The DOI matches its Crossref record; 236 of the 238 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Open accessAbstract
Before the Civil War, colonization schemes and black laws threatened to deport former slaves born in the United States. Birthright Citizens recovers the story of how African American activists remade national belonging through battles in legislatures, conventions, and courthouses. They faced formidable opposition, most notoriously from the US Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott. Still, Martha S. Jones explains, no single case defined their status. Former slaves studied law, secured allies, and conducted themselves like citizens, establishing their status through local, everyday claims. All along they argued that birth guaranteed their rights. With fresh archival sources and an ambitious reframing of constitutional law-making before the Civil War, Jones shows how the Fourteenth Amendment constitutionalized the birthright principle, and black Americans' aspirations were realized. Birthright Citizens tells how African American activists radically transformed the terms of citizenship for all Americans.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Martha S. Jones argues that antebellum free African Americans, especially in Baltimore, developed and pressed claims to birthright citizenship through a vernacular legal culture of courthouse appearances, conventions, and newspapers, ideas that anticipated the Fourteenth Amendment. The book is built around William Yates's 1838 treatise *Rights of Colored Men* and the author's discovery that two different men named William Yates stood behind the era's black rights activism.
Key findings
- Free people of color claimed an "unassailable belonging" grounded in birthright citizenship; no legal text expressly provided for it, but their ideas anticipated the Fourteenth Amendment, which along with the Civil Rights Act of 1866 affirmed that the US-born were citizens independent of "race, color, or previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude."
- Rights were secured through performance: "rights holders were those who did what rights holders did." Black Baltimoreans traveled between states, gathered in religious assemblies, sued and were sued, testified, and secured persons and property — "the rights they inhabited became the rights they held."
- Yates's treatise held that citizenship is distinct from political rights and "strikes deeper" than the vote; it rested on four principles, including that free people of color were citizens under Article 4, section 2, clause 1 and entitled to its "privileges and immunities," and that denial of the vote did not make one a noncitizen.
- After *Scott v. Sandford* (1857), "nothing changed in Baltimore": residents continued to exercise rights, Maryland's high court declined to adopt Dred Scott's reasoning and affirmed free people of color's right to protect persons and property, and a legislative push for reenslavement or expulsion failed after black Baltimoreans lobbied against it.
- Baltimore was the nation's third largest city and home to the nation's largest free black community, "some 25,000 residents"; on the eve of the Civil War nearly half a million people, mostly US-born, lived with rights subject to political whim.
- The author resolves a historiographic confusion: Charles Wesley treated Yates as a pioneering black historian, John Myers assumed he was white — Myers was correct. The treatise writer was a white antislavery agent; a second William Yates, born a slave in Virginia, purchased his freedom, worked as a porter at the Supreme Court, moved to San Francisco, and wrote for the *Elevator* under the pen name "Amigo."
Methods
- A history of race and rights told "through a series of disruptive vignettes," linking ordinary black litigants to better-remembered lawyers, judges, and legislators; the author frames rights as a process by which black Americans "imagined, claimed, and enacted their relationship to law," drawing on Bonnie Honig's account of outsider rights claims.
- Sources are "shardlike courthouse records — dockets, minute books, and case files" from Baltimore, read alongside newspapers, political conventions, and legislative and high-court debates; the study is grounded in a local legal culture framed by jurisdiction.
- Structure: chapters 1–4 trace legal consciousness among black Baltimoreans; chapters 5–7 examine their turn to the local courthouse (church property disputes, black laws, insolvency, apprenticeship and habeas corpus); chapter 8 treats the era of *Scott v. Sandford*; the conclusion looks at early Reconstruction.
Limitations
- Stated by the author: grounding the book in the perspective of black activists gives it "a selective and sometimes partial view of the era's citizenship debate"; *Corfield v. Coryell* (1823), later deemed influential, is "outside the scope of this book" because there is no evidence it influenced thinking about free African Americans in Baltimore.
- Stated by the author: this is "not... a story of unbridled agency in a triumphalist sense" — inhabiting rights and comporting oneself like a citizen "only sometimes secured justice," and "just as often, just ends remained elusive."
- Evident from the text: the excerpt is the book's introduction, so the evidentiary detail behind its claims (individual case files, chapter-level findings) is not shown here; the author also notes that the antebellum equation linking rights and citizenship "was never fixed," and that courts, commentators, and treatise writers disagreed and changed their minds, leaving no settled answer to whether black Americans were citizens.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
27 Sources not found · 21 No basis given · 16 Own interpretation · 4 Own result · 1 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates led a mid-1850s challenge against a state law that barred black testimony against the interests of white people.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They too were students of law, though of a less orthodox sort, gleaning ideas from the world around them.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He had a legal education, the kind acquired through the negotiations that secured his liberty and through observing the goings-on in the nation's high court.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“His labors earned him enough to secure the manumission of his wife, Emeliner, and their three children.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“William Yates the reviewer for the Elevator was born a slave”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It was 1838 when Rights of Colored Men to Suffrage, Citizenship, and Trial by Jury was published in Philadelphia.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Yates authored the very fi rst legal treatise on the rights of free black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether for or against designating them as citizens, there was widespread agreement about the need to situate former slaves in the nation's legal regime.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The evidence gleaned from early American Anti-Slavery Society reports supports Myers's conclusion that Yates was a white abolitionist, a memorable one for his having worked with black people in the North.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He built his arguments on the published opinions of judges, legislators, and constitutional framers who also advocated that free black Americans had rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some say he read law for a time, although there is no evidence he was admitted to the bar.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Faced with uncertainty, some fl ed for Northern cities, Liberia, or Canada.Many more stayed put.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Still, there is no evidence that Corfi eld infl uenced the thinking about free African Americans in Baltimore or elsewhere.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Commentators and treatise writers were never in accord and amended their writings to refl ect changed thinking.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His discussion of citizenship was original, a structured synthesis that brought together a close reading of the Constitution with congressional debates and learned commentary.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His institutional home had been the American Anti-Slavery Society, in which black men were marginalized in the 1830s.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Rights of Colored Men received prominent notices in the black and abolitionist press and could be purchased at local antislavery society offi ces.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There had been two men named William Yates.The Yates who penned the Elevator review and the one who authored Rights of Colored Men were not one and the same.”
