Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups in England from 2020 to 2022: a retrospective cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been shown to differently affect various demographic and clinical population subgroups. We aimed to describe trends in absolute and relative COVID-19-related mortality risks across clinical and demographic population subgroups during successive SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study in England using the OpenSAFELY platform with the approval of National Health Service England, covering the first five SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves (wave one [wild-type] from March 23 to May 30, 2020; wave two [alpha (B.1.1.7)] from Sept 7, 2020, to April 24, 2021; wave three [delta (B.1.617.2)] from May 28 to Dec 14, 2021; wave four [omicron (B.1.1.529)] from Dec 15, 2021, to April 29, 2022; and wave five [omicron] from June 24 to Aug 3, 2022). In each wave, we included people aged 18-110 years who were registered with a general practice on the first day of the wave and who had at least 3 months of continuous general practice registration up to this date. We estimated crude and sex-standardised and age-standardised wave-specific COVID-19-related death rates and relative risks of COVID-19-related death in population subgroups. FINDINGS: 18 895 870 adults were included in wave one, 19 014 720 in wave two, 18 932 050 in wave three, 19 097 970 in wave four, and 19 226 475 in wave five. Crude COVID-19-related death rates per 1000 person-years decreased from 4·48 deaths (95% CI 4·41-4·55) in wave one to 2·69 (2·66-2·72) in wave two, 0·64 (0·63-0·66) in wave three, 1·01 (0·99-1·03) in wave four, and 0·67 (0·64-0·71) in wave five. In wave one, the standardised COVID-19-related death rates were highest in people aged 80 years or older, people with chronic kidney disease stage 5 or 4, people receiving dialysis, people with dementia or learning disability, and people who had received a kidney transplant (ranging from 19·85 deaths per 1000 person-years to 44·41 deaths per 1000 person-years, compared with from 0·05 deaths per 1000 person-years to 15·93 deaths per 1000 person-years in other subgroups). In wave two compared with wave one, in a largely unvaccinated population, the decrease in COVID-19-related mortality was evenly distributed across population subgroups. In wave three compared with wave one, larger decreases in COVID-19-related death rates were seen in groups prioritised for primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, including people aged 80 years or older and people with neurological disease, learning disability, or severe mental illness (90-91% decrease). Conversely, smaller decreases in COVID-19-related death rates were observed in younger age groups, people who had received organ transplants, and people with chronic kidney disease, haematological malignancies, or immunosuppressive conditions (0-25% decrease). In wave four compared with wave one, the decrease in COVID-19-related death rates was smaller in groups with lower vaccination coverage (including younger age groups) and conditions associated with impaired vaccine response, including people who had received organ transplants and people with immunosuppressive conditions (26-61% decrease). INTERPRETATION: There was a substantial decrease in absolute COVID-19-related death rates over time in the overall population, but demographic and clinical relative risk profiles persisted and worsened for people with lower vaccination coverage or impaired immune response. Our findings provide an evidence base to inform UK public health policy for protecting these vulnerable population subgroups. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust, UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health and Care Research, and Health Data Research UK.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since 2021, mortality due to the pandemic has declined.
“Reports published as recently as 2023 have shown that since 2021, mortality due to the pandemic has declined,38, 39 presumably driven by vaccination efforts, public policies, individual behaviour changes, and the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants with lower case-fatality ratios.40, 41”
From Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950–2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Nab, L., Parker, E. P. K., Andrews, C. D., Hulme, W. J., Fisher, L., Morley, J., Mehrkar, A., MacKenna, B., Inglesby, P., Morton, C. E., Bacon, S. C. J., Hickman, G., Evans, D., Ward, T., Smith, R. M., Davy, S., Dillingham, I., Maude, S., Butler-Cole, B. F. C., O’Dwyer, T., Stables, C. L., Bridges, L., Bates, C., Cockburn, J., Parry, J., Hester, F., Harper, S., Zheng, B., Williamson, E. J., Eggo, R. M., Evans, S. J. W., Goldacre, B., Tomlinson, L. A., & Walker, A. J.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walker, Alex J
- ORCID
- Nab, Linda
- Parker, Edward P K
- Andrews, Colm D
- Hulme, William J
- Fisher, Louis
- Morley, Jessica
- Mehrkar, Amir
- MacKenna, Brian
- Inglesby, Peter
- Morton, Caroline E
- Hickman, George
- Evans, David
- Ward, Tom
- Davy, Simon
- Maude, Steven
- O’Dwyer, Thomas
- Stables, Catherine L
- Bridges, Lucy
- Cockburn, Jonathan
- Hester, Frank
- Zheng, Bang
- Williamson, Elizabeth J
- Eggo, Rosalind M
- Evans, Stephen J W
- Goldacre, Ben
- Tomlinson, Laurie A
- Walker, Alex J
- Venue
- The Lancet Public Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e364-e377
- ISSN
- 2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10139026
- OpenAlex
- W4367185783
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (222097/Z/20/Z)
- Mohn Westlake Foundation
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
- Health Data Research UK (HDRUK2021.000)
- UK Research and Innovation (MC_PC_20058)
- Bennett Foundation
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research
- British Lung Foundation
- Asthma and Lung UK
- Health Foundation
- World Health Organization
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC-20059, MR/V015757/1, MR/W016729/1)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (COV-LT2-0073, NIHR135559)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- COVID-19 mortality, demographic subgroups, clinical subgroups, mortality trends, relative risk, age-standardized mortality rates, SARS-CoV-2 variants, Omicron variant, Delta variant, Alpha variant, OpenSAFELY, general practice data, health disparities, COVID-19 vaccination
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adult, Demography, England, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Retrospective Studies, State Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review