Cited by 124Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Development and validation of the automated imaging differentiation in parkinsonism (AID-P): a multicentre machine learning study

Open access
Archer, Derek B, Bricker, Justin T, Chu, Winston T, Burciu, Roxana G, McCracken, Johanna L, Lai, Song, Coombes, Stephen A, Fang, Ruogu +23 more·2019·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of valid, non-invasive biomarkers for parkinsonian syndromes is crucially needed. We aimed to assess whether non-invasive diffusion-weighted MRI can distinguish between parkinsonian syndromes using an automated imaging approach. METHODS: We did an international study at 17 MRI centres in Austria, Germany, and the USA. We used diffusion-weighted MRI from 1002 patients and the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) to develop and validate disease-specific machine learning comparisons using 60 template regions and tracts of interest in Montreal Neurological Institute space between Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism (multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy) and between multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. For each comparison, models were developed on a training and validation cohort and evaluated in an independent test cohort by quantifying the area under the curve (AUC) of receiving operating characteristic curves. The primary outcomes were free water and free-water-corrected fractional anisotropy across 60 different template regions. FINDINGS: In the test cohort for disease-specific comparisons, the diffusion-weighted MRI plus MDS-UPDRS III model (Parkinson's disease vs atypical parkinsonism had an AUC 0·962; multiple system atrophy vs progressive supranuclear palsy AUC 0·897) and diffusion-weighted MRI only model had high AUCs (Parkinson's disease vs atypical parkinsonism AUC 0·955; multiple system atrophy vs progressive supranuclear palsy AUC 0·926), whereas the MDS-UPDRS III only models had significantly lower AUCs (Parkinson's disease vs atypical parkinsonism 0·775; multiple system atrophy vs progressive supranuclear palsy 0·582). These results indicate that a non-invasive imaging approach is capable of differentiating forms of parkinsonism comparable to current gold standard methods. INTERPRETATIONS: This study provides an objective, validated, and generalisable imaging approach to distinguish different forms of parkinsonian syndromes using multisite diffusion-weighted MRI cohorts. The diffusion-weighted MRI method does not involve radioactive tracers, is completely automated, and can be collected in less than 12 min across 3T scanners worldwide. The use of this test could positively affect the clinical care of patients with Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism and reduce the number of misdiagnosed cases in clinical trials. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and Parkinson's Foundation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30105-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of diverse perspectives can negatively impact resulting products.

    “Lack of diverse perspectives can negatively impact resulting products, as has plagued the AI field for years [73, 74].”

