killackey E Acute-phase and 1-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of CBT versus befriending for first-episode psychosis: the ACE project Psychol Med 38 2008 725 735 18005494
  10. [17]Freeman D Waite F Emsley R The efficacy of a new translational treatment for persecutory delusions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The Feeling Safe Study) Trials 17 2016 134 26969128 PMC4788840
  11. [18]Freeman D Garety PA Comments on the content of persecutory delusions: does the definition need clarification? Br J Clin Psychol 39 2000 407 414 11107494
  12. [21]Haddock G McCarron J Tarrier N Faragher EB Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: the psychotic symptom rating scales (PSYRATS) Psychol Med 29 1999 879 889 10473315
  13. [22]Freeman D Loe BS Kingdon D The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs Psychol Med 51 2021 244 253 31744588 PMC7893506
  14. [26]Ronald A Sieradzka D Cardno AG Haworth CM McGuire P Freeman D Characterization of psychotic experiences in adolescence using the specific psychotic experiences questionnaire: findings from a study of 5000 16-year-old twins Schizophr Bull 40 2014 868 877 24062593 PMC4059437
  15. [28]Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation Health Qual Life Outcomes 5 2007 63 80 18042300 PMC2222612
  16. [30]Peters M Potter CM Kelly L The Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire: conceptual framework and item development Patient Relat Outcome Meas 7 2016 109 125 27621678 PMC5012841
  17. [31]Greenwood KE Sweeney A Williams S CHoice of Outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): the development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis Schizophr Bull 36 2010 126 135 19880823 PMC2800145
  18. [32]Jolley S Garety PA Ellett L A validation of a new measure of activity in psychosis Schizophr Res 85 2006 288 295 16626943
  19. [36]Garety PA Freeman D Jolley S Reasoning, emotions, and delusional conviction in psychosis J Abnorm Psychol 114 2005 373 384 16117574
  20. [38]Freeman D Garety PA Kuipers E Persecutory delusions: developing the understanding of belief maintenance and emotional distress Psychol Med 31 2001 1293 1306 11681555
  21. [39]Marsden J Gossop M Stewart D The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome Addiction 93 1998 1857 1867 9926574
  22. [40]Davies LM Lewis S Jones PB Cost-effectiveness of first- v. second-generation antipsychotic drugs: results from a randomised controlled trial in schizophrenia responding poorly to previous therapy Br J Psychiatry 191 2007 14 22 17602120

Authors
Freeman, D., Emsley, R., Diamond, R., Collett, N., Bold, E., Chadwick, E., Isham, L., Bird, J. C., Edwards, D., Kingdon, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Kabir, T., Waite, F., Carr, L., Causier, C., Černis, E., Kirkham, M., Lambe, S., Lister, R., Rosebrock, L., Taylor, K. M., Teale, A.-L., & Twivy, E.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • McPin Foundation (GB)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Daniel
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
696-707
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175623641
Cited by
127
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR-RP-2014-05-003)
  • King's College London
  • University of Oxford
  • Wellcome Trust (102176/B/13/Z)
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20005)
  • Medical Research Council
  • HCA International Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
persecutory delusions, cognitive therapy, befriending, non-affective psychosis, therapist effects, community mental health services, psychosis treatment, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Delusions, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Psychotic Disorders, State Medicine, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review