Cited by 396Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 and artificial intelligence: protecting health-care workers and curbing the spread

Open access
McCall, Becky·2020·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

Confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exceed those of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and, at time of publication, now stand at over 73,435 confirmed cases and over 2000 deaths globally, nearly all in China. By comparison, SARS killed 774 people in 2003, again mostly in China, the epicentre of both outbreaks. Both COVID-19 and SARS spread across continents, infect animals and humans, and use similar mechanics to enter and infect the cell. On the frontline, tactical response to COVID-19 is similar to that of SARS but one major difference exists: in the 17 years since SARS, a powerful new tool has emerged that could potentially be instrumental in keeping this virus within reasonable limits—namely, artificial intelligence (AI).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30054-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital technologies are being harnessed to support the public-health response to COVID-19 worldwide, including population surveillance, case identification, contact tracing, evaluation of interventions using mobility data, and communication with the public.

    “Digital technologies are being harnessed to support the public-health response to COVID-19 worldwide, including population surveillance, case identification, contact tracing and evaluation of interventions on the basis of mobility data and communication with the public.”

    From Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    In “COVID-19 and artificial intelligence: protecting health-care workers and curbing the spread” (page not provided), the paper describes digital outbreak tracking, AI-assisted case identification, contact-tracing systems, and travel data used to predict where cases may appear. It does not describe using mobility data to evaluate interventions or digital technologies to communicate with the public, so those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Digital technologies have been deployed in the COVID-19 pandemic to strengthen each of the four public-health measures: surveillance, rapid case identification, interruption of community transmission and public communication.

    “Similarly, digital technologies also have been deployed in the COVID-19 pandemic 13,14 (Table 1) to strengthen each of the four public-health measures noted above.”

    From Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    In the section “COVID-19 and artificial intelligence: protecting health-care workers and curbing the spread” (page unavailable), McCall describes digital outbreak tracking, AI-assisted rapid identification of possible COVID-19 cases, and models that might inform border checks. The paper does not describe digital technology deployed for public communication, and it presents some transmission-control uses as potential rather than established. It therefore does not support the claim that deployment strengthened each of the four measures. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCall, B.
Corresponding author
McCall, Becky
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
e166-e167
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008401431
Cited by
396
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 107
FWCI
25.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, artificial intelligence, healthcare workers, infection control, SARS, pandemic response, disease spread, zoonotic transmission, viral entry
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review