    From Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles (2024) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Discussion describes geographically diverse MRI cohorts and reports that the imaging model worked across MRI platforms. It does not address diversity of perspectives among people developing AI or whether a lack of those perspectives harms resulting products. Searches for diversity, perspectives, representation, and bias found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology. 1996; 47(1): 1– 9. 8710059
  2. [2]Litvan I, Goetz CG, Jankovic J, Wenning GK, Booth V, Bartko JJ, What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54(8): 937– 44. 9267967
  3. [3]Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees AJ. The accuracy of diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 4): 861– 70. 11912118
  4. [4]Beach TG, Adler CH. Importance of low diagnostic Accuracy for early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018; 33(10): 1551– 4. 30288780 PMC6544441
  5. [5]Adler CH, Beach TG, Hentz JG, Shill HA, Caviness JN, Driver-Dunckley E, Low clinical diagnostic accuracy of early vs advanced Parkinson disease: clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2014; 83(5): 406– 12. 24975862 PMC4132570
  6. [6]Jankovic J, Rajput AH, McDermott MP, Perl DP. The evolution of diagnosis in early Parkinson disease. Parkinson Study Group. Arch Neurol. 2000; 57(3): 369– 72. 10714663
  7. [7]Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992; 55(3): 181– 4. 1564476 PMC1014720
  8. [8]Perlmutter JS, Norris SA. Neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease: facts and fantasy. Ann Neurol. 2014; 76(6): 769– 83. 25363872 PMC4245400
  9. [9]Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. 1996. J Magn Reson. 2011; 213(2): 560– 70. 22152371
  10. [10]Planetta PJ, Ofori E, Pasternak O, Burciu RG, Shukla P, DeSimone JC, Free-water imaging in Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonism. Brain. 2016; 139(Pt 2): 495– 508. 26705348 PMC5790142
  11. [11]Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008; 71(9): 670– 6. 18725592 PMC2676993
  12. [12]Goetz CG, Stebbins GT, Tilley BC. Calibration of unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale scores to Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale scores. Mov Disord. 2012; 27(10): 1239– 42. 22886777
  13. [13]Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(2): 782– 90. 21979382
  14. [14]Pasternak O, Sochen N, Gur Y, Intrator N, Assaf Y. Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 62(3): 717– 30. 19623619
  15. [15]Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang MC, Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage. 2009; 46(3): 786– 802. 19195496 PMC2747506
  16. [16]Archer DB, Vaillancourt DE, Coombes SA. A Template and Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Sensorimotor Tracts using Diffusion MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2018; 28(5): 1685– 99. 28334314 PMC5907352
  17. [17]van Baarsen KM, Kleinnijenhuis M, Jbabdi S, Sotiropoulos SN, Grotenhuis JA, van Cappellen van Walsum AM. A probabilistic atlas of the cerebellar white matter. Neuroimage. 2016; 124(Pt A): 724– 32. 26385011
  18. [18]Archer DB, Coombes SA, McFarland NR, DeKosky ST, Vaillancourt DE. Development of a transcallosal tractography template and its application to dementia. Neuroimage. 2019. PMC6703915 31260838
  19. [19]Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011; 12: 2825– 30.
  20. [20]DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44(3): 837– 45. 3203132
  21. [21]Fortin JP, Parker D, Tunc B, Watanabe T, Elliott MA, Ruparel K, Harmonization of multisite diffusion tensor imaging data. Neuroimage. 2017; 161: 149– 70. 28826946 PMC5736019
  22. [22]Dickson DW. Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: neuropathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012; 2(8). PMC3405828 22908195
  23. [23]Scherfler C, Gobel G, Muller C, Nocker M, Wenning GK, Schocke M, Diagnostic potential of automated subcortical volume segmentation in atypical parkinsonism. Neurology. 2016; 86(13): 1242– 9. 26935895
  24. [24]Tang CC, Poston KL, Eckert T, Feigin A, Frucht S, Gudesblatt M, Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a metabolic imaging study using pattern analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(2): 149– 58. 20061183 PMC4617666
  25. [25]Tripathi M, Tang CC, Feigin A, De Lucia I, Nazem A, Dhawan V, Automated Differential Diagnosis of Early Parkinsonism Using Metabolic Brain Networks: A Validation Study. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(1): 60– 6. 26449840
  26. [26]Barbagallo G, Sierra-Pena M, Nemmi F, Traon AP, Meissner WG, Rascol O, Multimodal MRI assessment of nigro-striatal pathway in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson disease. Mov Disord. 2016; 31(3): 325– 34. 26676922
  27. [27]Hansson O, Janelidze S, Hall S, Magdalinou N, Lees AJ, Andreasson U, Blood-based NfL: A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder. Neurology. 2017; 88(10): 930– 7. 28179466 PMC5333515
  28. [29]Koga S, Aoki N, Uitti RJ, van Gerpen JA, Cheshire WP, Josephs KA, When DLB, PD, and PSP masquerade as MSA: an autopsy study of 134 patients. Neurology. 2015; 85(5): 404– 12. 26138942 PMC4534078
  29. [30]Bastiani M, Cottaar M, Fitzgibbon SP, Suri S, Alfaro-Almagro F, Sotiropoulos SN, Automated quality control for within and between studies diffusion MRI data using a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction. Neuroimage. 2019; 184: 801– 12. 30267859 PMC6264528

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Archer, D. B., Bricker, J. T., Chu, W. T., Burciu, R. G., McCracken, J. L., Lai, S., Coombes, S. A., Fang, R., Barmpoutis, A., Corcos, D. M., Kurani, A. S., Mitchell, T., Black, M. L., Herschel, E., Simuni, T., Parrish, T. B., Comella, C., Xie, T., Seppi, K., Bohnen, N. I., Müller, M. L., Albin, R. L., Krismer, F., Du, G., Lewis, M. M., Huang, X., Li, H., Pasternak, O., McFarland, N. R., Okun, M. S., & Vaillancourt, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Vaillancourt, David E
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
e222-e231
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970186575
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 NS052318, U01 NS102038)
  • Medtronic
  • Parkinson's Foundation (PF-FBS-1778)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (US 62/638,628)
  • Biogen
  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • Sunovion
  • Pfizer
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • Roche
  • Parkinson Alliance
  • National Parkinson Foundation
  • Allergan
  • Merz Pharmaceuticals
  • University of Florida Foundation (R01 NR014852, R01NS096008)
  • International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
  • Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
  • Acorda Therapeutics
  • AbbVie
  • Neurocrine Biosciences
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
  • Mutualité Sociale Agricole
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
parkinsonism, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, atypical parkinsonism, diffusion-weighted imaging, automated image classification, fractional anisotropy, free water, MDS-UPDRS III, non-invasive biomarkers, differential diagnosis, machine learning, white matter tracts
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Austria, Germany, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, United States, Parkinsonian Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review