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They developed legal consciousness -an understanding of their lives through law -and sought badges of citizenship.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sometimes citizenship was defi ned in constitutions and statutes, although most of the time it was not.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Charles Wesley was the fi rst historian to recover Yates.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He was not one of antebellum America's highly regarded legal minds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Myers did not directly address the matter of Yates's racial identity, and assumed that he had been a white man who worked closely with black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Free black activists were generally of one mind.But even if they agreed that they were citizens, they did not agree about whether the state might affi rm that fact.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From Virginia, Yates purchased his freedom”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Courts disagreed and even changed their minds over who was a citizen and what rights might attach to that status.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some, being a citizen was the gateway to rights.Citizenship was a prerequisite to the right to vote.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“migrated to Washington, DC, and began working as a porter at the United States Supreme Court.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For others, exercising rights was evidence of citizenship.If a person exercised the right to vote, it was evidence that he was a citizen.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yates had moved to San Francisco, where he became a public fi gure.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In1865 he headed the black state convention's committee on voting rights.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This view defers to the opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney, who held that no African American, enslaved or free, was a citizen of the United States.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The result is a history, told through a series of disruptive vignettes, that suggests how people without rights still exercised them.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most powerful was Yates's argument about how law, though suffering from amnesia, could be made right.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No legal text expressly provided for such, but their ideas anticipated the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates provides a window onto the position that some activists -black and white -took on race and citizenship at the end of the 1830s.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Other studies have examined African American rights during the antebellum period, although few have expressly linked rights to citizenship as this book does.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Men like San Francisco's William Yates wrote for newspapers, engaged in the vernacular study of law, debated in political conventions, and conducted themselves like rights-bearing individuals, all the while pressing for a radical redefi nition of citizenship.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quotidian courthouse appearances resonate with debates in legislatures, high courts, and political conventions.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates's text fueled understandings of the role that law might play in claims for free black rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“But Yates's text was also a work of advocacy.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The discovery of a second William Yates is more than coincidence.It is an affi rmation of the very premise of this book.Black Americans can serve as our guides through a history of race and rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Inhabiting rights and comporting themselves like citizens only sometimes secured justice.”
- Also stated in: § Rights of Colored Men: Debating Citizenship in Antebellum America · plain
“Just as often, just ends remained elusive.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Rights of Colored Men: Debating Citizenship in Antebellum America · plain
In the paper
“When examining high court decisions, historians have relied on the 1857 case of Scott v. Sandford to explain the legal status of black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectn = 1,857- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Legal culture was also capable of reform, of itself and of the status of black Americans.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This view credits federal offi cials and Congress members with having devised and set in place the principle of jus soli in American law.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To the degree the concept was relevant, it guaranteed few rights or privileges, with neither voting rights nor property ownership, for example, dependent on citizenship.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Still others have looked for the origins of African American citizenship in the era of Reconstruction, with the ratifi cation of the Fourteenth Amendment's birthright citizenship provision.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His bona fi des on the subject of race and citizenship were best established during his years as an agent for the American Anti-Slavery Society.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Citations
Cites
Cities of the dead: circum-Atlantic performance
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1318 · Cited by 1,786
The alchemy of race and rights
Munster, A. (1992) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(92)90026-6 · Cited by 1,280
The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City
Newman, K., & Wyly, E. K. (2006) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980500388710 · Cited by 834
Honig, B. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781400824816 · Cited by 704
Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life
Lukes, S. (2014) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306114531284q · Cited by 630
Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays.
Cole, G. D. H., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226966 · Cited by 624
Kramer, L. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195169188.001.0001 · Cited by 433
Slaves without Masters: The Free Negro in the Antebellum South
Rudwick, E. M., & Berlin, I. (1976) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1852604 · Cited by 410
Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation
Bell, D. A. (1976) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/795339 · Cited by 405
Johnson, W. (2003) · Journal of Social History · doi:10.1353/jsh.2003.0143 · Cited by 405
The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America.
Prewitt, A. L., & Novak, W. J. (1997) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2952600 · Cited by 347
American Notes for General Circulation
Dickens, C. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511703157 · Cited by 279
Campbell, J. T. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195078923.001.0001 · Cited by 272
The problem of slavery in the age of emancipation
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-6360 · Cited by 259
Black Identity and Black Protest in the Antebellum North
Holloway, J. S., & Rael, P. (2003) · African American Review · doi:10.2307/1512369 · Cited by 256
Sheridan, R. B., & Knight, F. W. (1972) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/77.3.848 · Cited by 255
Sandage, S. A. (2005) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674043053 · Cited by 246
Atlantic Creoles in the Age of Revolutions
Landers, J. G. (2010) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjhzs3s · Cited by 245
Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil
Graber, M. A. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805370 · Cited by 227
The Democratic experiment: new directions in American political history
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6722 · Cited by 217
Harris, L. M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226317755.001.0001 · Cited by 202
Martin Delany, Frederick Douglass, and the politics of representative identity
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0781 · Cited by 198
The Lost Century of American Immigration Law (1776-1875)
Neuman, G. L. (1993) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123006 · Cited by 190
Odious Commerce: Britain, Spain, and the Abolition of the Cuban Slave Trade
Miers, S., & Murray, D. R. (1983) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1869545 · Cited by 183
Republic of Debtors: Bankruptcy in the Age of American Independence
Matson, C. D., & Mann, B. H. (2003) · Journal of the Early Republic · doi:10.2307/3595058 · Cited by 169
A Brighter Coming Day: A Frances Ellen Watkins Harper Reader
Harper, F. E. W., & Foster, F. S. (1991) · Cited by 168
Skeel, D. A. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400828500 · Cited by 160
History of the African Methodist Episcopal Church
Payne, D. A. (1968) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 156
The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature
Simpson, A. W. B. (1981) · The University of Chicago Law Review · doi:10.2307/1599330 · Cited by 148
The Black Man: His Antecedents, His Genius, and His Achievements
Brown, W. W. (2016) · Cited by 145
The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics
Fehrenbacher, D. E. (1979) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1340509 · Cited by 145
Somewhat More Independent: The End of Slavery in New York City, 1770-1810
White, S. (1991) · University of Georgia Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book13971 · Cited by 145
DeLombard, J. M. (2007) · University of North Carolina Press eBooks · doi:10.5149/9780807887738_delombard · Cited by 142
The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution
Ghachem, M. W. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139050173 · Cited by 139
Slave and Citizen: The Negro in the Americas
Aptheker, H., & Tannenbaum., F. (1947) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/52.4.755 · Cited by 132
Slave Law and Claims-Making in Cuba: The Tannenbaum Debate Revisited
de la Fuente, A. (2004) · Law and History Review · doi:10.2307/4141649 · Cited by 131
Deyle, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195160406.001.0001 · Cited by 128
The Early American Public Sphere and the Emergence of a Black Print Counterpublic
Brooks, J. (2005) · William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3491622 · Cited by 125
Discarded Legacy: Politics and Poetics in the Life of Frances E. W. Harper, 1825-1911.
