The DOI matches its Crossref record; 444 of the 499 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Cosmic Spiritualism among the Pythagoreans, Stoics, Jews and Early Christians
Open accessAbstract
This chapter traces a genealogy of pneumatic cosmology, covering the Pythagoreans of the fifth century BCE, the Stoics of the third and second centuries BCE, the Jews writing in Alexandria in the first century BCE and the Christians of the first century CE. Starting from the early Pythagoreans, ‘breath’ and ‘breathing’ function to draw analogies between cosmogony and anthropogony – a notion ultimately rejected by Plato in the Timaeus and Aristotle in his cosmological works, but taken up by the Posidonius and expanded into a rich and challenging corporeal metaphysics. Similarly, the Post-Hellenistic philosopher and biblical exegete Philo of Alexandria approaches the cosmogony and anthropogony described in Genesis (1:1-3 and 1:7) through Platonist-Stoic philosophy, in his attempt to provide a philosophically rigorous explanation for why Moses employed certain terms or phrases when writing his book of creation. Finally, the chapter sees a determined shift in the direction of rejecting pneumatic cosmology for a revised pneumatic anthropogony in the writings of the New Testament: by appeal to the ‘Holy Spirit’ (πνεῦμα ἅγιον), early Christians effectively adapted the Stoic metaphysics of ‘breath’, with its notions of divine intelligence and bonding, to the ecclesiastical project of building a Christian community conceived of as the ‘body of Christ’.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This chapter traces how ancient notions of πνεῦμα (breath/spirit) moved from Pythagorean cosmic respiration through Stoic physics and Philo’s biblical exegesis into early Christian pneumatology. It argues that New Testament writers, especially Paul, transformed pagan and Hellenic Jewish cosmic spiritualism into a community-constituting Holy Spirit.
Key findings
- Early Pythagoreans treated the cosmos as a living, breathing entity: it draws in breath/void from the infinite, and this void differentiates the natures and spaces of things. The chapter presents this as an early biomorphic analogy for cosmic order.
- Stoics and Posidonius recast breath as corporeal, hot matter that sustains bodies through tension (συντονία) and tenor (ἕξις/τόνος); the cosmos is unified by reciprocal breathing, while void is incorporeal and outside the ordered world.
- Philo of Alexandria combined Stoic/Platonic ideas with Genesis exegesis: God breathes into the human intellect, breath mediates divine power, and a hierarchy runs from God to the rational soul to the irrational part. This makes knowledge of God possible for humans, unlike other animals.
- In the New Testament, especially 1 Corinthians, Paul uses pneumatic concepts to describe the Holy Spirit as both unifying and differentiating the Christian body. Paul rereads Genesis 2:7 so that the first Adam is animate and the last Adam becomes a life-giving spirit; John’s Gospel presents the kosmos as unable to receive the Spirit of Truth, and Revelation envisions a New Jerusalem constituted by the Spirit.
Methods
- Design: conceptual and intellectual-historical genealogy of πνεῦμα across Pythagorean, Stoic, Hellenic Jewish, and early Christian traditions.
- Data/sample: ancient testimonia and fragments, including Aristotle, Simplicius, Philolaus, Diogenes Laertius, Posidonius, Nemesius, Galen, Philo, the Septuagint Genesis, and New Testament texts such as Matthew, Luke, John, Acts, 1 Corinthians, and Revelation.
- Analysis: close reading and comparative exegesis of philosophical and biblical passages, tracking terminological continuities and adaptations rather than quantitative evidence.
Limitations
- The chapter states that evidence for early Pythagoreanism is late and biased, that the Aristotelian source text is difficult to establish, and that the exact Pythagorean conception of void may be impossible to adjudicate.
- It also states that a full analysis of Philo’s exegesis would require more space, that some details about Chrysippus and compound bodies remain conjectural, and that it is doubtful Posidonius placed the “outside” in the infinite void beyond the cosmos.
- Evident from the text: the argument is interpretive and selective, focusing on representative passages rather than an exhaustive survey of all New Testament or ancient sources, and it offers no quantitative data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“Perhaps the very earliest evidence in the Western world of 'breath/spirit' (Greek πνεῦμα) occupying a formative place in both cosmic and human generation is associated with the enigmatic philosopher Pythagoras of Samos, who died in the first few decades of the fifth century bce. 10”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What is not often noted, however, is that much of the pneumatic theology that is found in the New Testament, which would come to exercise a tremendous effect on the world after Christianity's triumph in the Late Roman Empire, shows remarkable inheritances also from the secularising, scientific tradition of the Greek philosophical cosmology.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sign that the universe and its constituents are properly differentiated from what is chaotic and disorderly is the persistent motion indicated by regular respiration.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For, as I will argue in this chapter, it is with Paul that we see not only the bridging of the Hebrew and Indo-European traditions of cosmogonic and anthropogonic pneumaticsthat had already been anticipated by his predecessor Philo of Alexandria, a Hellenic Jew who was additionally a Platonist/Stoic philosopherbut also a subsuming of the scientific tradition under a notion of divine pneumatics”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The vehicle for this differentiation is void, or the space that is occupied by matter, and that is like 'breath'.13”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is with Paul that we see not only the bridging of the Hebrew and Indo-European traditions of cosmogonic and anthropogonic pneumaticsthat had already been anticipated by his predecessor Philo of Alexandria, a Hellenic Jew who was additionally a Platonist/Stoic philosopher”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but also a subsuming of the scientific tradition under a notion of divine pneumatics that has an active role in religious teaching, understanding and even prophetics.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“But with the advent of Pythagorean philosophy in Greece 16 something had changed: the kosmos itself, understood in speculatively biomorphic terms, was now being associated with a unified, living being, whose self-constitution was regulated through its primal activity of breathing.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way, soul, as hot breath, manifests a sort of 'tension' between things that brings coherence and cohesion between what is internal and what is external:”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“One major difference between Hellenistic and Post-Hellenistic intellectual cultures and philosophy is the formal emergence of an exegetical habit.46”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 55
- Probably not a substantial claim. 42
In the paper
“It is agreed that πνεῦμα, which normally translates as 'breath' but eventually comes to mean 'spirit' in a marked sense, plays a fundamental role in the latter tradition, marking the filial inheritance of early Christianity from Judaism and setting out a new path of spiritual cosmologya return of Man to the paternal source that had originally bestowed upon him life.8”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For the early Pythagoreans, the universe is understood to function, to live, as an animalonce it has been constituted and its parts set into motion, it inhales and exhales 'breath' from the infinity that surrounds it (perhaps explaining, by analogy, the expansion and contraction of the ordered universe), and from which it differentiates itself and its individual natures.12”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hence, we see that the Homeric gods breathe: in particular, they 'breathe into' humans certain insightstheir breathing is a kind of divine gift or guidance, not at all indicative of their mortality, but rather the mark of their immortality.15”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The Pythagoreans, too, held that void exists and that it enters the heaven from the infinite breath, the kosmos inhaling also the void which distinguishes the natures of things as if it were what separates and distinguishes the terms of a series.”
