Conservative Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe
Abstract
How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler's 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy's fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today's new and old democracies under siege.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
National parties that represent business have economic incentives to constrain democracy.
“Finally, national parties that represent business have economic incentives to constrain democracy (Ziblatt 2017).”
From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Ziblatt 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108957809 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding
GRUMBACH, J. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000934 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“Tor instance, Ziblatt (2017) points to the importance of conservative parties as historical coalitions of groups with economic incentives to constrain democracy.”
BackgroundRevisiting lesson-drawing: methods to assess policy’s institutional transferability
Yamada, M. (2026) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2025.2574112 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ziblatt, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ziblatt, Daniel
- ORCID
- Ziblatt, Daniel
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-04-17
- OpenAlex
- W4238054119
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 38.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › European Political History Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- democratic backsliding, democratic stability, Conservative Party, radical right, democratic transition, Weimar Germany, Adolf Hitler, British liberalism, middle class, political elites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review