Bacon, M. H., & Boyd, M. J. (1996) · African American Review · doi:10.2307/3042548 · Cited by 125
Slave Life in Rio de Janeiro, 1808-1850
Karasch, M. C. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691196206 · Cited by 124
(2006) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300109009.001.0001 · Cited by 120
The fiery trial: Abraham Lincoln and American slavery
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-4058 · Cited by 119
(2020) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814759837.003.0012 · Cited by 118
Jones, M. S. (2007) · University of North Carolina Press eBooks · doi:10.5149/9780807888902_jones · Cited by 110
Self-citationNavigating Failure: Bankruptcy and Commercial Society in Antebellum America
Rossell, D., & Balleisen, E. J. (2002) · Journal of the Early Republic · doi:10.2307/3125196 · Cited by 101
The Passport in America: The History of a Document
Stowe, W. W. (2011) · Journal of American History · doi:10.1093/jahist/jar045 · Cited by 99
African-American Women's Quilting
Brown, E. B. (1989) · Signs · doi:10.1086/494553 · Cited by 99
Wong, E. L. (2016) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814794555.001.0001 · Cited by 99
Vorenberg, M. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511511691 · Cited by 99
Dunbar, E. A. (2008) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300125917.001.0001 · Cited by 97
Sidbury, J. B. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320107.001.0001 · Cited by 96
The Haitian Declaration of Independence
Gaffield, J. (2016) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 92
One nation under law: America's early national struggles to separate church and state
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4922 · Cited by 88
Law and the Borders of Belonging in the Long Nineteenth Century United States
Welke, B. Y. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511778704 · Cited by 88
Paper Thin: Freedom and Re-enslavement in the Diaspora of the Haitian Revolution
Scott, R. J. (2011) · Law and History Review · doi:10.1017/s0738248011000538 · Cited by 86
Recollections of Seventy Years
Mitchell, S., & O'Connell, W. (1935) · The New England Quarterly · doi:10.2307/359443 · Cited by 86
A History of Negro Slavery in New York
Quarles, B., & McManus, E. J. (1966) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1848351 · Cited by 82
Proceedings of the Black State conventions, 1840-1865
Foner, P. S., & Walker, G. E. (1979) · Temple University Press eBooks · Cited by 80
The Passport in America: The History of a Document
Robertson, C. (2010) · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2891 · Cited by 80
Gray, T., Turner, N. J., & Royster, P. (2021) · Schlager Group eBooks · doi:10.3735/9781935306627.book-part-046 · Cited by 78
Raboteau, A. J., & Sobel, M. (1980) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/85.4.989 · Cited by 78
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4762 · Cited by 74
Pryor, E. S. (2016) · University of North Carolina Press eBooks · doi:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469628578.001.0001 · Cited by 73
Beyond Black and White: Cultural Approaches to Race and Slavery
Gross, A. J. (2001) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123740 · Cited by 69
"The Outskirts of Our Happiness": Race and the Lure of Colonization in the Early Republic
Guyatt, N. (2009) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/27694557 · Cited by 67
Great Britain, the United States, and the Negro Seamen Acts, 1822-1848
Hamer, P. M. (1935) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2191749 · Cited by 67
Haitians and African Americans: a heritage of tragedy and hope
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0450 · Cited by 66
The Law of Freedom and Bondage in the United States
D., T. W., & Hurd, J. (1862) · The American Law Register (1852-1891) · doi:10.2307/3302854 · Cited by 65
Engelbourg, S., & Conkin, P. K. (1981) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/86.4.925 · Cited by 63
An Imperfect Union: Slavery, Federalism and Comity.
