Cited by 63Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and TransplantationAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Implementation of a liver health check in people with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Abeysekera, Kushala W M, Valenti, Luca, Younossi, Zobair, Dillon, John F, Allen, Alina M, Noureddin, Mazen, Rinella, Mary E, Tacke, Frank +20 more·2024·The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

As morbidity and mortality related to potentially preventable liver diseases are on the rise globally, early detection of liver fibrosis offers a window of opportunity to prevent disease progression. Early detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease allows for initiation and reinforcement of guidance on bodyweight management, risk stratification for advanced liver fibrosis, and treatment optimisation of diabetes and other metabolic complications. Identification of alcohol-related liver disease provides the opportunity to support patients with detoxification and abstinence programmes. In all patient groups, identification of cirrhosis ensures that patients are enrolled in surveillance programmes for hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. When considering early detection strategies, success can be achieved from applying ad-hoc screening for liver fibrosis in established frameworks of care. Patients with type 2 diabetes are an important group to consider case findings of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, as up to 19% have advanced fibrosis (which is ten times higher than the general population) and almost 70% have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Additionally, patients with type 2 diabetes with alcohol use disorders have the highest proportion of liver-related morbidity of people with type 2 diabetes generally. Patients with type 2 diabetes receive an annual diabetes review as part of their routine clinical care, in which the health of many organs are considered. Yet, liver health is seldom included in this review. This Viewpoint argues that augmenting the existing risk stratification strategy with an additional liver health check provides the opportunity to detect advanced liver fibrosis, thereby opening a window for early interventions to prevent end-stage liver disease and its complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00270-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach also serves to stratify individuals into clinical care pathways according to their risk of developing liver-related outcomes.

    “This approach also serves to stratify individuals into clinical care pathways ( e.g. general practitioner, diabetologist, hepatology specialist referral) according to their risk of developing liver-related outcomes.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [174]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says a Liver Health Check offers risk stratification for advanced liver fibrosis, and Barriers (page unavailable) discusses automated pathways and referrals. The retrieved passages do not establish that the check assigns people to different clinical care pathways according to their risk of liver-related outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 63

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. Castera L, Vidal-Trecan T, Vallet Pichard A, Gault N, Paradis V, Czernichow S, et al. High rate of biopsy-proven advanced fibrosis among type 2 diabetes patients screened for NAFLD in diabetes units. Hepatology. 2021;74:1017A.

Authors
Abeysekera, K. W. M., Valenti, L., Younossi, Z., Dillon, J. F., Allen, A. M., Noureddin, M., Rinella, M. E., Tacke, F., Francque, S., Ginès, P., Thiele, M., Newsome, P. N., Guha, I. N., Eslam, M., Schattenberg, J. M., Alqahtani, S. A., Arrese, M., Berzigotti, A., Holleboom, A. G., Caussy, C., Cusi, K., Roden, M., Hagström, H., Wong, V. W.-S., Mallet, V., Castera, L., Lazarus, J. V., & Tsochatzis, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Bristol Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Inova Health System (US)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Tsochatzis, Emmanuel A
Venue
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
83-91
ISSN
  • 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-1253
OpenAlex
W4389366628
Cited by
63
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-03-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals
  • Danone
  • Inventiva Pharma
  • Intercept Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2022-25-006)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL029\1006)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Siemens Healthineers
  • Ipsen
  • Julius Clinical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, liver fibrosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, alcoholism, HCC surveillance, risk stratification, early detection
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fibrosis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review