- Also stated in: § 13.2 Origins of Cosmic Breathing: The Pythagoreans · plain
“They [the Pythagoreans] used to say that the void penetrates the kosmos, as if the latter inhaled it or exhaled it like a breath of what is diffused around it from the outside.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Aristotle, Physics 4.6.213b22-6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle's Physics p. 651.39-41Diels
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 13.2 Origins of Cosmic Breathing: The Pythagoreans · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the major contribution to the history of cosmogonic and anthropogonic breath made by Philo is the adaptation of the Stoic metaphysics into a unique epistemological and ethical system: in his exegesis of the anthropogony in Genesis, Philo finds the grounds for differentiation of human and other animal intellective capacities, rooted in a notion of the divine gift of breath.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of more relevance to our study of the Stoics, in the case of biology, Aristotle uses 'tension' (συντονία) to describe the quality of the sinews that connect the parts of animal bodies.In animals at their prime, the joints and sinews are more tense, whereas both prior and posterior to that age, they are more slack.36”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is implied that since Moses does not mention God 'in-breathing' into other animals, they in fact lack higher intellectual capacities and cannot know God.57”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Outside this [sc.the kosmos] is diffused the unlimited void, which is incorporeal.By 'incorporeal' they mean that which, although it is capable of being occupied by corporeal things, is not occupied by them.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posidonius of Apamea Fr. 8 Kidd = Diogenes Laertius 7.140
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For 'breath', as we saw, is the rarified matter or stuff that, when qualified as 'hot', 31 actively constitutes soul, which itself makes sure that bodies remain unified as such (and identifiable as what-they-are).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This makes some sense, at least in accordance with the Stoics' unique conceptualisation of internal breathing as 'tenor', i.e. the breathing that guarantees an individual corporeal object's existence as such.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Importantly, for Posidonius, as for earlier Stoics, the soul is defined as a 'hot breath' (πνεῦμα ἔνθερμον) and is matter, and it is soul that is said to 'hold together' bodies, 'just as glue controls both itself and what is outside' (ὥσπερ καὶ ἡ κόλλα καὶ ἑαυτὴν καὶ τὰ ἐκτὸς κρατεῖ).25”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hence, so Aristotle argues, animals in their prime, when their sinews and joints are most 'tense', are strongest, and he gives as evidence for this mature bulls, who, according to him, have particularly sinewy hearts, which, thanks to the high tension in their flesh, produce the tense breathing that one observes when a bull breathes.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Arist.GA 5.7.787b6-19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we saw earlier, this 'zetetic' genre tended to produce, for analysis, a single lemma of a wisdom-text and attempt to 'explain' it by appeal to lexical, philosophical, or ethical principles:”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The pneumatic cosmogony of Genesis is remarkable for its divergence from the Pythagorean tradition discussed earlier: for the Pythagoreans, it is the kosmos itself that first breathes in, whereas Genesis has God acting as a sort of prime breather in the process of differentiating the parts of the kosmos.52”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The metaphor employed by the Stoics for this aspect of 'breath' is both musical and biological: in Aristotle, it refers to the kinds of harmonic concords that are high-pitched, 34 but it is not a simple metaphor for psychic or political 'harmony'.35”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are two kinds of innate breath, the physical kind [τὸ φυσικόν] and the animate kind [τὸ ψυχικόν].Some people [sc. the Stoics] also posit a third, the tenor kind [τὸ ἑκτικόν].The breath which sustains stones is of the tenor kind, the one which nurtures animals and plants the physical, and the animate breath is that which, in animate beings, makes animals capable of 39”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the repetition of the phrase 'from the Holy Spirit' (ἐκ πνεύματος ἁγίου) with regard to Mary's pregnancy and Jesus' conception indicates its importance, and we are invited to wonder about the precise inflection of 'out of' or 'from' (ἐκ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we saw earlier, 'tension' occurs between bodies within a complex 'system', whereas 'tenor' is within an individual body as such.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was adopted by the remarkable secondcentury bce philosopher Posidonius of Apamea, whose investigations into nature reflected a particular declension of Stoicism: 23”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“There is no void in the kosmos, but it is wholly unified.For this [sc.unification] necessarily results from reciprocal breathing and tension of the heavenly things towards the terrestrial things [τοῦτο γὰρ ἀναγκάζειν τὴν τῶν οὐρανίων πρὸς τὰ ἐπίγεια σύμπνοιαν καὶ συντονίαν].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Posidonius of Apamea Fr. 8 Kidd = Diogenes Laertius 7.140
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“'Tension' could be understood as the means by which diverse objects are able to interact successfully.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Contrariwise, the inwards breathing of an animal is what guarantees its unity, its identifiability as an individual substantial bodythis animal; 40 in the absence of breath, the individual substance no longer exists, and this is the animal's 'death'.41”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] source
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“'Tension' thus understood appears to be a force that marks the optimal physical conditions for systemwide performance, and hence it is no surprise that Posidonius, as a committed teleologist, adapted Aristotle's biological usage to his pneumatic cosmology.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This genre presupposes a surplus of meaning in the wisdom-text that goes beyond mere literal interpretation, and it exhibits a deeply embedded commitment to teleology and epistemological positivism: because God's word, transmitted through his medium Moses, is perfect, it is the exegete's responsibility to employ his capacities to unpack what it was that God meant, i.e. why he said it.50”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [50] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Human beings are capable of obtaining knowledge (or at least justified true belief) about what God said or the prophets wrote.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For it implies of necessity three things: that which in-breathes, that which receives, that which is inbreathed: that which in-breathes is God [τὸ ἐμπνέον ἐστὶν ὁ θεός], that which receives is the intellect [τὸ δεχόμενον ὁ νοῦς], that which is inbreathed is breath [τὸ ἐμπνεόμενον τὸ πνεῦμα].”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Void as such does not exist in the kosmos, but rather the persistent 'reciprocal breathing' (σύμπνοια) and 'tension' (συντονία) of the heavenly towards the earthly things indicates that all space within the ordered universe is, at all times, occupied by corporeal matter.