Cited by 85Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Investing in bereavement care as a public health priority

Open access
Lichtenthal, Wendy G, Roberts, Kailey E, Donovan, Leigh A, Breen, Lauren J, Aoun, Samar M, Connor, Stephen R, Rosa, William E·2024·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality associated with bereavement is an important public health issue, yet economic and resource investments to effectively implement and sustain integrated bereavement services are sorely lacking at national and global levels. Although bereavement support is a component of palliative care provision, continuity of care for bereaved individuals is often not standard practice in palliative and end-of-life contexts. In addition to potentially provoking feelings of abandonment, failure to extend family-centred care after a patient's death can leave bereaved families without access to crucial psychosocial support and at risk for illnesses that exacerbate the already substantial public health toll of interpersonal loss. The effect of inadequate bereavement care disproportionately disadvantages vulnerable groups, including those living in resource-constrained settings. We build on available evidence and previous recommendations to propose a model for transitional care, firmly establishing bereavement care services within health-care institutions, while respecting their finite resources and the need to ultimately transition grieving families to supports within their communities. Key to the transitional bereavement care model is the bolstering of community-based supports through development of compassionate communities and upskilling of professional services for those with more substantial bereavement support needs. To achieve this goal, interprofessional health workers, institutions, and systems must shift bereavement care from an afterthought to a public health priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00030-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surviving family members are frequently confronted with a complex mix of grief, stigma, and structural vulnerability that adversely affects their mental and physical well-being.

    “Surviving family members are frequently confronted with a complex mix of grief, stigma, and structural vulnerability5,6,7 that adversely affects their mental8,9,10,11 and physical well-being.9”

    From Mortality Risk Following a Household Suicide (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction describes grief-related suffering and inequities in access to bereavement care; the Abstract says inadequate care disproportionately disadvantages vulnerable groups. These passages support grief and structural vulnerability, but the paper passages do not establish stigma as part of the mix. The mental and physical well-being outcomes have separate citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Kreicbergs U, Valdimarsdóttir U, Onelöv E, Henter JI, Steineck G. Anxiety and depression in parents 4–9 years after the loss of a child owing to a malignancy: a population-based follow-up. Psychol Med 2004; 34: 1431– 41. 15724874
  2. [3]Lichtenthal WG, Breitbart W. The central role of meaning in adjustment to the loss of a child to cancer: implications for the development of meaning-centered grief therapy. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015; 9: 46– 51. 25588204 PMC4361184
  3. [4]van den Berg GJ, Lundborg P, Vikstrom J. The economics of grief. Econ J 2017; 127: 1794– 832.
  4. [5]Prigerson H, Silverman GK, Jacobs S, Maciejewski P, Kasl SV, Rosenheck R. Traumatic grief, disability, and the underutilization of health services: a preliminary look. Prim Psychiatry 2001; 8: 61– 69.
  5. [6]Li J, Johansen C, Hansen D, Olsen J. Cancer incidence in parents who lost a child: a nationwide study in Denmark. Cancer 2002; 95: 2237– 42. 12412179
  6. [7]Li J, Precht DH, Mortensen PB, Olsen J. Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: a nationwide follow-up study. Lancet 2003; 361: 363– 67. 12573371
  7. [9]Hamama-Raz Y, Ben-Ezra M, Levin Y. The need for a national bereavement model: the Israeli case. Lancet 2023; 402: 1971– 72. 37952547
  8. [10]Knaul FM, Farmer PE, Krakauer EL, Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet 2018; 391: 1391– 454. 29032993
  9. [11]Radbruch L, De Lima L, Knaul F, Redefining palliative care— a new consensus-based definition. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60: 754– 64. 32387576 PMC8096724
  10. [12]Aoun SM. Bereavement support: from the poor cousin of palliative care to a core asset of compassionate communities. Prog Palliat Care 2020; 28: 107– 14.
  11. [13]Aoun SM, Rumbold B, Howting D, Bolleter A, Breen LJ. Bereavement support for family caregivers: the gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0184750. 28977013 PMC5627900
  12. [14]Lichtenthal WG, Roberts KE, Ferrell BR. Bereavement care: walking the walk. J Palliat Med 2021; 24: 805– 06. 34061671
  13. [15]Sallnow L, Smith R, Ahmedzai SH, Report of the Lancet Commission on the value of death: bringing death back into life. Lancet 2022; 399: 837– 84. 35114146 PMC8803389
  14. [16]Aoun SM. Supporting the dying is a community responsibility. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2022; 16: 1– 4. PMC9210074 35747710
  15. [17]Aoun SM, Breen LJ, White I, Rumbold B, Kellehear A. What sources of bereavement support are perceived helpful by bereaved people and why? Empirical evidence for the compassionate communities approach. Palliat Med 2018; 32: 1378– 88. 29754514 PMC6088515
  16. [18]Spiker M, Paulsen K, Mehta AK. Primary palliative care education in US residencies and fellowships: a systematic review of program leadership perspectives. J Palliat Med 2020; 23: 1392– 99. 32757977
  17. [19]Kusano AS, Kenworthy-Heinige T, Thomas CR Jr. Survey of bereavement practices of cancer care and palliative care physicians in the Pacific northwest United States. J Oncol Pract 2012; 8: 275– 81. 23277763 PMC3439226
  18. [20]Donovan LA, Wakefield CE, Russell V, Cohn RJ. Hospital-based bereavement services following the death of a child: a mixed study review. Palliat Med 2015; 29: 193– 210. 25395578
  19. [21]Breen LJ, Kawashima D, Joy K, Grief literacy: a call to action for compassionate communities. Death Stud 2022; 46: 425– 33. 32189580
  20. [23]Breen LJ. Harnessing social support for bereavement now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2021; 15: 2632352420988009. PMC8164552 34104884
  21. [24]Roberts KE, Lichtenthal WG, Ferrell BR. Being a bereavement-conscious hospice and palliative care clinician. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2021; 23: 293– 95. 34185724
  22. [25]Aoun SM, Breen LJ, O’Connor M, Rumbold B, Nordstrom C. A public health approach to bereavement support services in palliative care. Aust N Z J Public Health 2012; 36: 14– 16. 22313700
  23. [27]Killikelly C, Smid GE, Wagner B, Boelen PA. Responding to the new International Classification of Diseases-11 prolonged grief disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic: a new bereavement network and three-tiered model of care. Public Health 2021; 191: 85– 90. 33556639
  24. [30]Knaul FM, Bhadelia A, Atun R, Frenk J. Achieving effective universal health coverage and diagonal approaches to care for chronic illnesses. Health Aff 2015; 34: 1514– 22. 26355053

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichtenthal, W. G., Roberts, K. E., Donovan, L. A., Breen, L. J., Aoun, S. M., Connor, S. R., & Rosa, W. E.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance (GB)
Corresponding author
Lichtenthal, Wendy G
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e270-e274
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392743052
Cited by
85
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 8
FWCI
42.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30 CA240139, P30 CA008748)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
bereavement support, grief, palliative care, end-of-life care, continuity of care, care transitions, community-based support, compassionate communities, psychosocial support, family-centered care, resource-limited settings, public health investment, interprofessional collaboration
MeSH terms
Bereavement, Health Priorities, Humans, Public Health, Social Support, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review