Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prognostic score for acute graft-versus-host disease based on biomarkers: a multicentre study

Open access
Levine, John E, Braun, Thomas M, Harris, Andrew C, Holler, Ernst, Taylor, Austin, Miller, Holly, Magenau, John, Weisdorf, Daniel J, Ho, Vincent T, Bolaños-Meade, Javier, Alousi, Amin M, Ferrara, James L M·2015·The Lancet Haematology

Abstract

SUMMARY Background Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). The severity of symptoms at the onset of GVHD does not accurately define risk, and thus most patients are treated alike with high dose systemic corticosteroids. We aimed to define clinically meaningful risk strata for patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD using plasma biomarkers. Methods We prospectively collected plasma from 492 HCT patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD and randomly divided them into training (n=328) and test (n=164) sets. We used the concentrations of three recently validated biomarkers (TNFR1, ST2, and REG3α) to create an algorithm that computed the probability of NRM six months after GVHD onset for individual patients in the training set alone. We rank ordered the probabilities and identified thresholds that created three distinct NRM scores. We evaluated the algorithm in the testset, and again in an independent validation set of 300 additional HCT patients enrolled on multicenter clinical trials of primary therapy for acute GVHD. Findings In all three datasets, the cumulative incidence of twelve month NRM significantly increased as the GVHD score increased (8% [95% confidence interval (CI); 3%, 16%], 27% [95% CI; 20%%, 34%], and 46% [95% CI; 33%, 58%], for scores 1, 2 and 3 respectively in the multicenter validation set, p<0 · 0001). Conversely, the response rates to primary GVHD treatment decreased as the GVHD score increased (86%, 67%, and 46%, for scores 1, 2 and 3 respectively in the multicenter validation set, p<0 · 0001). Interpretation Biomarker-based scores can be used to guide risk-adapted therapy at the onset of acute GVHD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-3026(14)00035-0

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Metadata

Authors
Levine, J. E., Braun, T. M., Harris, A. C., Holler, E., Taylor, A., Miller, H., Magenau, J., Weisdorf, D. J., Ho, V. T., Bolaños-Meade, J., Alousi, A. M., & Ferrara, J. L. M.
Venue
The Lancet Haematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e21-e29
ISSN
2352-3026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105179089
Cited by
309
References
28
FWCI
15.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prognostic score for acute graft-versus-host disease based on biomarkers: a multicentre study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2352-3026(14)00035-0
The paper
Levine, J. E., Braun, T. M., Harris, A. C., Holler, E., Taylor, A., Miller, H., Magenau, J., Weisdorf, D. J., Ho, V. T., Bolaños-Meade, J., Alousi, A. M., & Ferrara, J. L. M. (2015). A prognostic score for acute graft-versus-host disease based on biomarkers: a multicentre study. The Lancet Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(14)00035-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.