Morris, T. D., & Finkelman, P. (1981) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2207419 · Cited by 63
The Constitution of Aspiration and "The Rights That Belong to Us All"
Hartog, H. (1987) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1902163 · Cited by 63
Moral Minorities and the Making of American Democracy
Volk, K. G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199371914.001.0001 · Cited by 60
Habeas Corpus: from England to Empire
Lobban, M. (2011) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552311000085 · Cited by 59
Carroll, J. W., Wind, J. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1996) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.2307/3712007 · Cited by 57
The Urban South and the Coming of the Civil War
Towers, F. (2005) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.7.4.2 · Cited by 57
Hunting, Fishing, and Foraging: common Rights and Class Relations in the Postbellum South
Hahn, S. (1982) · Radical History Review · doi:10.1215/01636545-1982-26-37 · Cited by 56
Reconstructive Poverty Law Practice: Learning Lessons of Client Narrative
Alfieri, A. V. (1991) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/796817 · Cited by 56
The Black Laws: Race and the Legal Process in Early Ohio
Ingersoll, T. N., & Middleton, S. (2005) · American Journal of Legal History · doi:10.2307/30039560 · Cited by 56
A sketch of the laws relating to slavery in the several States of the United States of America
Stroud, G. M. (1956) · Cited by 55
Perl-Rosenthal, N. (2015) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.41379917 · Cited by 54
de la Fuente, A. (2010) · International Labor and Working-Class History · doi:10.1017/s0147547909990305 · Cited by 53
The land shall be deluged in blood: a new history of the Nat Turner revolt
(2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.196638 · Cited by 52
Schooling citizens: the struggle for African American education in antebellum America
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-0477 · Cited by 51
Emancipating New York: The Politics of Slavery and Freedom, 1777-1827
Mason, M. (2007) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.9.4.13 · Cited by 51
African America and Haiti: emigration and black nationalism in the nineteenth century
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1131 · Cited by 50
Negroes and the gun: the black tradition of arms
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184897 · Cited by 49
Freedom's journal: the first African-American newspaper
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1287 · Cited by 49
Olwell, R. (2010) · Slavery and Abolition · doi:10.1080/01440391003711180 · Cited by 47
Power-Greene, O. K. (2016) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479823178.001.0001 · Cited by 47
Winch, J. (2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195086911.001.0001 · Cited by 47
`Pretty Boring Stuff': District Judges and Housing Possession Proceedings
Cowan, D., & Hitchings, E. (2007) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663907079764 · Cited by 46
Clio and the Court: An Illicit Love Affair
Kelly, A. H. (1965) · The Supreme Court Review · doi:10.1086/scr.1965.3108786 · Cited by 45
Blacks in Gold Rush California
Porter, K. W., & Lapp, R. M. (1978) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/83.3.808-a · Cited by 43
The Interregional Slave Trade and the Selection of Slaves for the New Orleans Market
Pritchett, J. B. (1997) · The Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/206166 · Cited by 43
The spirit of the times: amusements in nineteenth-century Baltimore, Norfolk, and Richmond
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4706 · Cited by 43
Through the Codes Darkly: Slave Law and Civil Law in Louisiana
Palmer, V. V. (2012) · Cited by 41
Legal Mobilization for Social Reform: Power and the Politics of Agenda Setting
Kessler, M. (1990) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053789 · Cited by 40
The Atlantic Economy and Colonial Maryland's Eastern Shore
Clemens, P. G. E. (1980) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501733741 · Cited by 38
Maris-Wolf, T. (2015) · University of North Carolina Press eBooks · doi:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469620077.001.0001 · Cited by 38
The Times Were Strange and Stirring
Hildebrand, R. F. (1995) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822381938 · Cited by 37
Scott, R. J. (2001) · Past & Present · doi:10.1093/past/170.1.181 · Cited by 37
Olson, K. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381607080036 · Cited by 37
Freedom has a face: race, identity, and community in Jefferson's Virginia
von Daacke, K. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-5809 · Cited by 36
Bolster, W. J. (2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19m61bs · Cited by 36
Gold, R. (2014) · University of Illinois Press eBooks · doi:10.5406/illinois/9780252038181.001.0001 · Cited by 36
The Negro in Maryland : a study of the institution of slavery
Brackett, J. R. (1969) · Cited by 35
Maryland in Africa: The Maryland State Colonization Society 1831-1857
Pease, J. H., & Campbell, P. (1972) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1917880 · Cited by 35
Fragments of Empire: Capital, Slavery, and Indian Indentured Labor in the British Caribbean
Robotham, D. (2000) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2000.27.2.512 · Cited by 35
Slavery on Trial: Race, Class, and Criminal Justice in Antebellum Richmond, Virginia
Silkenat, D. (2009) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.11.1.17 · Cited by 34
The Role of the Professional Slave Trader in a Slave Economy: Austin Woolfolk, A Case Study
Calderhead, W. L. (1977) · Civil War history · doi:10.1353/cwh.1977.0041 · Cited by 33
Debtors and Creditors in America: Insolvency, Imprisonment for Debt, and Bankruptcy, 1607-1900
Smith, J. H., & Coleman, P. J. (1975) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/1921584 · Cited by 33
Fanning, S. (2007) · Slavery and Abolition · doi:10.1080/01440390701269780 · Cited by 31
Slaughter, T. P. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195046335.001.0001 · Cited by 31
The Struggles of John Brown Russwurm
James, W. (2016) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814742891.001.0001 · Cited by 30
McNamara, M. (2004) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801873959 · Cited by 30
Where is night soil? Thoughts on an urban privy
Geismar, J. H. (1993) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/bf03374173 · Cited by 28
Patronage and Protest in Kate Brown's Washington
Masur, K. (2013) · Journal of American History · doi:10.1093/jahist/jas650 · Cited by 28
Carroll, T. W. (2015) · University of North Carolina Press eBooks · doi:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469619880.001.0001 · Cited by 28
The American South and the Atlantic World
(2013) · University Press of Florida eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx07642 · Cited by 27
Nat Turner and the Rising in Southampton County
Allmendinger, D. F. (2017) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.34893 · Cited by 27
Barker, T. (1992) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · Cited by 26
Rothman, A. (2007) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674042919 · Cited by 26
Raffety, M. T. (2013) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226924014.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Grossberg, M. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528682 · Cited by 26