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the writings of the New Testament, we see emerge a somewhat haphazard, but nevertheless deeply informed, cosmic theology of 'breath/ spirit' (πνεῦμα): it shares much in common with Philo's exegesis of divine 'breath' across the works we have surveyed in brief, including, as we will see, a similar ideation of what I am calling 'consubstantiation', and it also demonstrates a kind of parallelism”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Greek word πνεῦμα means both 'breath' and 'spirit'.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, God's capacityfoot_26 imparts breath to both the human's intellect and to the irrational part of his soul, but his agencyhis direct engagement as efficient cause, so to sayonly happens with the intellect.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“'Tensile movement' goes both outwards and inwards: the outwards breathing of, say, an animal is the power that producesor more literally 'brings to completion' (ἀποτελεστική)qualities and quantities, which we can perceive in one another: hence, we might say that Aristotle's bull is 'swollen with anger' when we perceive the bull's exhalation.39”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Posidonius's strict commitment to materialism within the ordered universe reveals itself in the claim that soul, as hot breath, is qualified matter, unlike the breath of the Pythagorean cosmogony, which was immaterial and described even as the void.29”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At a higher level, the species of 'breath' that provides nutrition for growth is reserved from wise animals, unwise animals and plants, is 'physical' or 'natural'; stones and metals do not possess it.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Posidonius adapts the Pythagorean cosmogony to a Stoic framework, elaborating a more complex theory of corporeals (i.e.bodies, or threedimensional material objects) and incorporeals (i.e.empty space) according to the principle of potentiality: void is incorporeal, i.e. a space that could be occupied by corporeals, but currently is not.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This represents an expansion of a genre of scientific literature that is often considered to have originated with the writings of Aristotle on Homer, and one might refer to this sort of scientific literature as 'zetetic', after the title of a lost work that comes down to us (the Homeric Zetemata, or, more colloquially, the Homeric Questions).47”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The same could be said, we would imagine, of all individual compound animate substances, whether they are animals of lower epistemic and aretaic capacities such as Aristotle's bull, or sages who possess full rational capacities, like Socrates.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The imprimatur for approaching the formation of the macrocosm (i.e. the universe) and the microcosm (i.e. the human being) for Jewish and Christian authors was the first chapter of Genesis, which expressly presented a pneumatic cosmogony:”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Posidonius' account of breath as 'tension' taps firmly into Stoic orthodoxy.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prior to the dissolution of the philosophical schools in Athens in the 80s bce, we have little direct evidence of dedicated exegetical practice with regard to what we might consider 'wisdom-texts', ranging from Homer and the Hebrew Bible to Plato's dialogues.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Perhaps at this point it is worth pointing out that, for Posidonius, the kosmos was defined as the 'systematic compound composed out of heaven, earth, and the natural constituents in them' (σύστημα ἐξ οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς καὶ τῶν ἐν τούτοις φύσεων).28”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the Platonist and Stoic schools, however, works that seek to explain what meanings, concepts, themes, and systems of ethics underlie wisdom-texts become codified into recognisable genres, and thus is born what is often generally understood to be the 'commentary tradition'.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, Philo follows the other Stoics in seeing breath as what constitutes a 'unity' (ἕνωσις) or synthesis of corporeal objects relative to one another, and that this unity signifies the conferral of the divine power that 'extends' (τείναντος) from God to Adam, the 'earthly man'.55”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One step up is the kind of breath that animate objects, wise or unwise, possess: Galen calls it 'animate', or related to 'soul' traditionally understood as lifeforce that is manifest through sense perception.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The language used suggests that he is referring to the breath as 'tension' (συντονία) between objects in the kosmos.56”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Pythagoreans' pneumatic cosmogony was generally ignored by fourth-century bce philosophers, perhaps due to the authoritative cosmogonic visions that were presented by Plato and Aristotle.21”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Philo sets up a strict hierarchy of 'in-breathing', related to the animation of the many parts that make up the first human being: God breathes into the intellective part of the soul the activity of reasoning, whereas the intellective part of the soul passes on what it has of the divine pneumatic power to the lower, irrational part of the soul.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All this is an expression of the heaven and earth that are revealed after the final Judgement, New Heaven and New Earth (Revelation 21:1), where there will be no more darkness of night, banished by the light that is God diffused throughout New Jerusalem (Revelation 22:5)a second banishment of the darkness of the void from Genesis.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Speaking to the apostle Philip in the Gospel of John, Jesus promises to intercede on behalf of his followers and request from His Father an intercessor, to act on their behalf:”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Holy Spirit becomes the vehicle for the transmission of God's power from generation to generation, thus constituting and sustaining the Christian community over time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While conceptualisations of the kosmos have remained static, for the most part, the notion of 'breath' has expanded and become more comprehensive as we have proceeded through the Hellenistic to the Post-Hellenistic world.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, in the Gospel of John, we witness the ultimate rejection of the pagan spiritual cosmologieswith all their metaphysical and physical entailmentsof the Pythagoreans, Stoics, and Hellenic Jews, and their replacement with the eternal community of Christian believers, unified through the Holy Spirit, and not limited by this kosmos.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I would suggest this colloquial, non-philosophical usage is the best for this passage.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The Gospel of Matthew's context includes Jesus' potentially dubious parentage.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these important connections, no revolution in spiritual cosmology in the Greco-Roman world can be said to be greater than what occurred among the Early Christians.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is true, as Engberg-Pederson has argued impressively by reference to this passage, that Paul is employing Stoic terms and concepts, reflecting his intellectual environs and reacting to Philonic exegesis.72”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Engberg-Pederson 2010: 26-31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“As far as Paul's ethics of belief go, we should note that, for Engberg-Pederson, πνεῦμα 'is stated to be responsible for certain states of mind, namely mental attitudes, in fact for nothing other than the virtues in the Greek philosophical tradition'.76”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Engberg-Pederson 2000: 160
