Expression of connective tissue growth factor/hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24 (CTGF/Hcs24) during fracture healing
Abstract
Localization and expression of connective tissue growth factor/hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24 (CTGF/Hcs24) during fracture healing in mouse ribs were investigated. In situ hybridization demonstrated that CTGF/Hcs24 mRNA was remarkably expressed, especially in hypertrophic chondrocytes and proliferating chondrocytes, in the regions of regenerating cartilage on days 8 and 14 after fracture. CTGF/Hcs24 mRNA was also expressed in proliferating periosteal cells in the vicinity of the fracture sites on days 2 and 8, and in cells in fibrous tissue around the callus on day 8. Northern blot analysis showed that expression of CTGF/Hcs24 mRNA was 3.9 times higher on day 2 of fracture healing than that on day 0. On day 8, it reached a peak of 8.6 times higher than that on day 0. It then declined to a lower level. Immunostaining showed that CTGF/Hcs24 was localized in hypertrophic chondrocytes and proliferating chondrocytes in the regions of regenerating cartilage, and in active osteoblasts in the regions of intramembranous ossification. Although CTGF/Hcs24 was abundant in the proliferating and differentiating cells (on days 8 and 14), immunostaining decreased as the cells differentiated to form bone (on day 20). CTGF/Hcs24 was also detected in cells in fibrous tissue, vascular endothelial cells in the callus, and periosteal cells around the fracture sites. These results suggest that CTGF/Hcs24 plays some role in fracture healing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CCN1 expression is elevated in long bones during fracture repair, notably in proliferating chondrocytes and osteoblasts.
“In addition to cutaneous wound healing, CCN1 expression is elevated in remodeling cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarctions [24], in vascular injury [56], and in the long bones during fracture repair, notably in proliferating chondrocytes and osteoblasts [127,128].”
From CCN1/CYR61: the very model of a modern matricellular protein (2011) · cites this paper as [128]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Nakata, E., Nakanishi, T., Kawai, A., Asaumi, K., Yamaai, T., Asano, M., Nishida, T., Mitani, S., Inoue, H., & Takigawa, M.
- Affiliations
- Okayama University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takigawa, M
- Venue
- Bone
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-447
- ISSN
- 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-3282
- OpenAlex
- W1964916553
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bone (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-RFTF98100201)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Naito Foundation
- Sumitomo Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connective Tissue Growth Factor Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Keywords
- connective tissue growth factor, fracture healing, hypertrophic chondrocytes, chondrocyte proliferation, periosteal cells, intramembranous ossification, osteoblasts, callus, vascular endothelial cells, rib fractures, gene expression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Northern, DNA Probes, Fracture Healing, In Situ Hybridization, Immediate-Early Proteins, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Connective Tissue Growth Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review