Misconceptions (2): turnover is always higher in cancellous than in cortical bone
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If bone turnover is 10%/year, then the mean lifetime of each moiety of bone is 10 years.
“If bone turnover is 10%/year, then the mean lifetime of each moiety of bone is 10 years”.”
From Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 299
- Authors
- Parfitt, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parfitt, A.M.
- Venue
- Bone
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 807-809
- ISSN
- 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-3282
- OpenAlex
- W2110174785
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bone (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Keywords
- bone turnover, trabecular bone, cortical bone, bone remodeling, bone metabolism, bone turnover rate
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Bone and Bones, Female, Humans, Bone Density, Bone Remodeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review