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cosmic and human pneumatic analogies have been rejected and replaced with a new sense of the Spirit of Truth (τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας), which the kosmos is unable to admit due to its insufficiency.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, there is the idea that the Holy Spirit, like Philo's divine breath, possesses its own inherent power but transmits its information through intermediary vessels, in this case the Apostles.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the end, it is the Christian kosmopolis, heralded by the Holy Spirit, that manifests a new vision of the kosmos of Greek philosophy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One suspects that 'breath' (πνοή) in this circumstance is not the same thing as the Holy Spirit, but simply the breath of life.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In tracing a particular genealogy of spiritual cosmologies from the early Pythagoreans of the fifth century bce to the writers of the New Testament in the mid to late first century ce, we have examined how various notions of 'breath' (πνεῦμα) have informed the description of the ordered world (κόσμος).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a relatively consistent pattern here: a chain of disciples is established, and the passing of divine breath on from disciple to disciple, in the form of the Holy Spirit, reveals itself as the perpetual re-enactment of the original divine activities of in-breathing of both Adam and Jesus.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The semantics here make it sound like the impregnation is a kind of physical invasion, a sort of 'climbing upon' Mary, perhaps recalling God's breath being borne upon the water (πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος) in the primal cosmogonic act of Genesis.63”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is neither the biomorphic kosmos of the Pythagoreans, nor the intelligent kosmos of the Stoics: this kosmos is wholly bereft of the Spirit of Truth, which functions here as the eternal guarantor of co-presence with Jesus.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for Paul, the 'last' or heavenly Adam is Christ, the 'life-giving Spirit' (πνεῦμα ζῳοποιοῦν) that constitutes the spiritual body of the community of Christians, whereas the terrestrial Adam is the figure whom God created on the sixth day, the 'man of dust'.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, for Paul, the Holy Spirit not only unites all the parts of the 'body of Christ'; it also differentiates what sorts of activities each person is best suited to do, according to the will of the Holy Spirit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Speaking in Acts (17:24-25) of the 'kosmos and everything in it' (ὁ κόσμος καὶ πάντα τὰ ἐν αὐτῷ) that God created, Paul asserts that God has no need of human works because it is He himself who has given to humans 'life, and breath, and all things' (ἀυτὸς διδοὺς πᾶσι ζωὴν καὶ πνοὴν καὶ τὰ πάντα).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The transition from Jesus to Stephen as 'recipient' serves to highlight the transitional power of the divine breath: just as Jesus receives the Holy Spirit from God the Father, so too Stephen receives it from Jesus the Son.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is initially unclear whether the author of the Gospel of Matthew is ascribing any agency to the Holy Spirit: it may seem that the Holy Spirit is the stuff or material out of which the impregnation and conception occurs, or that the Holy Spirit is the instrument that makes it possible for impregnation and conception.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consubstantiation within the Christian community now goes beyond Philo's Stoic trinity of 'God, Adam, Breath', or the Gospels' 'Father, Son, Holy Spirit': it reaches across the entire body of Christ's followers, from the death and rebirth of the 'last Adam' until the final return after the Judgement.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This place is what John of Patmos calls the 'holy city' (ἡ πόλις ἁγίη): it is constituted through the binding of the Holy Spirit to the bride and presented as a place of unity for those who have heeded the words of prophesy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As Engberg-Pederson has argued in speaking about Paul's spiritualism, 'pneuma . . . is an entity that is primarily connected with being in the group.It highlights a certain stable state of the believer.'75”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Engberg-Pederson 2000: 158
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In doing so, he establishes the theological foundations of Christianity with characteristic aplomb, reconstructing it out of the scattered and even perhaps eclectic material that constituted Hellenic Jews' unique blend of Platonist metaphysics, Stoic physics and Jewish biblical exegesis.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It also motivates prophesy and inspires teaching (Luke 1:67; Luke 4:14).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas the Pythagorean kosmos obtained its birth from an act of breathing in the external void, and the Stoic kosmos persisted uniquely through the reciprocal activities of respiration, the kosmos as described by John is blind and deaf to the Spirit of Truth, neither recognising it nor contemplating it.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in 1 Corinthians 12, a short digression entitled 'On the Spiritual [Gifts]' (Περὶ τῶν πνευματικῶν), 70 Paul develops an elaborate description of how the Holy Spirit unifies the community under Christ:”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“As Troels Engberg-Pederson has noted extensively, the work of Paul that most effectively situates his thought in a broader philosophical present is 1 Corinthians.69”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Engberg-Pederson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Elsewhere in Acts, the Holy Spirit becomes the primary medium for the transmission of Jesus' teachings, and even the catalyst for speaking prophesy among the disciples themselves.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It itself acts as a teacher and, even, an advocate for Jesus after his death, transmitting his words posthumously (John 14:15-26 and 16:13-15).65”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the Holy Spirit also appears to be responsible for impregnating Elisabeth with John the Baptist, if this is what is meant by referring to her as 'filled up' (ἐπλήσθη πνεύματος ἁγίου) with it (Luke 1:41-43).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We are meant to understand that the Holy Spirit, wed to its 'bride', the city of New Jerusalem (Revelation 21:2, 21:9), calls those who have heeded the words of John's book.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Human beings are capable of obtaining knowledge (or at least justified true belief) about what God said or the prophets wrote.
