Untreatable or unable to treat? Creating more effective and accessible treatment for long-standing and severe eating disorders
Abstract
The evidence base for the treatment of severe eating disorders is limited. In addition to improving access to early intervention, there is a need to develop more effective treatments for complex presentations of eating disorders. For patients with long-standing and severe illnesses, particular difficulties might exist with their engagement with treatment and achieving treatment outcomes. Alarmingly, there is an emerging international discourse about a concept labelled as terminal anorexia and about the withdrawal of treatment for people with severe eating disorders, resulting in the death of patients, as a legitimate option. This concept has arisen in the context of vastly overstretched specialist services and insufficient research and funding for new treatments. This Personal View combines multiple perspectives from carers, patients, and mental health professionals based in the UK, highlighting how the risks of current service provision are best alleviated by increasing resources, capacity, and training, and not by a narrowing of the criteria according to which patients with eating disorders are offered the care and support they need.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Downs, J., Ayton, A., Collins, L., Baker, S., Missen, H., & Ibrahim, A.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Royal College of Psychiatrists (GB)
- Liverpool City Council (GB)
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146-154
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317790673
- Semantic Scholar
- 2ed1e0735b5f34648f9f2d029b94d1cf031da756
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2023-06-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- severe eating disorders, treatment withdrawal, treatment access, treatment engagement, specialist mental health services, service capacity, caregiver perspectives, patient perspectives
- MeSH terms
- Feeding and Eating Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Patients, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review