Proteomic prediction of diverse incident diseases: a machine learning-guided biomarker discovery study using data from a prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Broad-capture proteomic technologies have the potential to improve disease prediction, enabling targeted prevention and management, but studies have so far been limited to very few selected diseases and have not evaluated predictive performance across multiple conditions. We aimed to evaluate the potential of serum proteins to improve risk prediction over and above health-derived information and polygenic risk scores across a diverse set of 24 outcomes. METHODS: We designed multiple case-cohorts nested in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective study, from participants with available serum samples and genome-wide genotype data, with more than 32 974 person-years of follow-up. Participants were middle-aged individuals (aged 40-79 years at baseline) of European ancestry who were recruited from the general population of Norfolk, England, between March, 1993 and December, 1997. We selected participants who developed one of ten less common diseases within 10 years of follow-up; we also subsampled a randomly drawn control subcohort, which also served to investigate 14 more common outcomes (n>70), including all-cause premature mortality (death before the age of 75 years; case numbers 71-437; controls 608-1556). Individuals were excluded from the current study owing to failed genotyping or proteomic quality control, relatedness, or missing information on age, sex, BMI, or smoking status. We used a machine learning framework to derive sparse predictive protein models for the onset of the the 23 individual diseases and all-cause premature mortality, and to derive a single common sparse multimorbidity signature that was predictive across multiple diseases from 2923 serum proteins. FINDINGS: Participants who developed one of ten less common diseases within 10 years of follow-up included 482 women and 507 men, with a mean age at baseline of 64·56 years (8·08). The random subcohort included 990 women and 769 men, with a mean age of 58·79 years (9·31). As few as five proteins alone outperformed polygenic risk scores for 17 of 23 outcomes (median dfference in concordance index [C-index] 0·13 [0·10-0·17]) and improved predictive performance when added over basic patient-derived information models for seven outcomes, achieving a median C-index of 0·82 (IQR 0·77-0·82). This included diseases with poor prognosis such as lung cancer (C-index 0·85 [+/- cross-validation error 0·83-0·87]), for which we identified unreported biomarkers such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 17. A sparse multimorbidity signature of ten proteins improved prediction across seven outcomes over patient-derived information models, achieving performances (median C-index 0·81 [IQR 0·80-0·82]) similar to those of disease-specific signatures. INTERPRETATION: We show the value of broad-capture proteomic biomarker discovery studies across multiple diseases of diverse causes, pointing to those that might benefit the most from proteomic approaches, and the potential to derive common sparse biomarker panels for prediction of multiple diseases at once. This framework could enable follow-up studies to explore the generalisability of proteomic models and to benchmark these against clinical assays, which are required to understand the translational potential of these findings. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, UK Research and Innovation-National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cancer Research UK, and Wellcome Trust.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML algorithms offer enhanced predictive performance over traditional rule-based methods in disease risk prediction.
“Our results align with a growing body of literature indicating that ML algorithms offer enhanced predictive performance over traditional rule-based methods in disease risk prediction [31–34].”
From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The Results (p. 6) report that adding selected proteins improved prediction over patient-information models for seven outcomes. The paper does not compare ML algorithms with traditional rule-based methods, so it does not establish that the algorithm itself caused the improvement or support the claim as a general comparison. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 1 Williams SA, Kivimaki M, Langenberg C, et al. Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health. Nat Med 2019; 25: 1851-57 .
- 2 Torkamani A, Wineinger NE, Topol EJ. The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores. Nat Rev Genet 2018; 19: 581-90.
- 3 Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1876-84.
- 4 Anderson NL. The clinical plasma proteome: a survey of clinical assays for proteins in plasma and serum. Clin Chem 2010; 56: 177-85.
- 5 Zanini JC, Pietzner M, Langenberg C. Integrating genetics and the plasma proteome to predict the risk of type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2020; 20: 60.
- 6 Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002; 1: 845-67 .
