Cited by 32Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The public health risks of counterfeit pills

Open access
Friedman, Joseph, Ciccarone, Daniel·2025·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

Synthetic illicit drugs, such as nitazenes and fentanyls, are becoming commonplace in countries around the world, including in Europe, Australia, and Latin America, which raises concern for overdose crises like those seen in North America. An important dimension of the risk represented by synthetic drugs is the fact that they are increasingly packaged in counterfeit pill form. These pills-often indistinguishable from authentic pharmaceuticals-have substantially widened the scope of populations susceptible to synthetic drug overdose in North America (eg, among adolescents experimenting with pills or tourists from the USA seeking psychoactive medications from pharmacies in Mexico). The non-medical use of diverted prescription medications is relatively more common, and less stigmatised, than the use of powder drugs. Many consumers of counterfeit pills are unaware that they contain synthetic illicit drugs, believe them to be authentic pharmaceuticals, and would be unlikely to consume those drugs knowingly or if in powder form. Given these issues, we recommend the expansion of educational and awareness campaigns, pill testing programmes to help consumers shift demand to safer products, increased monitoring in routine clinical scenarios and overdose death toxicology, and expanding medically managed safer alternatives to counterfeit pill use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00273-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Palamar, 2024, National and regional trends in fentanyl seizures in the United States, 2017–2023, Int J Drug Policy, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104417 · DOI
  2. Friedman, 2024, The overdose crisis among US adolescents, N Engl J Med, 390, 97, 10.1056/NEJMp2312084 · DOI
  3. Daniulaityte, 2022, “They say it's fentanyl, but they honestly look like Perc 30s”: initiation and use of counterfeit fentanyl pills, Harm Reduct J, 19, 52, 10.1186/s12954-022-00634-4 · DOI
  4. Ciccarone, 2019, The triple wave epidemic: supply and demand drivers of the US opioid overdose crisis, Int J Drug Policy, 71, 183, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beletsky, 2017, Today's fentanyl crisis: prohibition's iron law, revisited, Int J Drug Policy, 46, 156, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.050 · DOI
  6. Mars, 2018, Sold as heroin: perceptions and use of an evolving drug in Baltimore, MD, J Psychoactive Drugs, 50, 167, 10.1080/02791072.2017.1394508 · DOI
  7. Ciccarone, 2021, The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis, Curr Opin Psychiatry, 34, 344, 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000717 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Friedman, 2023, Charting the fourth wave: geographic, temporal, race/ethnicity and demographic trends in polysubstance fentanyl overdose deaths in the United States, 2010–2021, Addiction, 118, 2477, 10.1111/add.16318 · DOI
  9. Wightman, 2024, Substances in counterfeit prescription pills seized by law enforcement, 2017–2022, JAMA, 331, 1860, 10.1001/jama.2024.6161 · DOI
  10. Friedman, 2023, Fentanyl, heroin, and methamphetamine-based counterfeit pills sold at tourist-oriented pharmacies in Mexico: an ethnographic and drug checking study, Drug Alcohol Depend, 249, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110819 · DOI
  11. Holland, 2024, Nitazenes–heralding a second wave for the UK drug-related death crisis?, Lancet Public Health, 9, e71, 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00001-X · DOI · Paper page
  12. Man, 2024, Availability of nitazenes for purchase in Australia and internationally via cryptomarkets, UNSW Sydney
  13. Friedman, 2024, Commentary on Copeland et al.: does xylazine in the United Kingdom foreshadow a European synthetic polysubstance drug crisis?, Addiction, 119, 1310, 10.1111/add.16498 · DOI
  14. Friedman, 2022, Trends in drug overdose deaths among US adolescents, January 2010 to June 2021, JAMA, 327, 1398, 10.1001/jama.2022.2847 · DOI
  15. Laing, 2021, An outbreak of novel psychoactive substance benzodiazepines in the unregulated drug supply: preliminary results from a community drug checking program using point-of-care and confirmatory methods, Int J Drug Policy, 93, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103169 · DOI
  16. Gjersing, 2022, Increasing trend in accidental pharmaceutical opioid overdose deaths and diverging overdose death correlates following the opioid prescription policy liberalization in Norway 2010–2018, Int J Drug Policy, 108, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103785 · DOI
  17. Griffiths PN, Seyler T, De Morais JM, Mounteney JE, Sedefov RS. Opioid problems are changing in Europe with worrying signals that synthetic opioids may play a more significant role in the future. Addiction; 119: 1334–36. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Caulkins, 2024, The Baltic and Nordic responses to the first Taliban poppy ban: implications for Europe & synthetic opioids today, Int J Drug Policy, 124, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104314 · DOI
