The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health: advancing mental health services, research, and policy
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is lack of clarity among clinicians and researchers regarding how to assess psychological IPV because definitions and operationalization differ across and within disciplines and sectors.
“There is, for example, lack of clarity among clinicians and researchers regarding how to assess psychological IPV because definitions of IPV, and operationalization of definitions of IPV, differ across and within disciplines and sectors reflecting the different priorities of agencies (Sian Oram et al., 2022).”
From Global Prevalence and Mental Health Outcomes of Intimate Partner Violence Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Sian Oram et al., 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 327 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Oram, S., Fisher, H. L., Minnis, H., Seedat, S., Walby, S., Hegarty, K., Rouf, K., Angénieux, C., Callard, F., Chandra, P. S., Fazel, S., Garcia-Moreno, C., Henderson, M., Howarth, E., MacMillan, H. L., Murray, L. K., Othman, S., Robotham, D., Rondon, M. B., Sweeney, A., Taggart, D., & Howard, L. M.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- University of London (GB)
- Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
- Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of East London (GB)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Malaya (MY)
- McPin Foundation (GB)
- University of Essex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fisher, Helen L
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 487-524
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280556216
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 327
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation (ES/S004424/1)
- South African Medical Research Council
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
- Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, mental health, secondary mental health care, trauma exposure, IPV survivors, mental health services, mental health policy, research priorities, primary care, life course perspective, low- and middle-income countries, Philippines
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
