Cited by 249Political Conflict and GovernanceSpanish History and PoliticsTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Rivalry and Revenge: The Politics of Violence during Civil War

Balcells, Laia·2017·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

What explains violence against civilians in civil wars? Why do groups kill civilians in areas where they have full military control and their rivals have no military presence? This innovative book connects pre-war politics to patterns of violence during civil war. It argues that both local political rivalry and local revenge account for violence against civilians. Armed groups perpetrate direct violence jointly with local civilians, who collaborate when violence can help them gain or consolidate local political control. As civil war continues, revenge motives also come into play, leading to spirals of violence at a local level. In an important contribution to the study of the Spanish Civil War, Balcells combines statistical analyses with ethnographic and qualitative research to provide new insights to scholars and academic researchers with an interest in civil war, politics and conflict processes. Rivalry and Revenge is theoretically and empirically rich, and it offers a theory and method generalizable to a wide set of cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316392737

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Balcells (2017) shows that in conventional civil wars, identification and civilian victimization can be driven by ideological commitments antedating the outbreak of the armed conflict.

    “In her study of the Spanish civil war, Balcells (2017) shows that in conventional civil wars, identification and civilian victimization can be driven by ideological commitments antedating the outbreak of the armed conflict.”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Balcells (2017)

  • More recent literature at least partly questions the radical detachment of micro-level patterns from overall macrolevel cleavages.

    “However, by highlighting the crucial role played by the path-dependence of prewar identities and structures, the more recent literature at least partly questions this radical detachment of micro-level patterns from overall, macrolevel cleavages (see, e.g., Balcells 2017).”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Balcells 2017

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 249

Authors
Balcells, L.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Balcells, Laia
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2017-01-01
OpenAlex
W2798772275
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
32.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Spanish History and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
violence against civilians, civil war, revenge, political rivalry, armed groups, Spanish Civil War, conflict escalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review