Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative
Abstract
Alasdair MacIntyre explores some central philosophical, political and moral claims of modernity and argues that a proper understanding of human goods requires a rejection of these claims. In a wide-ranging discussion, he considers how normative and evaluative judgments are to be understood, how desire and practical reasoning are to be characterized, what it is to have adequate self-knowledge, and what part narrative plays in our understanding of human lives. He asks, further, what it would be to understand the modern condition from a neo-Aristotelian or Thomistic perspective, and argues that Thomistic Aristotelianism, informed by Marx's insights, provides us with resources for constructing a contemporary politics and ethics which both enable and require us to act against modernity from within modernity. This rich and important book builds on and advances MacIntyre's thinking in ethics and moral philosophy, and will be of great interest to readers in both fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MacIntyre calls the ethics of the contemporary market and economics 'parodies of ethics'.
“He calls the ethics of the contemporary market and economics 'parodies of ethics' (MacIntyre,2016, p. 128).”
From Alasdair MacIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy (2023) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, 2016, p. 128
MacIntyre resists Thomas Aquinas' doctrine of a single final end, holding that ultimate human good is a contextual and personal combination of goods so that each person has a final end that is their own.
“However, he still resists Thomas Aquinas' doctrine of a single final end, holding that 'ultimate human good' is a contextual and personal combination of the goods so that each of us has 'a final end that is our own' (MacIntyre,2016, p. 53)”
From Alasdair MacIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy (2023) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, 2016, p. 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alasdair MacIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy
Oslington, P. (2023) · Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12560 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Athota, V. S., Ferrero, I., & Jeganathan, P. M. (2026) · Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.70069 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacIntyre, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacIntyre, Alasdair
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- OpenAlex
- W4231747594
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 50.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Keywords
- modernity, human good, normative judgment, evaluative judgments, desire, practical reasoning, self-knowledge, narrative, neo-Aristotelianism, Thomism, Marxism, political ethics, ethics, Alasdair MacIntyre
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review