Cited by 13Artificial Intelligence in LawE-Government and Public ServicesDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Legal Sources to Programming Code: Automatic Individual Decisions in Public Administration and Computers under the Rule of Law

Schartum, Dag Wiese·2020·The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms

Abstract

Public administration in Norway and in many other countries has used computers for more than fifty-five years. It is normal and necessary. Of course, it is possible to imagine many more office buildings where thousands of men and women would do all the detailed processing of individual cases that are processed today by computers, but this alternative is not very realistic: Modern taxation systems, national social insurance schemes and management of many other welfare programs would not be feasible without the use of computers and the algorithmic law that is integrated in the software. Thus, the question is not if public administration should apply computer technology, but how this should be done. This chapter deals with important how-to questions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108680844.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Schartum, D. W.
Corresponding author
Schartum, Dag Wiese
Venue
The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms
Published
2020-10-31
Pages
301-336
OpenAlex
W3094351589
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
17.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
algorithmic law, public administration, computerization of public administration, sources of law, computer code, social welfare programs, tax system, social insurance, legal informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Legal Sources to Programming Code: Automatic Individual Decisions in Public Administration and Computers under the Rule of Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781108680844.016
The paper
Schartum, D. W. (2020). From Legal Sources to Programming Code: Automatic Individual Decisions in Public Administration and Computers under the Rule of Law. The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680844.016