The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biopsychosocial Factors in Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis for Fetal Anomaly
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bryant found, that undergoing NIPT as well as invasive testing, is often associated with high levels of anxiety (because of the fear of a positive result) [7].”
From Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
Labonté, V., Alsaid, D., Lang, B., & Meerpohl, J. J. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x · Cited by 39
Antenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: The Impact of NIPT
Bryant, L. D. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0028658 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryant, L. D.
- Corresponding author
- Bryant, Louise D.
- ORCID
- Bryant, Louise D.
- Venue
- Biopsychosocial Factors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-08-16
- Pages
- 237-244
- OpenAlex
- W2748493824
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- prenatal screening, prenatal diagnosis, fetal malformations, biopsychosocial factors, psychosocial factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