“Implicit is the assumption that human beings are capable of obtaining knowledge (or at least justified true belief) about what God said or the prophets wrote.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Greek word πνεῦμα means both 'breath' and 'spirit'.
“It is important to note from the beginning that the word for 'breath' and 'spirit' is the same in Greek: πνεῦμα.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Gospel of Matthew's context includes Jesus' potentially dubious parentage.
“given the context here of Jesus' potentially dubious parentage”
Citations
Cites
Deleuze, G. (1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1461 · Cited by 6,722
Dis-agreement : politics and philosophy
Rancière, J., & Rose, J. (1998) · Cited by 3,479
Lakoff, G. P., & Turner, M. (1989) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 · Cited by 2,962
THE POLITICS OF AESTHETICS: THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE SENSIBLE
Walker, J. A. (2005) · The Art Book · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8357.2005.00570.x · Cited by 2,389
The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation
Aristotle, J., Barnes, J. A., Smith, W., & Ross (1984) · Princeton University Press eBooks · Cited by 2,382
Kövecses, Z. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614408 · Cited by 1,769
Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165907 · Cited by 1,698
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. B. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813375 · Cited by 1,686
The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895555 · Cited by 1,347
Derrida, J., Bennington, G., & McLeod, I. (1987) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226807690.001.0001 · Cited by 1,070
Flagged first, then by citations
55 of the 499 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 242
- Zeitlin, F. I. 1994. ‘The Artful Eye: Vision, Ecphrasis and Spectacle in Euripidean Theatre’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), pp. 138–96.
- Yourcenar, 1979, La Couronne et la Lyre. Poèmes
- Wright, 2000, Reason and Necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus
- Woodruff, 1982, Plato, Hippias Major
- Zanini, 2012, Horizonterweiterung durch Perspektivenwechsel: das Somnium Scipionis, AU, 55, 40
- Wiesehöfer, J. 2004. ‘Daiukku, Deiokes und die medische Reichsbildung’, in Meier, M., Patzek, B., Walter, U. and Wiesehöfer, J. (eds.), pp. 15–26.
- White, J. 2008. ‘Paul’s Cosmology: The Witness of Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, and Galatians’, in Pennington, J. T. and McDonough, S. M. (eds.), pp. 90–106.
- Weinstock, 1932, Templum, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung, 47, 95
- Walter, U. 2004. ‘“Da sah er das Volk ganz in seiner Hand” – Deiokes und die Entstehung monarchischer Herrschaft im Geschichtswerk Herodots’, in Meier, M., Patzek, B., Walter, U. and Wiesehöfer, J. (eds.), pp. 75–95.
- von Freeden, 1983, ΟΙΚΙΑ ΚΥΡΡHΣΤΟΥ. Studien zum sogenannten Turm der Winde in Athen
- Thomas, C. J. 2010. ‘Plato’, in O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C. (eds.), pp. 429–48.
- Taub, 2003, Ancient Meteorology
- Tarrant, 1976, Seneca: Agamemnon
- Szlezák, T. 1996. ‘Psyche – Polis – Kosmos’, in Enno, R. (ed.), pp. 26–42.
- Stegemann, 1930, Astrologie und Universalgeschichte. Studien und Interpretationen zu den Dionysiaka des Nonnos von Panopolis
- Spyridakis, 1969, Aristotle on the Election of kosmoi, La Parola del Passato, 24
- Sorabji, 2004, The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD, A Sourcebook. Vol. 2: Physics
- Smyth, 1920, Greek Grammar
- Small, 1951, Marcus Argentarius: A Poet of the Greek Anthology
- Shaw, 2006, The Sublime
- Schwindt, 1994, Das Motiv der Tagesspanne: Ein Beitrag zur Ästhetik der Zeitgestaltung im griechisch-römischen Drama
- West, 1972, Iambi e elegi graeci ante Alexandrum cantati
- Vernant, 1982, The Origins of Greek Thought
- Schweizer-Vüllers, R. 2011. ‘“Siehst du nicht, in welchen Tempel du gekommen bist?”: Der grosse Traum des Scipio – eine Himmelsreise im alten Rom’, in Hornung, E. and Schweizer, A. (eds.), pp. 57–91.
- Sauron, 2007, La peinture allégorique à Pompéi. Le regard de Ciceron
- Salviat, 1989, Symbolisme cosmique et funéraire au mausolée de Glanum, Les dossiers d’archéologie, 140, 46
- Saint-Girons, B. 2014. ‘Sublime’, in Cassin, B. (ed.), pp. 1091–6.
- Sachs, 1937, World History of the Dance
- Russell, 1995, Longinus: On the Sublime
- Russell, 1968, Longinus Libellus de Sublimitate.
- Rolland, 1969, Le Mausolée de Glanum (Saint-Rémyde-Provence). Gallia Suppl. 21
- Zhmud, L. 2013. ‘Die doxographische Tradition’, in Bremer, D., Flashar, H. and Rechenauer, G. (eds.), pp. 150–74.
- Sauron, 1991, De Buthrote à Sperlonga: à propos d’une étude récente sur le thème de la grotte dans les décors romains, RA, 1, 3
- Porter, J. I. 2013. ‘Why Are There Nine Muses?’, in Butler, S. and Purves, A. (eds.), pp. 9–26.
- Stevens, J. A. 2006. ‘The Imagery of Cicero’s Somnium Scipionis’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), pp. 155–65.
- Pohlenz, 1932, τὸ πρέπον. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen Geistes, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Philologisch-Historische Klasse), I, 53
- Plank, 1807, Q. Ennii Medea
- Pierris, 2005, The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity
- Perrin, Y. 1987. ‘La Domus Aurea et l’idéologie néronienne’, in Lévy, E. (ed.), pp. 359–91.
- Patzer, 1952, ΡΑΨΩΙΔΟΣ, Hermes, 80
- Pascal, 1899, Quaestionum Ennianarum: Particula IV, RFIC, 27, 1
- Parker, R. 1989. ‘Spartan Religion’, in Powell, A. and Cartledge, P. (eds.), pp. 142–72.