The African Supplement: Religion, Race, and Corporate Law in Early National America
Gordon, S. (2015) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.5309/willmaryquar.72.3.0385 · Cited by 25
Schor, P. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917853.001.0001 · Cited by 25
Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Supreme Court, 1837-1857
Allen, A. (2006) · University of Georgia Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book11533 · Cited by 25
Reid-Vazquez, M. (2010) · University of Georgia Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book12450 · Cited by 25
A Most Fortunate Ship: A Narrative History of Old Ironsides
Seiken, J., & Martin, T. G. (1998) · The Journal of Military History · doi:10.2307/120194 · Cited by 24
Holy Rebellion: Religious Assembly Laws in Antebellum South Carolina and Virginia
May, N. (2007) · American Journal of Legal History · doi:10.1093/ajlh/49.3.237 · Cited by 24
Fathers of Conscience: Mixed-Race Inheritance in the Antebellum South
Kennington, K. M. (2009) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.11.4.19 · Cited by 24
Bacon, J. (2007) · Lexington Books · doi:10.5771/9780739155202 · Cited by 24
African or American?: black identity and political activism in New York City, 1784-1861
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0458 · Cited by 22
Frederick Douglass and the Fourth of July
Rogers, W. B. (2006) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/4486463 · Cited by 22
Hunting and Fishing in the New South
Giltner, S. E. (2008) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.3487 · Cited by 22
The history of black business in America: capitalism, race, entrepreneurship
Bristol, D. W. (2010) · Business History · doi:10.1080/00076791.2010.500178 · Cited by 21
Ely, M. P. (2004) · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5463 · Cited by 21
Maryland, A Middle Temperament
Brugger, R. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801833991 · Cited by 20
Encyclopedia of antislavery and abolition
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6591 · Cited by 19
:Freedom's Prophet: Bishop Richard Allen, the AME Church, and the Black Founding Fathers
Saillant, J. (2008) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr.113.4.1156 · Cited by 19
Scraping By: Wage Labor, Slavery, and Survival in Early Baltimore
Kennedy, C. M. (2009) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.11.3.16 · Cited by 18
Legal Publishing in Antebellum America
Hoeflich, M. H. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761287 · Cited by 17
Black prophets of justice: activist clergy before the Civil War
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2691 · Cited by 17
The Oxford handbook of African American citizenship, 1865-present
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1755 · Cited by 17
Bathed in Blood: Hunting and Mastery in the Old South
Stowe, S. M., & Proctor, N. W. (2003) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/30040039 · Cited by 15
Atlantic Creoles in the Age of Revolutions
Landers, J. G. (2011) · doi:10.4159/9780674054165 · Cited by 15
Sinha, M., & Eschen, P. M. V. (2007) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/sinh14110 · Cited by 14
The Public Law of a County Court; Judicial Government in Eighteenth Century Massachusetts
Hartog, H. (1976) · American Journal of Legal History · doi:10.2307/844858 · Cited by 14
Substituting Law for the Lash: Emancipation and Legal Formalism in a Mississippi County Court
Waldrep, C. (1996) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2945306 · Cited by 14
Baltimore: The Building of an American City
Cox, R. J., & Olson, S. (1981) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1901948 · Cited by 14
Baltimore: The Nineteenth Century Black Capital.
Esslinger, D. R., & Graham, L. (1983) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2208115 · Cited by 14
Engler, R. (1999) · FLASH - Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship & History (Fordham University) · Cited by 12
Polgar, P. J. (2011) · American Nineteenth Century History · doi:10.1080/14664658.2011.559746 · Cited by 12
American Antislavery Society Agents and the Free Negro, 1833-1838
Myers, J. L. (1967) · The Journal of Negro History · doi:10.2307/2716114 · Cited by 12
The Struggle Over Immigration: Indentured Servants, Slaves, and Articles of Commerce
Bilder, M. S. (1996) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 11
Vansickle, E. S. (2003) · Journal of Transatlantic Studies · doi:10.1080/14794010308656800 · Cited by 11
Fanning, S. (2017) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764930.001.0001 · Cited by 11
The Reconstruction of Southern Debtors: Bankruptcy after the Civil War
Moneyhon, C. H., & Thompson, E. L. (2005) · American Journal of Legal History · doi:10.2307/30039562 · Cited by 10
Cohen, J. (2010) · Journal of the Early Republic · doi:10.1353/jer.0.0132 · Cited by 10
Roger B. Taney and the Slavery Issue: Looking beyond--and before--Dred Scott
Huebner, T. S. (2010) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/jahist/97.1.17 · Cited by 10
The Baltimore Riots of 1812 and the Breakdown of the Anglo-American Mob Tradition
Gilje, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Social History · doi:10.1353/jsh/13.4.547 · Cited by 10
Pioneer Urbanites: A Social and Cultural History of Black San Francisco
Franklin, V. P., & Daniels, D. H. (1981) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1890026 · Cited by 10
Lewis, R. (2010) · Digital Collections at BYU · Cited by 9
William Jay and the Constitutional Movement for the Abolition of Slavery
Tuckerman, B. (1969) · Praeger eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216994602 · Cited by 9
Rehearsal for War: Black Militias in the Atlantic World
Kerr‐Ritchie, J. R. (2005) · Slavery and Abolition · doi:10.1080/01440390500058814 · Cited by 9
American Studies in Black and White: Selected Essays, 1949-1989.
Lipsitz, G., Kaplan, S. M., & Austin, A. D. (1992) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2080058 · Cited by 9
Beyond Originalism: Conservative Declarationism and Constitutional Redemption
Kersch, K. I. (2011) · Digital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) · Cited by 8
Rationing justice: poverty lawyers and poor people in the deep South
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1141 · Cited by 8
Belligerent Instruments: The Documentary Violence of Bleak House
Daly, S. (2015) · Studies in the novel · doi:10.1353/sdn.2015.0005 · Cited by 8
A New Paradigm for the Second Amendment
Cornell, S. (2004) · Law and History Review · doi:10.2307/4141668 · Cited by 8
Producers versus capitalists: constitutional conflict in antebellum America
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0499 · Cited by 8
Practical Treatise on the Law of Slavery
Wheeler, J. D. (1969) · Praeger eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216994503 · Cited by 8
“America's Greatest Criminal Barracks”
Gilfoyle, T. J. (2003) · Journal of Urban History · doi:10.1177/0096144203029005002 · Cited by 7
The Pennsylvania Fugitive Slave Act of 1826
Leslie, W. R. (1952) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2955218 · Cited by 7
The Baltimore Bank Riot: Political Upheaval in Antebellum Maryland
Shalhope, R. E. (2009) · Cited by 7
Making Blacks Foreigners: The Legal Construction of Former Slaves in Postrevolutionary Massachusetts
Parker, K. M. (2001) · Utah law review · doi:10.63140/.8ej9f6ko_ · Cited by 7
Review Essay: Tall Tales but True?
