The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Philosophic Silence and the ‘One' in Plotinus
Abstract
Plotinus, the greatest philosopher of Late Antiquity, discusses at length a first principle of reality - the One - which, he tells us, cannot be expressed in words or grasped in thought. How and why, then, does Plotinus write about it at all? This book explores this act of writing the unwritable. Seeking to explain what seems to be an insoluble paradox in the very practice of late Platonist writing, it examines not only the philosophical concerns involved, but the cultural and rhetorical aspects of the question. The discussion outlines an ancient practice of ‛philosophical silence' which determined the themes and tropes of public secrecy appropriate to Late Platonist philosophy. Through philosophic silence, public secrecy and silence flow into one another, and the unsaid space of the text becomes an initiatory secret. Understanding this mode of discourse allows us to resolve many apparent contradictions in Plotinus' thought.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Numenius then practices a type of Platonic Orientalism that extols the “wisdom of the east” even as it subordinates it to more familiar Hellenic authorities, particularly Pythagoras and Plato”
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Banner, 2018
In the citing paper
“The interplay of Gnostics and Platonists in the third century is all the more alluring given how vociferously Plotinus and Porphyry came to denigrate their Gnostic contemporaries, exiling them from inclusion in their construction of the tradition of Plato and Hellenic philosophy more generally”
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Banner, 2018
In the citing paper
“At the same time, such fetishization is so central to Platonic literature that to denote it as “Platonic” is hardly a red herring”
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Banner, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism
Asprem, E., & Strube, J. (2021) · doi:10.1163/9789004446458 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Banner, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Banner, Nicholas
- ORCID
- Banner, Nicholas
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-03-16
- OpenAlex
- W2793439930
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Keywords
- Plotinus, the One, initiation, rhetoric, Neoplatonism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Philosophic Silence and the ‘One' in Plotinus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781316650790
- The paper
- Banner, N. (2018). Philosophic Silence and the ‘One' in Plotinus. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650790