- O’Meara, 2003, Platonopolis
- O’Brien, 1964, Orestes and the Gorgon: Euripides’ Elektra, AJP, 85, 13
- Nehamas, 1989, Plato: Symposium
- Naddaf, 1992, L’origine et l’évolution du concept grec de phúsis d’après le livre X des Lois de Platon
- Mourelatos, 2008, The Route of Parmenides
- Most, G. W. 2012. ‘The Sublime, Today?’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.), pp. 239–66.
- Morin, 2004, Les monstres des armes d’Achille dans l’Électre d’Euripide (v. 452–477): une mise en abîme de l’action?, RPhA, 22
- Merlan, 1967, Aristoteles’ und Epikurs müssige Götter, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 21
- Meier, 2004, Deiokes, König der Meder: eine Herodot-Episode in ihren Kontexten
- Schmalzriedt, 1970, ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ: zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel
- Massa, 2014, Tra la vigna e la croce. Dioniso nei discorsi letterari e figurativi cristiani
- Mari, Z. 2012. ‘Antinoo a Villa Adriana’, in Sappelli Ragni, M. (ed.), pp. 78–91.
- Mansfeld, 2010, Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, 3
- Mansfeld, 1971, The Pseudo-Hippocratic Tract ΠΕΡΙ ἙΒΔΟΜΑΔΩΝ Ch. 1–11 and Greek Philosophy
- MacDowell, 1971, Aristophanes: Wasps
- Macé, A. and Therme, A.-L. 2013. ‘Anaxagore et Homère: trier les moutons, trier les hommes, trier l’univers’, in Desclos, M.-L. and Fronterotta, F. (eds.), pp. 235–61.
- Walsh, 1977, The First Stasimon of Euripides’ Electra, YClS, 25
- Ludwich, 1899, Kant’s Stellung zum Griechenthum
- Snell, 1924, Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie: sophia, gnōmē, synesis, historia, mathēma, epistēmē
- Lonsdale, S. H. 1995. ‘A Dancing Floor for Ariadne (Iliad 18.590–592): Aspects of Ritual Movement in Homer and Minoan Religion’, in Carter, J. B. and Morris, S. P. (eds.), pp. 273–84.
- Long, 1996, Stoic Studies
- Livrea, E. 2003. ‘The Nonnus Question Revisited’, in Accorinti, D. and Chuvin, P. (eds.), pp. 447–55.
- Engberg-Pederson, 2000, Paul and the Stoics
- Vlastos, G. 2008. ‘“Names” of Being in Parmenides’, in Mourelatos, A. P., pp. 367–86.
- Emilsson, E. K. 2012. ‘Plato and Plotinus on Soul and Action’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C. (eds.), pp. 350–67.
- Éliade, 1964, Traité d’histoire des religions
- Derron, 2015, Cosmologies et cosmogonies dans la littérature antique: huit exposés suivis de discussions et d’un epilogue
- Ebert, 1989, Wo beginnt der Weg der Doxa? Eine Textumstellung im Fragment 8 des Parmenides, Phronesis, 34
- Deleuze, 1990, The Logic of Sense
- Vian, 1990, Nonnos de Panopolis. ‘Les Dionysiaques t. IX’: Chants XXV–XXIX.
- Brague, 1990, Herméneutique et ontologie: mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque
- Torelli, M. 1995a. ‘A Templum Augurale of the Republican Period at Bantia’, in Torelli, M. (ed.), pp. 97–129.
- Chapouthier, 1935, Les Dioscures au service d’une déesse. Étude d’iconographie religieuse
- D’Acunto, 2009, Lo scudo di Achilles nell’ Iliade: esperienze ermeneutische a confronto
- Sedley, D. N. 2017. ‘Divinisation’, in Destrée, P. and Giannopoulou, Z. (eds.), pp. 88–107.
- Csapo, E. 2009. ‘New Music’s Gallery of Images: The “Dithyrambic” First Stasimon of Euripides’ Electra’, in Cousland. J. R. C. and Hume, J. R. (eds.), pp. 95–109.
- Graham, D. W. 2005. ‘The Topology and Dynamics of Empedocles’ Cycle’, in Pierris, A. L. (ed.), pp. 225–44.
- Hine, 1981, An Edition with Commentary of Seneca, Natural Questions, Book 2
- Cropp, 1988, Euripides: Electra
- Lauritzen, 2013, Le Voyage des Legends. Hommages à Pierre Chuvin
- Kranz, 1958, Kosmos, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte
- Deschamps, 1987, La salle à manger de Varron à Casinum ou “Dis-moi où tu manges, je te dirai qui tu es.”, Bulletin de la Société toulousaine d’Études classiques, 191, 63
- Collatz, 1998, Dissertatiunculae criticae: Festschrift für Günther Christian Hansen.
- Kranz, 1938, Stasimon
- Codoñer (Merino), 1979, L. Annaei Senecae Naturales Quaestiones, 2
- Chuvin, 2003, Nonnos de Panopolis: ‘Les Dionysiaques t. III’: Chants VI–VIII
- Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. 2013a. ‘The Chorus in the Middle’, in Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. (eds.), pp. 1–35.
- Ehlers, W.-W. 1998. ‘Zum Prologschluß der Casina’, in Collatz, C. F., Dummer, J., Kollesch, J. and Werlitz, M.-L. (eds.), pp. 183–92.
- Laurent, 2003, Les dieux de Platon. Actes du Colloque international organisé à l’Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, les 24, 25 et 26 janvier 2002: textes réunis et présentés par Jérôme Laurent
- Chantraine, 1968, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots
- Mansfeld, 1992, ΠΕΡΙ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ: A Note on the History of a Title, Vigiliae Christianae, 46, 391
- D’Alfonso, 1993, La χορεία astrale in un passo del Fedro platonico (246e–247a), Helikon, 23
- Jowett, 1892, The Dialogues of Plato, 5
- Cooper, J. 2003. ‘Plato and Aristotle on “Finality” and “(Self-)Sufficiency”’, in Heinaman, R. (ed.), pp. 117–47.