  19. Friedman, 2024, Tracking drug overdose in Latin America: the epidemiological potential of prehospital and emergency department data, Am J Public Health, 114, 1153, 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307862 · DOI
  20. McAuley, 2022, From the clinic to the street: the changing role of benzodiazepines in the Scottish overdose epidemic, Int J Drug Policy, 100, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103512 · DOI
  21. Copeland, 2024, Broad evidence of xylazine in the UK illicit drug market beyond heroin supplies: triangulating from toxicology, drug-testing and law enforcement, Addiction, 119, 1301, 10.1111/add.16466 · DOI
  22. Roxburgh, 2022, Twenty-year trends in pharmaceutical fentanyl and illicit fentanyl deaths, Australia 2001-2021, Int J Drug Policy, 109, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103854 · DOI
  23. Geddes, 2018, Intravenous fentanyl use among people who inject drugs in Australia, Drug Alcohol Rev, 37, S314
  24. Schumann, 2023, Intoxications in an Australian emergency department involving 'nitazene’ benzylbenzimidazole synthetic opioids (etodesnitazene, butonitazene and protonitazene), J Anal Toxicol, 47, e6, 10.1093/jat/bkac062 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fischer, 2022, School-based harm reduction with adolescents: a pilot study, Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 17, 79, 10.1186/s13011-022-00502-1 · DOI
  26. Calihan, 2024, The call for a school-based approach to opioid overdose prevention, Am J Public Health, 114, 1305, 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307849 · DOI
  27. Bailey, 2023, Drug checking in the fentanyl era: utilization and interest among people who inject drugs in San Diego, California, Int J Drug Policy, 118, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104086 · DOI
  28. Bardwell, 2019, “We don't got that kind of time, man. We're trying to get high!”: exploring potential use of drug checking technologies among structurally vulnerable people who use drugs, Int J Drug Policy, 71, 125, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.018 · DOI
  29. Davis, 2022, Substance use stigma and community drug checking: a qualitative study examining barriers and possible responses, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19, 10.3390/ijerph192315978 · DOI
  30. Rosenblum, 2020, The rapidly changing US illicit drug market and the potential for an improved early warning system: evidence from Ohio Drug Crime Labs, Drug Alcohol Depend, 208, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107779 · DOI
  31. Friedman, 2021, Racial/ethnic, social, and geographic trends in overdose-associated cardiac arrests observed by US emergency medical services during the COVID-19 pandemic, JAMA Psychiatry
  32. Khangura, 2022, Clinical effectiveness of opioid substitution treatment: CADTH Health Technology Review. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Canadian Journal of Health Technologies
  33. Ivsins, 2020, Tackling the overdose crisis: the role of safe supply, Int J Drug Policy, 80, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102769 · DOI
  34. Haines, 2023, Safer opioid supply: qualitative program evaluation, Harm Reduct J, 20, 53, 10.1186/s12954-023-00776-z · DOI
  35. Mansoor, 2023, Community partner perspectives on the implementation of a novel safer supply program in Canada: a qualitative study of the MySafe Project, Harm Reduct J, 20, 61, 10.1186/s12954-023-00789-8 · DOI
  36. Kolla, 2024, Substance use care innovations during COVID-19: barriers and facilitators to the provision of safer supply at a Toronto COVID-19 isolation and recovery site, Harm Reduct J, 21, 17, 10.1186/s12954-024-00935-w · DOI
  37. Fischer, 2023, “Safer drug supply” measures in Canada to reduce the drug overdose fatality toll: clarifying concepts, practices and evidence within a public health intervention framework, J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 84, 801
  38. Olding, 2020, A low-barrier and comprehensive community-based harm-reduction site in Vancouver, Canada, Am J Public Health, 110, 833, 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305612 · DOI
  39. van Dijk, 2019, Law enforcement and public health: recognition and enhancement of joined-up solutions, Lancet, 393, 287, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32839-3 · DOI
  40. Collins, 2019, Policing space in the overdose crisis: a rapid ethnographic study of the impact of law enforcement practices on the effectiveness of overdose prevention sites, Int J Drug Policy, 73, 199, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.08.002 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, J., & Ciccarone, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Friedman, Joseph
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
e58-e62
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406071335
Cited by
32
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 10
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-03-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA049644, R01 DA054190-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
synthetic drugs, nitazenes, fentanyl analogs, drug overdose, pill testing, public health risk, consumer awareness, safer alternatives, adolescents
MeSH terms
Humans, Public Health, Illicit Drugs, Counterfeit Drugs, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review