Mayne, A. (2006) · Journal of Urban History · doi:10.1177/0096144206294723 · Cited by 6
Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground: Maryland during the Nineteenth Century
Johnson, M. P., & Fields, B. J. (1987) · The Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/204312 · Cited by 6
Roots of disorder: race and criminal justice in the American South, 1817-80
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5885 · Cited by 6
A Narrative of the Life of Rev. Noah Davis, a Colored Man
Davis, N. (2008) · Library of Congress (Library of Congress) · Cited by 6
The Supreme Court justices: illustrated biographies, 1789-1993
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-2455 · Cited by 6
Black, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Social History · doi:10.1093/jsh/sht040 · Cited by 5
The Puritan Roots of Daniel Raymond's Economics
Frey, D. Ε. (2000) · History of Political Economy · doi:10.1215/00182702-32-3-607 · Cited by 5
Bogen, D. S. (1990) · American Journal of Legal History · doi:10.2307/845828 · Cited by 5
Primus, R. A. (2005) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 4
Church and State in Early Maryland
Petrie, G. (2009) · Cited by 4
The Annapolis Poll Books of 1800 and 1804: African American Voting in the Early Republic
Bogen, D. S. (1991) · Digital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) · Cited by 4
Free Exercise in the Free State: Maryland's Role in Religious Liberty and the First Amendment
Lasson, K. (1989) · Journal of Church and State · doi:10.1093/jcs/31.3.419 · Cited by 4
Democracy Rising: The Monuments of Baltimore, 1809-1842
Ryan, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Urban History · doi:10.1177/0096144209351084 · Cited by 4
Violence and the Rights of African Americans in Civil War–Era Indiana: The Case of James Hays
Nation, R. F. (2004) · Indiana Magazine of History · Cited by 4
Citizenship And Immigration Law, 1800–1924: Resolutions Of Membership And Territory
Parker, K. M. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521803069.007 · Cited by 4
Jennie Carter: A Black Journalist of the Early West
Gardner, E. (2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 4
The Shattering of the Union: America in the 1850s
Rable, G. C. (2004) · Civil War Book Review · doi:10.31390/cwbr.6.4.18 · Cited by 4
Creating and Maintaining an Historical Tradition
Wesley, C. H. (1964) · The Journal of Negro History · doi:10.2307/2716474 · Cited by 4
Hugh Lennox Bond and Radical Republican Ideology
Fuke, R. P. (1979) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2207714 · Cited by 4
The Black Press in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1856-1900
Snorgrass, J. W. (1981) · California History · doi:10.2307/25158067 · Cited by 4
Benjamin Lundy and the Struggle for Negro Freedom
Merrill, W. M., & Dillon, M. L. (1967) · The New England Quarterly · doi:10.2307/363872 · Cited by 4
The Search for a Black Nationality: Black Emigration and Colonization 1787–1863
Marszalek, J. F. (1975) · History Reviews of New Books · doi:10.1080/03612759.1975.9946020 · Cited by 4
10. The Inherent Deceptiveness of Constitutional Discourse: A Diagnosis and Prescription
Smith, R. M. (1998) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814788837.003.0014 · Cited by 4
Popular Constitutionalism and the Underenforcement Problem: The Case of The National Healthcare Law
Young, E. A. (2012) · Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University) · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 143
- Yamin, 2002, Tales of Five Points: Working-Class Life in Nineteenth-Century New York
- Wright, 1921, The Free Negro in Maryland, 1632–1860
- Whitman, 1999, The Price of Freedom: Slavery and Freedom in Baltimore and Early National Maryland
- 1916, A Typical Colonization Convention, Journal of Negro History, 1
- Thomas, 1976, Public Education and Black Protest in Baltimore, 1865–1900, Maryland Historical Magazine, 73
- Sullivan, 1973, William Lloyd Garrison in Baltimore, 1829–1830, Maryland Historical Magazine, 68, 64
- Reser, 1998, Comment: Airline Terrorism: The Effect of Tightened Security on the Right to Travel, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 63
- Quarles, 1987, Charles Harris Wesley, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 97
- Phillips, 1988, Maryland and the Caribbean, 1634–1984: Some Highlights, Maryland Historical Magazine, 83, 199
- 10.4159/9780674089174 · DOI
- 2002, The Transformation of American Abolitionism: Fighting Slavery in the Early Republic
- Melton, 2005, African American Methodism in the M.E. Tradition: The Case of Sharp Street (Baltimore), North Star: A Journal of African American Religious History, 8
- Meeker, 2011, Curtis W. Jacobs’ Diary and Account Book, 1854–1866, Maryland Historical Magazine, 106
- Levy, 1994, The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment
- Katz, 1974, Resistance at Christiana: A Documentary Account
- 2013, River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom.