- Cartledge, 2001, Spartan Reflections
- Mulryne, 1977, Poetic Structures in the Electra of Euripides, LCM, 2, 41
- Hickmann, 2006, Studies in Music Archaeology V
- Sappelli Ragni, 2012, Antinoo. Il fascino della bellezza
- Carrière, 1979, Le carnaval et la politique. Une introduction à la comédie grecque
- Holt, 1878, The Ormulum, with the Notes and Glossary of R. M. White, 2
- Howatson, 2008, Plato: The Symposium
- Short, W. M. 2014. ‘Metafora’, in Bettini, M. and Short, W. M. (eds.), pp. 329–52.
- Lévêque, 1964, Clisthène l’Athénien
- Gow, 1968, The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip, 2
- Seure, 1932, La volière de Varron, Revue de Philologie, 58
- Carlier, 1984, La royauté en Grèce avant Alexandre
- Effe, 1970, Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der Aristotelischen Schrift ‘Über die Philosophie.’
- Bourcier, 1989, Danser devant les dieux. La notion de divin dans l’orchestique
- Denniston, 1939, Euripides: Electra
- Franklin, J. C. 2006. ‘The Wisdom of the Lyre: Soundings in Ancient Greece, Cyprus and the Near East’, in Hickmann, E. and Eichmann, R. (eds.), pp. 379–97.
- Aubenque, 1987, Études sur Parménide. Tome II, Problèmes d’interprétation, Bibliothèque d’histoire de la philosophie
- Chuvin, 1991, Mythologie et géographie dionysiaques: Recherches sur l’oeuvre de Nonnos de Panopolis
- Jaeger, W. 1966a. ‘Solon’s Eunomia’, in W. Jaeger (ed.), pp. 101–43.
- Asheri, D. 2007. ‘Book I’, in Asheri, D., Lloyd, A. B. and Corcella, A. (eds.), pp. 57–218.
- Deroux, 2006, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XIII. Collection Latomus 301
- Gigli Piccardi, 1985, Metafora e poetica in Nonno di Panopoli
- Accorinti, 2003, Des géants à Dionysos. Mélanges de mythologie et de poésie grecques offerts à Francis Vian
- Faber, R. 2016. ‘Nonnus and the Poetry of Ekphrasis in the Dionysiaka’, in D. Accorinti (ed.), pp. 443–59.
- Carrière, 2004, Politique, éducation et pulsions “naturelles” dans les “Guêpes”: de la comédie sociale “réaliste” à la subversion comique “carnavalesque” et au triomphe de Dionysos, Dioniso, 3, 66
- Harris, 1976, The Significance of Neoplatonism: From Theory to Method and Back Again
- Calame, 2011, Review of Ferrari 2008, Mnemosyne, 64
- Cristiani, 2006, Incontri Triestini di Filologia Classica., 4
- Calvo, T. 2000. ‘El orden de la virtudes y las Leyes de Platón’, in Lisi, F. (ed.), pp. 51–63.
- Broadie, 2012, Nature and Divinity in Plato’s ‘Timaeus’
- Carruesco, J. 2012. ‘Helen’s Voice and Choral Mimesis from Homer to Stesichorus’, in Riu, X. and Pòrtulas, J. (eds.), pp. 149–72.
- Arcellaschi, 1990, Médée dans le théâtre latin d’Ennius à Sénèque
- Partenie, 2009, Plato’s Myths
- Kraus, 2007, Visualizing the Tragic
- Festugière, 1956, Un fragment nouveau du “Protreptique” d’Aristote, Revue philosophique de la France et l’Étranger, 146
- Bill, 1901, Notes on the Greek θεωρός and θεωρία, TAPA, 32, 196
- Brisson, L. 2000. ‘Le Collège de veille (nukterinòs súllogos)’, in Lisi, F. (ed.), pp. 161–77.
- Burkert, W. 2008. ‘Prehistory of Presocratic Philosophy in an Orientializing Context,’ in Curd, P. and Graham, D. (eds.), pp. 55–85.
- Saunders, 1962, The Structure of the Soul and the State in Plato’s Laws, Eranos, 60, 37
- Boyancé, 1940, Aedes Catuli, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire de l’École française de Rome, 57, 64
- Drabkin, 1937, The Medea Exul of Ennius
- Alexander, L. 2001. ‘IPSE DIXIT: Citation of Authority in Paul and in the Jewish and Hellenistic Schools’, in Engberg-Pederson, T. (ed.), pp. 103–28.
- 328Sauron, 2009, Dans l’intimité des maîtres du monde. Les décors privés des Romains
- Algeo, J. 1998. ‘Vocabulary,’ in Hogg, R. M., Blake, N. F., Romaine, S., Lass, R. and Burchfield R. W. (eds.), pp. 57–91.
- Richards, 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric
- Panagl, 1971, Die dithyrambischen Stasima des Euripides: Untersuchungen zur Komposition und Erzähltechnik
- Belloni, 2006, Deioce, o “della regalità”: (Erodoto 1.95–101), Prometheus, 32
- Armstrong, A. H. 1976. ‘The Apprehension of Divinity in the Self and Cosmos in Plotinus’, in Harris, R. B. (ed.), pp. 187–98.
- Furley, D. J. 1999. ‘Cosmology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), pp. 412–51.
- Hornung, 2011, Jenseitsreisen: Eranos 2009 und 2010
- Jocelyn, 1967, The Tragedies of Ennius
- Bollack, 2006, Parménide: de l’étant au monde
- Boeckh, 1819, Philolaos des Pythagoreers Lehren nebst den Bruchstücken seines Werkes
- Agosti, 2004, Nonno di Panopoli: Le Dionisiache (Canti XXV–XXXIX)
- Brennan, T. 2015. ‘Number: M. 10.248-309’, in Algra, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), pp. 324–64.
- Cumont, 1942, Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraire des Romains
- Riu, 2012, Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry
- Hardie, 2009, Lucretian Receptions
- Anscombe, 1957, Intention
- Carone, G. R. 1997. ‘The Ethical Function of Astronomy in Plato’s Timaeus’, in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), pp. 341–49.
