Cited by 488Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPolitical Philosophy and EthicsCritical Theory and Philosophy

Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative

MacIntyre, Alasdair·2016·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Alasdair MacIntyre explores some central philosophical, political and moral claims of modernity and argues that a proper understanding of human goods requires a rejection of these claims. In a wide-ranging discussion, he considers how normative and evaluative judgments are to be understood, how desire and practical reasoning are to be characterized, what it is to have adequate self-knowledge, and what part narrative plays in our understanding of human lives. He asks, further, what it would be to understand the modern condition from a neo-Aristotelian or Thomistic perspective, and argues that Thomistic Aristotelianism, informed by Marx's insights, provides us with resources for constructing a contemporary politics and ethics which both enable and require us to act against modernity from within modernity. This rich and important book builds on and advances MacIntyre's thinking in ethics and moral philosophy, and will be of great interest to readers in both fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316816967

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MacIntyre calls the ethics of the contemporary market and economics 'parodies of ethics'.

    “He calls the ethics of the contemporary market and economics 'parodies of ethics' (MacIntyre,2016, p. 128).”

    From Alasdair MacIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy (2023) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, 2016, p. 128

  • MacIntyre resists Thomas Aquinas' doctrine of a single final end, holding that ultimate human good is a contextual and personal combination of goods so that each person has a final end that is their own.

    “However, he still resists Thomas Aquinas' doctrine of a single final end, holding that 'ultimate human good' is a contextual and personal combination of the goods so that each of us has 'a final end that is our own' (MacIntyre,2016, p. 53)”

    From Alasdair MacIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy (2023) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, 2016, p. 53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacIntyre, A.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
MacIntyre, Alasdair
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2016-11-14
OpenAlex
W4231747594
Cited by
488
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 8
FWCI
50.36
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
Keywords
modernity, human good, normative judgment, evaluative judgments, desire, practical reasoning, self-knowledge, narrative, neo-Aristotelianism, Thomism, Marxism, political ethics, ethics, Alasdair MacIntyre

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review