- 1985, Pigs and Positivism, Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 899
- Provine, 1996, District of Columbia Free Negro Registers, 1821–1861
- 2009, The Political Worlds of Slavery and Freedom
- George, 1973, Segregated Sabbaths: Richard Allen and the Rise of Independent Black Churches: 1760–1840
- Schneider, 2009, A Guide to the Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Courthouse, Baltimore, Maryland
- Gardner, 1976, Ante-bellum Black Education in Baltimore, Maryland Historical Magazine, 71
- Fuke, 1971, The Baltimore Association for the Moral and Educational Improvement of the Colored People, 1864–1870, Maryland Historical Magazine, 66, 369
- Floyd, 2014, Union-Occupied Maryland: A Civil War Chronicle of Civilians and Soldiers
- 2002, Slavery and the Law
- Elfenbein, 2002, From Mobtown to Charm City: New Perspectives on Baltimore’s Past
- Della, 1973, An Analysis of Baltimore’s Population in the 1850s., Maryland Historical Magazine, 68, 20
- Cook, 2003, Dancing across the Color Line, Common-Place, 4
- Conkin, 1980, Prophets of Prosperity: America’s First Political Economists
- Brophy, 1998, A Revolution Which Seeks to Abolish Law, Must End Necessarily in Despotism’: Louisa McCord and Antebellum Southern Legal Thought, Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 5, 33
- Brickner, 2003, The Passenger Cases (1849): Justice John McLean’s ‘Cherished Policy’ as the First of Three Phases of American Immigration Law, Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10, 63
- Beasley, 1997, The Negro Trailblazers of California
- Banks, 2004, A Contradiction in Antebellum Baltimore: A Competitive School for Girls of ‘Color’ within a Slave State, Maryland Historical Magazine, 99
- Banks, 2009, Curtis Washington Jacobs: Architect of Absolute Black Enslavement, 1850–1864, Maryland Historical Magazine, 104
- Ball, 1993, The Word and the Law
- Kantrowitz, 2012, More Than Freedom: Citizenship in a White Republic, 1829–1889
- 10.5744/florida/9780813044378.001.0001 · DOI
- Alloy, 2002, 158-County Banishment Georgia: Constitutional Implications under the State Constitutional and the Federal Right to Travel, Georgia Law Review, 36
- Knight, 1970, Slave Society in Cuba during the Nineteenth Century
- 1987, Light for All: Arunah S. Abell and the Rise of the Baltimore ‘Sun.’, Maryland Historical Magazine, 82, 197
- Abel, 2002, Judicial Independence: If You Gag the Lawyers, Do You Choke the Courts? Some Implications for Judges When Funding Restrictions Curb Advocacy by Lawyers on Behalf of the Poor, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 29, 873
- Yates, 1838, Rights of Colored Men to Suffrage, Citizenship and Trial by Jury: Being a Book of Facts, Arguments and Authorities, Historical Notices and Sketches of Debates – With Notes
- Wright, 1916, Centennial of the African Methodist Church
- 1858, Woods’ Baltimore Directory, for 1858–59
- 1833, The Life and Character of Patrick Henry
- 1804, The Rainbow; First Series: Originally Published in the Richmond Enquirer
- Wirt, 1803, The Letters of a British Spy: Originally Published in the Virginia Argus, in August and September 1803
- Wattles, 1838, Memorial to the General Assembly of the State of Ohio
- Turnbull, 1840, Travels in the West: Cuba; with Notice of Porto Rico, and the Slave Trade
- Tiffany, 1849, A Treatise on the Unconstitutionality of American Slavery
- 1997, Freedom’s Port: The African American Community of Baltimore, 1790–1860
- 1832, Speeches of John Sergeant of Pennsylvania
- Semmes, 1917, John H. B. Latrobe and His Times, 1803–1891
- 1840, Report of Messrs. Peck and Price, Who Were Appointed at a Meeting of the Free Colored People of Baltimore, Held on the 25th November, 1839, Delegates to Visit British Guiana, and the Island of Trinidad
- 1851, Regulations, Circulars, Orders and Decisions, for the Guide of Officers of the Navy of the United States, Continued in Part and Issued since the Publication Authorized by the Navy Department in March, 1832
- 1837, Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to Propose Amendments to the Constitution, Commenced and Held at Harrisburg, on the Second Day of May, 1837
- Pennington, 1841, Text Book of the Origin and History of the Colored People
- Pairpoint, 1857, Uncle Sam and His Country; or, Sketches of America, 1854–55–56
- Hall, 1852, Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States, Advising the President and Heads of Departments in Relation to Their Official Duties
- Services of Colored Men, in the Wars of 1776 and 1812
- Nell, 1855, The Colored Patriots of the American Revolution, with Sketches of Several Distinguished Colored Persons: To Which Is Added a Brief 224Survey of the Condition and Prospects of Colored Americans
- 1835, Minutes of the Fifth Annual Convention for the Improvement of the Free People of Colour in the United States, Held by Adjournments, in the Wesley Church, Philadelphia
- 1833, Minutes and Proceedings of the Third Annual Convention, for the Improvement of the Free People of Color in these United States
- Williams, 1987, The Baltimore Sun, 1837–1987
- 1832, Minutes and Proceedings of the Second Annual Convention, for the Improvement of the Free People of Color in These United States
- 1831, Minutes and Proceedings of the First Annual Convention of the People of Colour, Held by Adjournments in the City of Philadelphia, from the Sixth to the Eleventh of June, Inclusive, 1831
- 1842, Matchett’s Baltimore Director, or Register of Householders
- Anderson, 1897, Landmarks of Rensselaer County, New York
- 1860, The Maryland Code: Public General Laws and Public Local Laws, 1860
- Legrand, 1861, Letter to Hon. Reverdy Johnson, on the Proceedings at the Meeting, Held at Maryland Institute, January 10th, 1861
- Latrobe, 1832, Picture of Baltimore, Containing a Description of All Objects of Interest in the City and Embellished with Views of the Principal Public Buildings
- Latrobe, 1826, The Justices’ Practice under the Laws of Maryland
- 1838, The Ordinances of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
- Kent, 1826, Commentaries on American Law, in Four Volumes
- 1831, Journal of the Proceedings of the Senate of the State of Maryland
- Jay, 1853, Miscellaneous Writings on Slavery
- Handy, 1902, Scraps of African Methodist Episcopal History
- Goodell, 1844, Views of American Constitutional Law, in Its Bearing upon American Slavery
- Penningroth, 2003, The Claims of Kinfolk: Africa American Property and Community in the Nineteenth-Century South
- 1980, Proceedings of the Black State Conventions, 1840–1865
- 1817, The Doctrines and Discipline of the African Methodist Episcopal Church
- 1840, Digest of Patents, Issued by the United States, from 1790 to January 1, 1839
- 1851, Debates and Proceedings of the Maryland Reform Convention to Revise the State Constitution: To Which Are Prefixed the Bill of Rights and Constitution Adopted
- Browne, 1980, Baltimore in the Nation, 1789–1861
- Cowley, 1827, The Speeches of Henry Clay, Delivered in the Congress of the United States
