In and Out of the Stoa: Diogenes Laertius on Zeno
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zeno left quite a bit of room for development here for his successors and wrote relatively little on natural philosophy.
“However, it does seem plain that Zeno left quite a bit of room for development here for his successors and wrote relatively little on natural philosophy.”
From A Note on Cleanthes and Early Stoic Cosmogony (2020) · cites this paper as Long 2018
Cites
The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism
(2009) · doi:10.1017/ccol9780521873475 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Note on Cleanthes and Early Stoic Cosmogony
Harriman, B. (2020) · Mnemosyne · doi:10.1163/1568525x-12342771 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Long, A. A.
- Corresponding author
- Long, A. A.
- ORCID
- Long, A. A.
- Venue
- Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-09-07
- Pages
- 242-262
- OpenAlex
- W3164555209
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Diogenes Laertius, Zeno of Citium, Stoicism, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, ancient biography, cynicism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review