Cited by 5Classical Philosophy and ThoughtClassical Antiquity StudiesClassical Studies and Philology

In and Out of the Stoa: Diogenes Laertius on Zeno

Long, A. A.·2018·Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108186650.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zeno left quite a bit of room for development here for his successors and wrote relatively little on natural philosophy.

    “However, it does seem plain that Zeno left quite a bit of room for development here for his successors and wrote relatively little on natural philosophy.”

    From A Note on Cleanthes and Early Stoic Cosmogony (2020) · cites this paper as Long 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, A. A.
Corresponding author
Long, A. A.
Venue
Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy
Published
2018-09-07
Pages
242-262
OpenAlex
W3164555209
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Diogenes Laertius, Zeno of Citium, Stoicism, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, ancient biography, cynicism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review