The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Doublespeak Populism” and Public Administration: The Case of Mexico
Abstract
This chapter discusses how the Mexican public administration is being affected by a backsliding process triggered by the current government of Andrés Manuel López Obrador. It argues that Mexico is experiencing a case of what could labelled “doublespeak populism,” which is transforming in profound ways the country’s public administration. López Obrador’s agenda has been embedded in terms and phrases traditionally associated with the political left, but his policy measures actually reflect topics closer to the right. Moreover, these measures have been introduced whilst deliberately concealing their ultimate intentions and potential effects. As a result, López Obrador’s reforms have further deteriorated bureaucratic institutions and public services, thus affecting the overall welfare and basic rights of the people they are supposed to help. The chapter draws on policy proposals, presidential speeches, analyses from academics and policy experts, and news reports to assess the broader administrative consequences of López Obrador’s doublespeak populism on Mexico’s democratic governance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This led to the weakening of autonomous agencies and the centralization of authority within the executive branch”
From Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule (2025) · cites this paper as Dussauge- Laguna 2021
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding
Bauer, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2023.2243400 · Cited by 104
“…2014; Kovacs & Hajnal, 2017); and the emergence of populist governments in other democratic countries like Brazil, Mexico, Poland, added up to a worrisome trend in need of further investigation (Coppedge, 2017; Dussauge-Laguna, 2021; Mazur, 2021; Morais de Sá e Silva, 2022; Pereira, 2022).”
Bauer, M. W. (2025) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70028 · Cited by 19
“This led to the weakening of autonomous agencies and the centralization of authority within the executive branch (Dussauge-Laguna 2021).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dussauge-Laguna, M. I.
- Venue
- Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2021-08-31
- Pages
- 178-199
- OpenAlex
- W3194972723
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 39.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Policy and Governance
- Keywords
- public administration, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Mexican government, backsliding, democratic governance, bureaucratic institutions, public services, political rhetoric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review