The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life
Abstract
The study of metaphor is now firmly established as a central topic within cognitive science and the humanities. We marvel at the creative dexterity of gifted speakers and writers for their special talents in both thinking about certain ideas in new ways, and communicating these thoughts in vivid, poetic forms. Yet metaphors may not only be special communicative devices, but a fundamental part of everyday cognition in the form of 'conceptual metaphors'. An enormous body of empirical evidence from cognitive linguistics and related disciplines has emerged detailing how conceptual metaphors underlie significant aspects of language, thought, cultural and expressive action. Despite its influence and popularity, there have been major criticisms of conceptual metaphor. This book offers an evaluation of the arguments and empirical evidence for and against conceptual metaphors, much of which scholars on both sides of the wars fail to properly acknowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162548 · Cited by 1,429
Cited by
“Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19
Semino, E. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989 · Cited by 412
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
(2013) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac · Cited by 294
Poetic Metaphors: Creativity and interpretation
Rasse, C. (2022) · Figurative Thought and Language · doi:10.1075/ftl.15 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, Jr.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4240385529
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781107762350
- The paper
- Gibbs, Jr. (2018). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.