Power in the Food Value Chain: Theory and Metrics
Open accessAbstract
Chapter 12 introduces a new economic framework to analyse power in the food value chain. Spurred on by the increased interest of policy makers and antitrust authorities over the last decade, academic scholarship has made progress in analysing the origins and consequences of different dimensions of power across the value chain: buyer power, bargaining power, economic dependence. This Chapter summarises the key concepts used to analyse and measure power in the food value chain and explores the different theories of harm that have been developed and occasionally tested in recent cases. Far from representing just a ‘mirror image’ of the exercise of seller power, the analysis of buyer power may at times require a different set of analytical tools and a more detailed, case-by-case understanding of its specific origins and effects. From then on, the authors move to suggesting a broader theoretical framework that would encompass all different dimensions of power in the value chain, under the rubric of vertical power. After defining the theoretical contours of the concept, the authors offer some metrics that enable an empirical verification of the existence and exercise of vertical power.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of studies document the disparity in bargaining power between large corporations and suppliers, which can have negative outcomes, such as dominant firms collectively seeking to lower the prices they pay to the producers who supply them.
“A number of studies docu ment the disparity in bargaining power between large corporations and suppliers, which can have negative outcomes, such as dominant firms collectively seeking to lower the prices they pay to the producers who supply them (e.g., Wood et al. 2021a; Lianos et al. 2022; De Schutter 2010; Howard 2021).”
From Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems (2025) · cites this paper as Lianos et al. 2022
Cites
Competition Policy and the Control of Buyer Power
Carstensen, P. (2017) · doi:10.4337/9781782540588 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems
Clapp, J., Vriezen, R., Laila, A., Conti, C., Gordon, L., Hicks, C., & Rao, N. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102897 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lianos, I., Smichowski, B. C., Lindeboom, J., & Lombardi, C.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Venue
- Global Food Value Chains and Competition Law
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2022-05-05
- Pages
- 256-314
- OpenAlex
- W4280503092
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Konkurrensverket
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Keywords
- vertical power, buyer power, bargaining power, economic dependence, seller power, theories of harm, competition law, food supply chain, power metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review