Hyperbolic Geometry
Abstract
1. Introduction Hyperbolic geometry was created in the first half of the nineteenth century in the midst of attempts to understand Euclid's axiomatic basis for geometry. It is one type of non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a geometry that discards one of Euclid's axioms. Einstein and Minkowski found in non-Euclidean geometry a geometric basis for the understanding of physical time and space. In the early part of the twentieth century every serious student of mathematics and physics studied non-Euclidean geometry. This has not been true of the mathematicians and physicists of our generation. Nevertheless with the passage of time it has become more and more apparent that the negatively curved geometries, of which hyperbolic non-Euclidean geometry is the prototype, are the generic forms of geometry. They have profound applications to the study of complex variables, to the topology of two- and three-dimensional manifolds, to the study of finitely presented infinite groups, to physics, and to other disparate fields of mathematics. A working knowledge of hyperbolic geometry has become a prerequisite for workers in these fields. These notes are intended as a relatively quick introduction to hyperbolic geometry. They review the wonderful history of non-Euclidean geometry. They give five different analytic models for and several combinatorial approximations to non-Euclidean geometry by means of which the reader can develop an intuition for the behavior of this geometry. They develop a n…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The hyperbolic space has five models which are isometric to each other and conformal to the Euclidean space.
“The hyperbolic space has five models which are often insightful to work in. They are isometric to each other and conformal to the Euclidean space (Cannon et al., 1997; Parkkonen, 2013) 4 .”
From Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddings (2018) · cites this paper as Cannon et al., 1997
The hyperbolic space of dimension n ≥ 2 is uniquely characterized as a complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with constant negative curvature.
“It is (up to isometry) uniquely characterized as a complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with constant negative curvature (Cannon et al., 1997).”
From Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddings (2018) · cites this paper as Cannon et al., 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddings
Ganea, O.-E., Bécigneul, G., & Hofmann, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.01882 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cannon, J. W., Floyd, W. J., Kenyon, R., & Parry, W. R.
- Venue
- Flavors of Geometry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1997-09-28
- Pages
- 59-116
- OpenAlex
- W4411679512
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Keywords
- hyperbolic geometry, non-Euclidean geometry, combinatorial approximation, topology of manifolds, group theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review