- De Finis, 1989, Scena e spettacolo nell’antichità
- Kurke, 1995, Herodotus and the Language of Metals, Helios, 22, 36
- Rhodes, 2003, Greek Historical Inscriptions: 404–323 BC
- du Sablon, 2014, Le système conceptuel de l’ordre du monde dans la pensée grecque à l’époque archaïque: timè, moira, kosmos, themis et dikè chez Homère et Hésiode
- Wright, 1995, Cosmology in Antiquity
- Bien, 1982, Himmelsbetrachter und Glücksforscher: Zwei Ausprägungen des antiken Philosophiebegriffs, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 26
- Deleuze, 1994, What Is Philosophy?
- Inwood, 2002, The Poem of Empedocles
- Ladewig, 1848, Analecta scenica
- Hetland, L. 2009. ‘Zur Datierung des Pantheon’, in Graßhoff, G., Heinzelmann, M. and Wäfler, M. (eds.), pp. 107–16.
- Brisson, 2006, Platon: Les Lois
- Hülsz, E. 2012. ‘Heraclitus on the Sun’, in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A. (eds.), pp. 3–24.
- Fayant, 1998, Hermes dans les Dionysiaques, REG, 111
- Bulwer, 1653, Anthropometamorphosis: Man Transform’d; or the Artificiall Changeling
- Fantuzzi, M. 2018. ‘Describing Images/Connoting Feelings: Choral Ekphrasis in Euripides’, in Chaniotis, A. (ed.), pp. 21–49.
- Edmonds, 1931, Elegy and Iambus: Being the Remains of all the Greek Elegiac and Iambic Poets from Callinus to Crates, excepting the Choliambic Writers
- Färber, 1936, Die Lyrik in der Kunsttheorie der Antike
- Inwood, 2002, The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism
- Fenwick, 2017, TRAC 2007: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference
- Lisi, 2000, Plato’s Laws and Its Historical Significance. Selected Papers of the 1st International Congress on Ancient Thought, Salamanca, 1998
- Chantraine, 2009, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots
- Marshall, 2010, Living Next Door to a Roman Comedy: Structure in Plautus’ Mercator, NECJ, 37, 65
- Finkelberg, 1998, On the History of the Greek ΚΟΣΜΟΣ, HSCP, 98
- Goldhill, S. 1999. ‘Programme Notes’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), pp. 1–29.
- England, 1921, Plato: The Laws
- Keydell, 1931, Die griechische Poesie der Kaiserzeit (bis 1929), JAW, 230, 41
- Francis, J. A. 2012. ‘The Value of Chorality in Ancient Greece’, in Papadopoulos, J. and Urton, G. (eds.), pp. 218–35.
- 314Franklin, J. C. 2013. ‘“Songbenders of Circular Choruses”: Dithyramb and the “Demise of Music”’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), pp. 213–36.
- Frangoulis, H. 2003. ‘Les pierres magiques dans les Dionysiaques de Nonnos de Panopolis’, in Accorinti, D. and Chuvin, P. (eds.), pp. 433–45.
- Fränkel, 1962, Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums: eine Geschichte der griechischen Epik, Lyrik und Prosa bis zur Mitte des fünften Jahrhunderts
- Aktüre, Z. 2007. ‘Typological Studies of Ancient Theatre Architecture: the Tree vs. the Rhizome Model’, in Fenwick, C., Wiggins, M. and Wythe, D. (eds.), pp. 89–107.
- Frère, J. , 1987. ‘Parménide et l’ordre du monde: fr. VIII, 50–61’, in Aubenque, P. (ed.), pp. 192–212.
- De Vries, J. G. 1976. ‘Dancing Stars (Sophocles, Antigone 1146)’, in Bremer, J. M., Radt, S. L. and Ruijgh, C. J. (eds.), pp. 471–74.
- Gagarin, 1986, Early Greek Law
- Gartziou-Tatti, 2004, Η ΑΣΠΙΔΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΟΠΛΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΧΙΛΛΕΑ. ΕΥΡΙΠΙΔΗ, Ἡλέκτρα στ. 455-475, Métis, 2, 71
- Germany, R. 2014. ‘The Unity of Time in Menander’, in Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.), pp. 90–105.
- Rancière, 1999, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy
- Graf, F. 1995. ‘Ekphrasis: Die Entstehung der Gattung in der Antike’, in Boehm, G. and Pfotenhauer, H. (eds.), pp. 143–55.
- Ross, 1952, Select Fragments
- Dover, 1972, Aristophanic Comedy
- Hutchinson, 2005, Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 193
- Jaeger, 1966, Five Essays
- Gotthelf, 1985, Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to D.M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday
- Agócs, 2012, Receiving the Komos: Ancient and Modern Receptions of the Victory Ode
200 of 242 shown
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Life of Breath in Literature, Culture and Medicine
Fuller, D., Saunders, C., & Macnaughton, J. (2021) · Palgrave studies in literature, science and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74443-4 · Cited by 17
Atkins, C. S. (2021) · New Testament Studies · doi:10.1017/s0028688521000114 · Cited by 2
Our Common Breath: ‘Conspiration’ from the Stoics to the Church Fathers
Horky, P. S. (2021) · Palgrave studies in literature, science and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74443-4_3 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPatrizi, panpsychism, and the Presocratics
Hladký, V. (2024) · Intellectual History Review · doi:10.1080/17496977.2023.2283921 · Cited by 1
Untimely Breathings inThe Rape of Lucrece
Tsentourou, N. (2021) · Shakespeare · doi:10.1080/17450918.2021.1957995 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Horky, P. S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Horky, Phillip Sidney
- Venue
- Cosmos in the Ancient World
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2019-07-04
- Pages
- 270-294
- OpenAlex
- W2949650648
- Semantic Scholar
- c2d3f611e5011e3b1bba5070b393c17d24698e6b
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 499
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- breath, Pythagoreans, Stoics, Philo of Alexandria, Posidonius, Genesis creation narrative, Holy Spirit, body of Christ, early Christianity, biblical exegesis, divine intelligence, Platonic cosmology, Timaeus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review