Cited by 119Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Adolescent resilience to addiction: a social plasticity hypothesis

Open access
Cousijn, Janna, Luijten, Maartje, Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W·2018·The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Abstract

The prevalence of substance use disorders is highest during adolescence; however, many adolescents experience a natural resolution of their substance use by early adulthood, without any formal intervention. Something appears to be unique and adaptive about the adolescent brain. In this Review, we examine the roles of the social environment and neurocognitive development in adolescents' natural resilience to substance use disorders. At present, little is known about the neurocognitive mechanisms that underlie this adaptive phenomenon, since neurodevelopmental studies have mainly focused on the risk side of the substance use equation: escalation of substance use. To provide a framework for future studies, we put forth a social plasticity model that includes developmentally limited enhanced social attunement (ie, the need to harmonise with the social environment), affective processing, and brain plasticity, which underlie adolescents' capacity to learn from and adapt to their constantly evolving social environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-4642(17)30148-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a lack of studies investigating cognitive domains and brain-based outcomes known to play a pivotal role in the vulnerability to addiction, such as cognitive control and social cognition, and the integrity of the underlying neural networks.

    “There was also a lack of studies investigating cognitive domains and brain-based outcomes known to play a pivotal role in the vulnerability to addiction, such as cognitive control (Cousijn et al., 2014) and social cognition (Cousijn et al., 2018), and the integrity of the underlying neural networks.”

    From Age-dependent Effects of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine on Cognition and the Brain: A Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature Comparing Adolescents and Adults. (2023) · cites this paper as Cousijn et al., 2018

    The ‘Implications of adolescent brain development in the context of substance use’ section proposes that development of the social cognition network might increase adolescents’ willingness to use substances with peers. It also says little is known about the relevant neural mechanisms. Thus the paper supports social cognition as a proposed factor in vulnerability, but not as one known to play a pivotal role. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [28]28. Winick C. Maturing out of narcotic addiction. Bull Narc 1962; 14: 1-7.
  2. [68]68. Review 68

Authors
Cousijn, J., Luijten, M., & Feldstein Ewing, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Cousijn, Janna
Venue
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
2352-4642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769966273
Cited by
119
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R01AA023658–01)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent resilience, substance use disorders, adolescent brain development, social environment, social attunement, emotional processing, neuroplasticity, neurocognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review