Rivalry and Revenge: The Politics of Violence during Civil War
Abstract
What explains violence against civilians in civil wars? Why do groups kill civilians in areas where they have full military control and their rivals have no military presence? This innovative book connects pre-war politics to patterns of violence during civil war. It argues that both local political rivalry and local revenge account for violence against civilians. Armed groups perpetrate direct violence jointly with local civilians, who collaborate when violence can help them gain or consolidate local political control. As civil war continues, revenge motives also come into play, leading to spirals of violence at a local level. In an important contribution to the study of the Spanish Civil War, Balcells combines statistical analyses with ethnographic and qualitative research to provide new insights to scholars and academic researchers with an interest in civil war, politics and conflict processes. Rivalry and Revenge is theoretically and empirically rich, and it offers a theory and method generalizable to a wide set of cases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Balcells (2017) shows that in conventional civil wars, identification and civilian victimization can be driven by ideological commitments antedating the outbreak of the armed conflict.
“In her study of the Spanish civil war, Balcells (2017) shows that in conventional civil wars, identification and civilian victimization can be driven by ideological commitments antedating the outbreak of the armed conflict.”
From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Balcells (2017)
More recent literature at least partly questions the radical detachment of micro-level patterns from overall macrolevel cleavages.
“However, by highlighting the crucial role played by the path-dependence of prewar identities and structures, the more recent literature at least partly questions this radical detachment of micro-level patterns from overall, macrolevel cleavages (see, e.g., Balcells 2017).”
From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Balcells 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 249
- Authors
- Balcells, L.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Balcells, Laia
- ORCID
- Balcells, Laia
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2798772275
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Spanish History and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- violence against civilians, civil war, revenge, political rivalry, armed groups, Spanish Civil War, conflict escalation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review