- 7 Wu CC, Tsantilas KA, Park J, et al. Mag-Net: Rapid enrichment of membrane-bound particles enables high coverage quantitative analysis of the plasma proteome. bioRxiv 2024; published online April 2. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.10.544439 (preprint). · DOI
- 8 Ferdosi S, Tangeysh B, Brown TR, et al. Engineered nanoparticles enable deep proteomics studies at scale by leveraging tunable nano-bio interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022; 119: e2106053119.
- 9 Messner CB, Demichev V, Wendisch D, et al. Ultra-high-throughput clinical proteomics reveals classifiers of COVID-19 infection. Cell Syst 2020; 11: 11-24.e4.
- 11 Zhong W, Edfors F, Gummesson A, Bergström G, Fagerberg L, Uhlén M. Next generation plasma proteome profiling to monitor health and disease. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 2493.
- 12 Prive F, Arbel J, Vilhjalmsson BJ. LDpred2: better, faster, stronger. Bioinformatics 2020; 36: 5424-31.
- 13 Carrasco-Zanini J, Pietzner M, Lindbohm JV, et al. Proteomic signatures for identification of impaired glucose tolerance. Nat Med 2022; 28: 2293-300.
- 15 Mogensen UB, Ishwaran H, Gerds TA. Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. J Stat Softw 2012; 50: 1-23.
- 16 Walsh I, Fishman D, Garcia-Gasulla D, et al. DOME: recommendations for supervised machine learning validation in biology. Nat Methods 2021; 18: 1122-27 .
- 17 Pietzner M, Stewart ID, Raffler J, et al. Plasma metabolites to profile pathways in noncommunicable disease multimorbidity. Nat Med 2021; 27: 471-79.
- 18 Koprulu M, Carrasco-Zanini J, Wheeler E, et al. Proteogenomic links to human metabolic diseases. Nat Metab 2023; 5: 516-28.
- 20 Hunninghake GM, Cho MH, Tesfaigzi Y, et al. MMP12, lung function, and COPD in high-risk populations. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2599-608.
- 21 Silvestre OM, Nadruz W Jr, Querejeta Roca G, et al. Declining lung function and cardiovascular risk: the ARIC study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 1109-22.
- 22 Burkhardt AM, Maravillas-Montero JL, Carnevale CD, et al. CXCL17 is a major chemotactic factor for lung macrophages. J Immunol 2014; 193: 1468-74.
- 23 Djureinovic D, Pontén V, Landelius P, et al. Multiplex plasma protein profiling identifies novel markers to discriminate patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 741.
- 24 Ohlsson L, Hammarström ML, Lindmark G, Hammarström S, Sitohy B. Ectopic expression of the chemokine CXCL17 in colon cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2016; 114: 697-703.
- 25 Choreño-Parra JA, Jiménez-Álvarez LA, Ramírez-Martínez G, et al. CXCL17 Is a specific diagnostic biomarker for severe pandemic influenza A(H1N1) that predicts poor clinical outcome. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 633297 .
- 26 McCoy IE, Hsu JY, Bonventre JV, et al. Acute kidney injury associates with long-term increases in plasma TNFR1, TNFR2, and KIM-1: findings from the CRIC Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33: 1173-81.
- 27 Albanes D, Alcala K, Alcala N, et al. The blood proteome of imminent lung cancer diagnosis. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 3042.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, Y., Chen, Z., Tang, Z., Qin, Y., & Wang, F. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-23858-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carrasco-Zanini, J., Pietzner, M., Koprulu, M., Wheeler, E., Kerrison, N. D., Wareham, N. J., & Langenberg, C.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Langenberg, Claudia
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Digital Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e470-e479
- ISSN
- 2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399832694
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- UKRI (MR/V033867/1)
- Wellcome Trust
- Cancer Research UK (C864/A14136)
- Medical Research Council (MR/N003284/1, MC_UU_00006/1, MC_PC_21036, G107794)
- HDR UK
- Gates Cambridge Trust
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- serum proteomics, disease prediction, serum proteins, biomarker discovery, polygenic risk score, multimorbidity, EPIC-Norfolk cohort, machine learning, risk prediction, middle-aged adults, European ancestry, rare diseases, common diseases, concordance index
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Risk Assessment, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review