- 1847, Constitution and Laws of Maryland in Liberia with an Appendix of Precedents: Published by Authority of the Maryland State Colonization Society
- Cobb, 1858, An Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery
- 1856, Catalogue of the New-York State Library: 1855
- 1855, Catalogue of the Library of the Massachusetts Historical Society
- Carter, 1821, Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York: Containing All the Official Documents, Relating to the Subject, and Other Valuable Matter
- Dorsey, 1840, The General Public Statutory Law and Public Local Law of the State of Maryland, from the Year 1692 to 1839 Inclusive: With Annotations Thereto, and a Copious Index
- Watkins, 1836, Address Delivered before the Moral Reform Society, in Philadelphia, August 8, 1836
- 1890, Notes on the Progress of the Colored People of Maryland since the War
- Schoeppner, 2009, Legitimating Quarantine: Moral Contagions, the Commerce Clause, and the Limits of Gibbons v. Ogden, Journal of Southern Legal History, 17, 81
- Nott, 1856, Slavery, and the Remedy, or, Principles and Suggestions for a Remedial Code
- 2015, Making Foreigners: Immigration and Citizenship Law in America, 1600–2000
- 1846, Index to the Law of Maryland: From the Year 1838 to the Year 1845, Inclusive
- 2000, Double Character: Slavery and Mastery in the Antebellum Southern Courtroom
- Mencken, 1899, A Monograph of the New Baltimore Court House: One of the Greatest Examples of American Architecture, and the Foremost Court House of the United States; Including an Historical Sketch of the Early Courts of Maryland
- Tyson, 1825, Life of Elisha Tyson, the Philanthropist
- Whittington, 1999, Constitutional Construction: Divided Power and Constitutional Meaning
- Looney, 1983, Biting the Budget at Legal Services, Southern Changes, 4
- 1997, Blacks, Whites, and Guns: Interracial Violence in Post-Emancipation Maryland, Maryland Historical Magazine, 92
- Melton, 2007, African American Maritime Pilots in the South Atlantic Shipping Trade, 1640–1865, Journal of the Georgia Association of Historians, 27, 1
- Wilson, 1902, Washington: The Capital City, and Its Part in the History of the Nation
- Mason, 1839, Journal of the Proceedings of the House of Delegates of the State of Maryland at a December Session Eighteen Hundred and Thirty Eight
- Beirne, 1988, The Impact of Black Labor on European Immigration into Baltimore’s Oldtown, 1790–1910, Maryland Historical Magazine, 83
- Koger, 1946, Negro Baptists of Maryland
- 1976, William Watkins: Antebellum Black Teacher and Writer, Negro History Bulletin, 39
- Scharf, 1881, History of Baltimore City and County
- Binney, 1853, The Alienigenae of the United States under the Present Naturalization Laws
- 1853, Proceedings of the National Convention held in Rochester on the 6th, 7th and 8th of July, 1853
- 2004, A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration
- Powell, 2001, Attorney General Taney and the South Carolina Police Bill, Green Bag, 5, 75
- Garrison, 1971, I Will Be Heard! 1822–1835
- Hancock, 1971, William Yates’ Letter of 1837: Slavery, and Colored People in Delaware, Delaware History, 14
- 1860, Testimony in the Case of Judge Stump, before a Joint Committee of the Legislature
- Sobel, 1988, Trabelin’ On: The Slave Journey to an Afro-Baptist Faith
- 1831, Resolutions of the People of Color, at a Meeting Held on the 25th of January, 1831
- Brodine, 2007, Interpreting Old Ironsides: An Illustrated Guide to USS Constitution
- Brown, 1993, Maryland’s First Political Convention by and for Its Colored People, Maryland Historical Magazine, 88, 297
- Porter, 1992, Comment: Toward a Constitutional Analysis of the Right to Intrastate Travel, Northwestern University Law Review, 86, 820
- Phillips, 1996, The Dear Name of Home: Resistance to Colonization in Antebellum Baltimore, Maryland Historical Magazine, 91, 180
- 1818, Rules, Regulations, and Instructions for the Naval Service of the United States
- Brent, 1852, Report of Attorney General Brent, to His Excellency, Gov. Lowe, in Relation to the Christiana Treason Trials, in the Circuit Court of the United States
- 1838, Report of the Third Anniversary of the Ohio Anti-Slavery Society, Held in Granville, Licking County, Ohio, on the 30th of May, 1838
- Nevin, 1884, Encyclopædia of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America
- Lundy, 1836, The War in Texas
- Forbes, 1998, But We Have No Country: The 1851 Christiana, Pennsylvania, Resistance
- Penniman, 2004, Baltimore’s Daily Press and Slavery, 1857–1860, Maryland Historical Magazine, 99, 491
- 1901, The Bench and Bar of Maryland: A History, 1634–1901
- Stopak, 1968, The Maryland State Colonization Society: Independent State Action in the Colonization Movement, Maryland Historical Magazine, 63
- Davidson, 2008, The Lawyer’s Perspective: Celebrating the Courthouse, The Green Bag: An Entertaining Journal of Law, 11
- Bragg, 1914, Men of Maryland
- Pratt, 2009, A History of the Book in America
- Story, 1833, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States . . . in Three Volumes
- Bates, 1863, Opinion of Attorney General Bates on Citizenship
- Mercier, 1841, Life in a Man-of-War, or Scenes in “Old Ironsides” during Her Cruise in the Pacific, by a Fore-Top-Man
- 1822, The Baltimore Directory of 1822 and 1823
- 1816, Minutes of the Proceedings of the Fourteenth American Convention for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, and Improving the Condition of the African Race, assembled at Philadelphia
- Adams, 1885, History of Baptist Churches in Maryland Connected with the Maryland Baptist Union Association
- 1871, Baltimore: Past and Present, with Biographical Sketches of Its Representative Men
- Bergman, 1969, The Negro in the Congressional Record, 1789–1801
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mass Criminalization of Black Americans: A Historical Overview
Hinton, E., & Cook, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306 · Cited by 247
de la Fuente, A., & Gross, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612951 · Cited by 75
White identity politics: linked fate and political participation
Berry, J., EBNER, D. B., & Cornelius, M. (2019) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2019.1615965 · Cited by 54
Jackson, L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108778688 · Cited by 50
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Martha S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-06-25
- OpenAlex
- W4211237095
- Semantic Scholar
- e07ae6eb08088e55462821ec8b15f4fe090f79b0
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 238
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 41.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Keywords
- birthright citizenship, African American citizenship, freedmen, Dred Scott decision, Fourteenth Amendment, national belonging, African American activism, antebellum United States, civil rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review